Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I have similar tyre sizes and i run 32psi....

I do have massive camber on the rear wheels so i do tend to let them down a bit 30-29 area to get a little more grip on the road....

Anything more than 32psi and i get wheel spin due to lack of contact...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/89439-tyre-pressure/#findComment-1614290
Share on other sites

Hi guys...how many PSI would u pump into yer tyres on a ECR33 fer sizes from 225-255/40-45/17?

What does the tyre manufcturer recommend?

I'm running 235/45x17 Bridgestone GIIIs at 36psi - because that's what B/S recommends.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/89439-tyre-pressure/#findComment-1615171
Share on other sites

43 psi 225/50/r16 - but check the max pressure rating of the tyres you have - and actually this depends on the tyre. For example the Pirelli PZero Nero optimum recommended pressure by Pirelli upon phoning them is 39 psi for the 225/50/r16. I prefer 43 psi though.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/89439-tyre-pressure/#findComment-1616147
Share on other sites

43 psi 225/50/r16 - but check the max pressure rating of the tyres you have - and actually this depends on the tyre. For example the Pirelli  PZero Nero optimum recommended pressure by Pirelli upon phoning them is 39 psi for the 225/50/r16. I prefer 43 psi though.

damm wtf.. 43PSI?

thats high man... hardly any grip. Drop them down to 34PSI or best would probably be 32PSI in dry and like 29-30PSI for rears in the wet.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/89439-tyre-pressure/#findComment-1616886
Share on other sites

For most tyres people recommend 32psi.. 43psi is ALOT.. wonder why they recommend it, i'm sure there is a reason..

Yeah.. on average i've heard about 32 - 35 is a good balance on tyre wear + grip.. if you run them to high they don't wear evenly accross the tyre I believe..

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/89439-tyre-pressure/#findComment-1617027
Share on other sites

You'd need a very good reason to run >40psi. The max psi rating on the sidewall is not an indication of the pressures you should run.

I would try with 34psi all round and tweak it from there based on your personal preference. I run 35 on the front, 36 on the rear (235 F, 255 R)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/89439-tyre-pressure/#findComment-1617518
Share on other sites

It was 39psi recommended for those wheels by Pirelli.

And I recall that the reason I put the pressure up was because the outside of the wheels was scrubbing really bad at high speed cornering with 34 psi. 39psi is ideal for normal driving. The reason I used 43psi was that during high speed cornering it stopped my tyres outside edge wearing out too much. The inside wore due to the negative camber. At the end of the day the 43psi puts a bit of extra pressure on the middle, so it wears a touch faster in the middle, and causes it to be 2mm further worn by the time it reaches the wires at the bottom of the tread.

That pressure was ideal to me. -1.2 camber was my setting for the above.

Just bought new 18"/9.5" and 18"/8.5" wheels and was recommended 40psi. Havn't confirmed recommended pressure with anyone yet though.

Front rims 18"/8.5" with Bridgestone Potenza RE-01 235/40/ZR18

Rear rims 18"/9.5" Yokahama ASpec dB 265/35/ZR18

lowered now and have -2.84 camber on the rear and have not rolled the guards.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/89439-tyre-pressure/#findComment-1631119
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Everyone is too used to learning from places like HPA "how to tune" and what to expect at what point, rather than being able to see "The computer says I'm in cell with Row = 8, column =4, and I can see my fuel is lean, so lets add more" Everyone wants "real units", which helps for someone picking it up for the first time and seeing how bad the tune is if they're not used to touching it.   However, I think for most of us who want to play with it, you're 100% right, we're only needing to learn about it for OUR CAR. Which makes it great, and we don't need to care what the real values are, we just need to know which cell it is, that's causing the lean or rich point, or that we want more ignition timing or less. But again, everyone wants everything super you beaut and nearly self tuning, with VE maps, and a billion compensations...   Though then there's me over here when I'm doing reverse engineering work just reading data in hex format that most people couldn't work anything out from. Yet I can see what's going on.
    • Um. No. Since Matt introduced the TIM it has become a lot easier to deal with the consequences of changing K for AFM and injector swaps. Then, tuning is a f**king doddle. No-one needs to know or care how many grams of air are flowing or any other bullshit. Need more fuel in a cell? Add more fuel. Need more timing in a cell. Add more timing. Need to adjust any of the other tables for warm up and so on? No harder than anything else. Sure - it's not an ECU system for starting from scratch on an arbitrary engine. But then.....it was never supposed to be, not recommended for, and almost never used that way. So.... On your engine, in particular, Nistune/Nissan OEM is about as sophisticated and difficult as banging 2 rocks together. Those ECUs are primitive and simple. There is nothing difficult there. I learnt Nistune from scratch, created new maps with extended axes, interpolated/extrapolated the original maps onto them and tuned my RB20 (basically the same ECU as your 26 ECU) all by myself, more than 20 years ago. And that was long before even TIM.
×
×
  • Create New...