Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 333
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

mate i think u need to fly SK up north get him to tune it on your tuners dyno lol...if anyone can fix your problem its him mate. The man is worth his weight in gold easily.

Personally i reckon you should go for that injection kit, if it works on your mates 375kw supra it should at least help you reach your power goal on the rb. you only had like what 30-40kw to go. Or wait for god knows how long till you can get higher octane fuel. Mate times like this i bet you lived in brisbane (for the fuel ofcourse).

Good luck with this hey, its dissappointing to do that work to your car and not get the power you want. Breaks ya heart.

Your ign. map has been completely played with.

Maybe running so much more ign. over std impacts negatively on fuel consumption.

A couple of little strange things have been done with the fuel map.

Generally one will zero out the injector correction and rework the fuel map. It appears he's left some injector correction in there but also played with the fuel map. There also appears to be rather large variations in fueling at some load points.

Your not drawing much air either, it appears your using up to load points 16.

Mine with a crapp vg30det turbo running 12-13psi hits load point 16-17 and at a guess is making around 200rwkw.

Bl4ck32's R32 is running a small rb20det high flow running 16psi, that makes around 220rwkw using load points 17-18. The rb20det high flow has a very small turbine housing yet he is able to run upwards of 18degree's at wot.

A couple of questions.

What size injectors are you running?

Did you have the plenum on with the std 210rwkw turbo?

Edited by Cubes

my ign map hasn't been modified no where near that much either.

ive modified the first 10x10 ish cells my self and then theres a few cells on loda point 16 that have changed a little, the rest is the stock map

Paulr33,

Where your airflow percentages all set to 100% (Settings 3 tab)?

I had to set them all to 100% in order for everything to run nice.

Also.. Bl4ck32's car had an initial issue running the VH41 AFM.

Upon selecting the VH41 it simply would not run, pumping out shiet loads of fuel. It was tuned to suit using the std rb20/25 afm setting.

Then we attached the datalogit to it, init the pfc and for some reason it began working fine on the vh41 setting.

Definitely a little quirk there. :P

Paulr33,

Where your airflow percentages all set to 100% (Settings 3 tab)?

I had to set them all to 100% in order for everything to run nice.

Also.. Bl4ck32's car had an initial issue running the VH41 AFM.

Upon selecting the VH41 it simply would not run, pumping out shiet loads of fuel. It was tuned to suit using the std rb20/25 afm setting.

Then we attached the datalogit to it, init the pfc and for some reason it began working fine on the vh41 setting.

Definitely a little quirk there. :P

post-2054-1134863977.jpg

also i never get over 80deg water temp, usually just under like 76 so i miss out on the last correction factor, so i either have to set the 50deg to 0.0 correction or use the 50deg corr pretty much all the time

When you initially started it and had issues with it being rich.

Did you try setting the airflow percentages to 100%.

Dialing in 370/550 = 68% (round up)

Then selecting VH41.

Paul, I think you will achieve a safer more consistent tune if you were to set the 50degree high load correction factor to 0. Depends how well it drives when cold with the setting.

I'm using the R34 correction factor and as it turns out its basically running 0 at 50degree's. It actually made the car feel much nicer to drive, prior it would feel like it was cold (short choked free rev), now when cold it feels and rev's the same as if it were warm.

Edited by Cubes
well, I'm afraid to say, he's the only decent safe tuner in mackay....

The other mob who I won't mention, have a bad habit of blowing motors to pieces...

Hi Mafia,

Just had a look at your fuel map - I'll post up mine in a few days - interestingly my tuner didn't play with the fuel map much at all.

Just in the areas where it comes onto boost and high load areas.

In the original 210rwkw tune it wasn't touched at all.

I see you reach load point 16 - exactly the same as me with over 250rwkw. At load point 16 you're running 1 degree less timing than me. Bugger about the fuel. It'll be interesting to see how you go if you go ahead with the water methanol injection setup.

In the injection setting under setting we are running all six 550 cc nismos at 68%.

Cheers!

well, I'm afraid to say, he's the only decent safe tuner in mackay....

The other mob who I won't mention, have a bad habit of blowing motors to pieces...

good tuning is invaluable.

I know 2 workshops here in Melb that regularly have guys from Tazzie bring cars (not one or two either) for work.

Tell me that isnt a mission, putting your car onto a boat for gods sake.

If i had to drive half a day, so be it.

well, I'm afraid to say, he's the only decent safe tuner in mackay....

The other mob who I won't mention, have a bad habit of blowing motors to pieces...

Go for a drive to bundaberg or harvey bay and get it tuned.

Even better take some holidays come down to Brisbane and see the guys at mercury or matty down the coast...

There are a few QLD members that have a safe place to plark your car and rest your head for a day or two...

Then we can have a bit of an excuse to have a cruise and a BBQ...

If i had one more bedroom id have ya round...

Hi Mafia,

Just had a look at your fuel map - I'll post up mine in a few days - interestingly my tuner didn't play with the fuel map much at all.

Just in the areas where it comes onto boost and high load areas.

In the original 210rwkw tune it wasn't touched at all.

I see you reach load point 16 - exactly the same as me with over 250rwkw. At load point 16 you're running 1 degree less timing than me. Bugger about the fuel. It'll be interesting to see how you go if you go ahead with the water methanol injection setup.

In the injection setting under setting we are running all six 550 cc nismos at 68%.

Cheers!

So what your saying is your injectors are tuned to inject less because you have better fuel that is less prone to detonation, and I am having to inject much more fuel to stop detonation?

So there is nothing I can do, but run better fuel?

Do you run the same boost as me? Are you able to post up your mods?

THis is very interesting.

Even better take some holidays come down to Brisbane and see the guys at mercury or matty down the coast...

There are a few QLD members that have a safe place to plark your car and rest your head for a day or two...

Then we can have a bit of an excuse to have a cruise and a BBQ...

If i had one more bedroom id have ya round...

Well, I love guns, Futurama, The Simpsons, and I'm seeing a very hot asian chick.. I think we'd get on very well...hehe

So what your saying is your injectors are tuned to inject less because you have better fuel that is less prone to detonation, and I am having to inject much more fuel to stop detonation?

So there is nothing I can do, but run better fuel?

Do you run the same boost as me? Are you able to post up your mods?

THis is very interesting.

Well, I love guns, Futurama, The Simpsons, and I'm seeing a very hot asian chick.. I think we'd get on very well...hehe

No I'm not saying that I'm running less fuel than you - just the fuel map hasn't been altered as much as yours. Injector duty cycle on peak hold reaches 58%.

I'm running 18 psi, spikes to 19 as it comes onto boost.

Mods are

2835pro s

pfc, fc boost control

blitz lm cooler

k&n flat panel air filter stock airbox stock blow off valve

Z32 AFM

3''exh, 4'' cat hks dump

550cc nismos

Big clutch

That's all, everything else stock

If I wanted more power I'd look into nitrous.

Cheers

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • So the clockspring is responsible for the indicators cancelling on their own? I thought that was the function of that white thing in the center (any idea what it's called?)
    • Can you log IAT? Whilst WTA coolers have their place, doing any sort of sustained run is not one of them There are fixes that slow down the heat soak, like ice boxes, which don't last that long, and interchillers, which are fairly expensive, up grades to the WTA cooling radiator, which may require a bigger pump, and upgrades to the reservoir size,  and upgrades to the cooling fans, but, it all still heat soaks, and takes ages to come down in hot weather  For a turbo, that isn't locked into WTA like my PD blower is, can you not possibly swap to a nice air to air intercooler????, it would be better for sustained runs then, and have alot less things that could go wrong in my opinion 
    • So, the other thing I've sorted is a baseline dyno run up at Unigroup's new location. The auto trans was a little unco-operative by both shifting down when the throttle was floored on the dyno (so Mark had to ramp it up more slowly than in a manual) and also by shifting up at 6,000 even in sports mode instead of the indicated redline of 7,000 Still, on a hot day it made 240rwkw at 16psi which seems about right for 300kw (400hp) through an auto at the wheels.  The shape of the curve is not quite right because it was not full throttle to about 4,500 to stop it kicking down, but until I can get a tune on the auto trans control this was the best we could do.....full boost will be well below 5,000 once that is sorted, I'll get some data logs when I can to confirm For comparison, the R32 made 255 at 12psi (at 4,500) on the same dyno with tune, n1 turbos, cam gears, big exhaust but otherwise all standard so the v37 is likely a little better out of the box. One thing that is very clear is that the standard water to air intercoolers are not up to sustained use at full throttle in warm ambient temps. After about 5 runs (so only a few minutes full throttle), it was pulling boost and timing and dropping 10-15% power. Unfortunately I didn't get that printout and the Unigroup guys are away at the moment, will try and get hold of it on their return. So, looks like a healthy engine to start modifying and the only real area of concern is the w2a heat exchangers which the aftermarket has plenty of solutions for    
    • I maintain it actually looked really nice in person. So much so that I thought "No, this is illegal" but there it was, clear as day. I think we can easily call the wing and wheels/height to be transformative. Not saying it's better than the GR Whatever, or the 86, or the WRX STI or anything of that sort (the internet says it all bolts up so you can buy best of all worlds?) but it's still at least a thing and not nearly AS bad as people say.
    • That's less offensive than the previous gen.....except for all that ugly black tupperware around the edges. Blerck!
×
×
  • Create New...