Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Separate but related info from above.

The unavailability of a suitable internally gated housing for the GT30 core (in Australia at least) seems about to be corrected.

Here is the information from Garrett Aust.

"we are producing .63A/R and .82A/R Turbine Housings for the GT30 (Turbine Exducer Diameter 54.86mm) range of Turbochargers, manufacture of the tooling required is in progress. We would hope to have the finished Housings available about end March 2006

At this stage we don't plan to make anything smaller

All Mounting and Outlet Flanges will be same as GT35 currently used on BA Falcon XR6 Turbo"

Racespec has made it known that he will be able to supply these complete units by around Easter. No doubt this is the case with GCG, HP in a box, MTQ etc.

Discopotato may be able to chime in here re the compatibility of flange patterns because I don't have much knowledge about the specs used by Ford.

Hopefully all of the above gives some hope of correcting the sagas Mafia is having. He has gone to a lot of work and deserves credit and assistance so he doesn't blow a heap of $$ (end of grand-stand).

cheers

  • Replies 333
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I'm not going to mess around with the VG30 now that I've seen a few have issues making close to 270-280rwkw.

GT30R + .87 HKS Turbine housing + HKS Cast manifold is my decision... for now lol.

I'll be happy with 270-280rwkw, more than enough in rwd 1300kg 3ltr mid range monster. :)

The GT35R would be nice BUT with the .82 it appears with cams its pretty much all in by 3500rpm. I really want it in by low 3000's.

Even if the HKS turbine housing ends up costing as much as an external gate setup I don't care, I want it looking stockish with a decent manifold (HKS Cast) and without a manifold and external gate hanging out everywhere.

Such a Pitty HKS didn't place the external gate flange underneath instead of on top.

Good choice.

The ex gate isn't too obvious if you are still running a cross over pipe. You can alway plate it and run an internal gate turbo, theres a heap of room around the exhaust side once installed.

And because you are running a 30 block you probably wont have the same issues fitting the big ass comp cover in that i did :D (stupid engine mount)

Mafia wat boost controler are u looking 4

i f**ked around with my eboost2 and got more bottom to mid range from the 3 settings

1 is boost

2 is turbo sensativity

3 is waste gate preshor

i have muked around with these in the past few days and i have found that i completly changed how it would spool and how fast it spool how much and top boost preshor

might help cause you can fin tune your turbo

just a thourgh by the way 1 of the better theads clever peolpe and good discusions

james

Separate but related info from above.

The unavailability of a suitable internally gated housing for the GT30 core (in Australia at least) seems about to be corrected.

Here is the information from Garrett Aust.

"we are producing .63A/R and .82A/R Turbine Housings for the GT30 (Turbine Exducer Diameter 54.86mm) range of Turbochargers, manufacture of the tooling required is in progress. We would hope to have the finished Housings available about end March 2006

At this stage we don't plan to make anything smaller

All Mounting and Outlet Flanges will be same as GT35 currently used on BA Falcon XR6 Turbo"

Racespec has made it known that he will be able to supply these complete units by around Easter.  No doubt this is the case with GCG, HP in a box, MTQ etc.

Discopotato may be able to chime in here re the compatibility of flange patterns because I don't have much knowledge about the specs used by Ford.

Hopefully all of the above gives some hope of correcting the sagas Mafia is having.  He has gone to a lot of work and deserves credit and assistance so he doesn't blow a heap of $$ (end of grand-stand).

cheers

dude, you're an absolute legend... I owe you something cronic.

Yes Dale FZ1 confirmed turbo specs , 90 trim cropped GT30 turbine with 52 trim TO4S compressor . The only available housing that suits it and has a hope of working is one of the HKS ext gate T3 flanged housings . From memory both HKS GT2835 Pro S housings are for the 84 t version of the cropped turbine . Still leaves you with the water pump grade compressor though .

The turbine housing on the XR6 edition GT3540R (GT3582R) has the T3 flange and a unique dump pipe pattern . This housing is not manufactured by Garrett and has FORD cast onto it . I have seen one and remember thinking that it would have a hard time bypassing (wasting) enough exhaust gas on a hard worked GT3540R - but it also has a .50a/r TO4E compresser cover on the cold side which probably limits airflow . Ford went to a lot of trouble to kill the fun with much more than a blurts worth of boost in std form . Reasonably cheap, compact and make torque from cranking revs on the bloated toad mobile . Got the legs on the 8 though !

Honestly I think the HKS housings are better , much better cast finish and the critical nossle/volute section is a bit nicer than Garretts Diesel housings . With HKS Pro S housings , a lot of effort has been spent on making the waste gate capable of a lot of flow with less resistance than your typical Garrett integral housing . The flap is huge in comparison and the gas port has been shaped to flow easily beyond the valve itself . I'd say its an attempt to make an integral gate housing work properly with high pressure ratios (boost) but they're pretty selective of which compressor they use at the other end . Have you noticed how they don't want to sell you a .87a/r housing with the GT2835R version and trying to get the .68 housing on the GT3037 Pro S is probably difficult . Its all to do with avoiding surge and high exhaust manilold pressure which promotes boost creep amongst other nasties .

I've lost interest in 2L 4's (FJT) and aim to jump over the short stroke short rod RB25/26's to an RB30DET so GT30R's/GT3037R's are not what I'll need . If I did I would have tried to get either a 52T version of the GT3037 or the REAL GT3071R and used a HKS Pro S exhaust housing . The cheapest option would be the XR6 turbo but I think I can do better . SK said he had a bit to do with a 30DET with an .82a/r GT3540R and it worked very well . As always the issue is the waste gate which must have been external , its a pity HKS didn't make a Pro S version of the GT3540R but then they didn't see many 3L's did they .

Cheers A .

Mafia - I had a VG30 rear housing into a rx7 core and rear wheel with a .60 at t4 front and the max power i was able to get was about 240rwkw.

Do you know what trim t04 wheel you used on the Rx7 core ?

No idea... it was just a t04 60 front. dont have any specs its long gone. did not make enough power for me.

The guy said who built it that it will get me 300rwhp and he right on the money. it made about 330 ish

Mafia

I wouldnt bother with this as i installed a 14psi XR6 upgrade wastegate actuator (spring was rated for 14psi) it changed it a LITTLE but still dropped 5 6 psi up top without fail every boost.

Your going to have to go for a larger rear housing to fix this :)

hhmm... Just thinking, I have a few ideas to try and make this a little better.

First I am gonig to install a spring on the wastegate flap to try and create a bit more tention, to see if its blowing open.

Second, I am going to do what I have been meaning to do for a while and get a better boost controller than a bleed valve - The powerFC boost control kit. My mate set up the Link boost control kit and his boost was hitting way harder, and much better and earlier. You could even hear the turbo work a lot harder.

The exhaust housing:  Do you all think I should get the garrett equavilent .63 internal gate housing, or go a step bigger and get the .86 internal garret housing?

I'm a little confused. Will the specs of the turbo help? I'm going to get them and post them up

Cubes there's no reason not to try a GT30R with big housings its just that it may struggle if you put lots of boost and revs into it . I tend to think the 35R with the middle sized .82 should be good , my comment about the XR6T is because of the flange and gate type . SK tells me that we should not be scared of the 1.06 housing if the CR and tune is right on a 3L .

Anyhow its probably safe to say that VG30 housings work on RB25/VG30 turbos and the GCG hi flow . For anything else including Ser 4/5 RX7 hybrids its a waste of time and money .

Cheers A .

I've been thinking a little more simplistically for a second.

Think about this - Coming on boost , there shouldn't be much pressure to blow open the wastegate flapper because the car isn't on boost yet, creating flow with would create lots of gas in the exhaist manifold.

So really, when everyone else says the exhaust housing is too small too much pressure in the ehaust manifold etc etc, then it should be coming onto boost like REALLY early and overboosting etc, maybe even causing damage, and being really "tired" or reluctant up top due to the exhaust housing being small creating a restriction?

But Up top, it pulls its hardest. Like really hard. Much better than V8's kind of top end power.

I mean think about it, its a .63 housing and its

almost 5000rpm to make 15psi in 2nd

4500rpm to make 15psi in third

bit over 4000rpm to make boost in 4th.

What the hell is going on... Its a tiny housing... It should be making boost so bloody early its not funny.

Surley having a TO4S 7 blade wheel and .7 comp cover wouldn't make that much lag?

Edited by The Mafia
I mean think about it, its a .63 housing and its

almost 5000rpm to make 15psi in 2nd

4500rpm to make 15psi in third

bit over 4000rpm to make boost in 4th.

What the hell is going on... Its a tiny housing... It should be making boost so bloody early its not funny.

Surley having a TO4S 7 blade wheel and .7 comp cover wouldn't make that much lag?

No it wont. I have a t300s, which is the same t04s comp wheel as you and a .63 T3 rear turbine that looks to be identical(ex gate though). However it is a hks low mount setup.

I can have 7, 12, 17 or 20 psi all in by 3200rpm (that's in third, it's too quick for me to tell accurately in second as i have to look at the hand controller, my stock tacho is a waste of space). And it isn't ball bearing either.

Disco seems to be having fun bagging the t04s comp wheel, but as far as i can tell, it isn't alot worse than the current generation 6 blade wheel. It is less efficient, particularly at low boost levels, and wont make the same outright power as the current generation wheel. The power you are making is pretty much on the money considering the fuel used and the boost you are running. Your issue is response, the power will sort itself out if and when you run more boost, just don't expect 270 plus like bigcarl, i made 240 at the same boost, which i was happy with considering the response i have. I dont have cams either and the exhaust gear is set to zero atm.

I'd be looking for thing's like intake restrictions, exhaust restrictions, possible cam timing (particularly if the timing belt has been changed). The stock exhaust manifold should be able to flow enough that you can make 7-14psi early in the rev range, even if it drops off at the top end. In all honesty with the log style manifold and bb core you should have better response than me. Also considering the highflows have a near enough identical rear wheel and work well, i wonder how the rear housing can be an issue.

so you think that there is something wrong with the exhaust?

Paulr33 said earlier that this could be a problem, and it is on my list of things to do in checking it out. But Paul seemed to think that the exhaust was stopping the power goning any higher than what it is...maybe it's causing the lag?

So you do agree that there is definately a problem that needs to be fixed that isn't the turbo?

I mean, come on, 4500rpm for 15psi in third? The turbo can't be THAT bad of a mix.

There is definately something fishy going on... And its PISSING ME OFF. An RB20 with a T88 would be more responsive than this POS.

heh.. sorry, its making me cranky. I hate lag, thats why I installed a .63 housing.....

I highly doubt the intake is causing a restriction - I've got a Pod filter connected to a Q41 90mm AFM, and 4 inch all the way to the bell mouth. Then I think its 2.5 or 3 inch Apexi plumbing all the way through a 600x300x75 FMIC, and all the way to the standard throttle body.

Maybe my cat is f**ked? Or maybe blocked?

The exhaust is that fantastic Split front pipe, in a 3 inch cat, 3.5 inch through a straight through muffler, and 4 inch though a cannon....WTF....

Guessing, the weakest links could be that cat, might be blocked from all the toluene or something, or it could be that muffler somehow.

Next thing I will check is to see of the Wastegate flapper is creeping, if it isn't, Powerfc boost control kit.

Then I want to get a Water Methanol setup and put 17psi through it, advance timing and 95 ron fuel. Maybe that will stop pre ignition enough to get some decent power out of it. After the water meth goes in, I will probably go to either townsville or Mercury motor sports to get it tuned properly.

If all that fails, I am going to get a rum bottle, some rag, and put some of that awesome 95 ron fuel in it, light it and smash it through the windscreen.

Edited by The Mafia
hey mafia

i have just installed a gt3071.. with the new six blade comp wheel. and feels great

when does the boost start and finish in each gear? What size is the ex housing?

i have only had it on the car for about a week , so im still in the process working out how and when.. its a little slow off the line being a auto with a stock converter, but once you get to about 35/40 kmph it pulls like a train..

I can have 7, 12, 17 or 20 psi all in by 3200rpm (that's in third, it's too quick for me to tell accurately in second as i have to look at the hand controller, my stock tacho is a waste of space). And it isn't ball bearing either.

If I had this, I'd be the happiest guy in the world. I need to work out whats wrong!

But Up top, it pulls its hardest. Like really hard. Much better than V8's kind of top end power.

V8s have top end??

Do a run on the dyno with no cat. I had a similar problem were I wasnt making power and it turned out to be the cat. My best mod was removing it :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • pffft! My alignments are starting to take 3-4 weeks each. Bugger overnight - that would be a dream! Overnight is when I leave it on stands with the rear suspension in pieces, hoping I can remember where I was at when I come back to it. I have to set the car up on a level surface so I can get decent camber measurements, then try to set the RUCAs to the right length to get that right. Then I have to put the car somewhere else where I have enough room to set up the bumpsteer gauge (laser, paper, mirror), so I can dial out that. Then I need to go measure camber again because changing the tension arm length affects that also. Then I need to measure toe, and I can't do that to my own satisfaction at home, so I have to put it on an actual aligner. Then I have to go back and fix the camber again, and if that took more than a half a turn, decide if I want to set up the bumpsteer measurements again. I previously had the bumpsteer almost completely banished and then I started changing things again! And that's only the rear end. Not even gotten to talking about the front yet. And this has been going on in the context of me discovering a seized bolt in the LHR FUCA bush at the upright, hence needing total disassembly to replace that bush and the others that were not far away from the same outcome, replacing sphericals in the front end and making a mistake that resulted in needing to do it again, which is only half done right now. It's a selfmade nightmare. Only have self to blame, etc etc. But regardless, I am so complelely unable to utilise the services of a normal wheel aligner that I have no choice. I haven't found a shop in my city that does "race" alignments - and by that I don't mean I want my car to be set up for racing, but the set of adjustments that I have available and that need to be used to do the alignment are the same as you'd find on a race car. I haven't looked everywhere, but there doesn't appear to be the equivalent of the motorsport focused shops that are present in Sydney and Melbourne. And such an alignment would cost $300, and you only want to do it once in a while, and you don't want to find out that you have to replace bushes and bearings and such while you are spending that $300 so you have to come back and spend it again a week later. So I stay living in my self made nightmare for the moment.  
    • Well, yeah, obviously. But then you have a turbo with 270kW "design", meaning it will have the higher boost threshold and lag of a bigger turbo, but only doing the work of a smaller turbo. That's the suck. That's actually exactly where I am right now, because my stocker exploded and I got Tao to do a highflow for me. I got a low pressure actuator on it and don't push it past ~10 psi or so, where the stocker was being run at ~12 psi. it makes a little more power than the stocker did, but it lags like a bitch. But, if I run any more boost it starts to ping and the ECU goes into panic mode, which cuts all the fun, so it clearly needs to be tuned. But, until such time as I (which is not I, it's my bro-in-law) can actually get the dyno working again, and get some injectors, and do all the swap over of those and the R35 AFM, I can't attempt to use the turbo the way it really deserves to. So what I have now is something that drives worse than what it did before it filled the cat with little pieces of turbine. I will tune it eventually, and probably only push it up to ~250-270 rwkW, which is pretty close to the max for that highflow anyway. I would imagine that by getting the tune right, and with newer betterrer injectors, we can probably make the boost come on a little earlier than it does now.** And if I do not think that the top end reward is worth the low end sacrifice, I will sell it off and convert to a G30, because the smaller ones of those come on boost very nicely on a 25 and make more power than I realistically need or want. The only reason I didn't do it at the time the turbo blew up is that I wasn't ready to sink a lot of money into an Artec manifold, reverse rotation turbo, the AFM and injector upgrade that would have been immediately compulsory, and the dyno was being problematic.*** It was easier and faster to just put the highflow on. And then, as I mentioned in an earlier post, even that is not "easy", because Tao's highflows use a shorter core than the Hitachi, so the compressor housing moves backwards in the bay, necessitating that all of the pipework had to get modded. ** And maybe just maybe, check the valve clearances and put new shims through, because I have recently seen firsthand on another motor that sloppy clearances on the shims can cost a lot of effective timing and lift and really slow an engine down. 3S-GTE in a Caldina got new shims, closing the clearances from just above the max to right down near the minimum, and it is a massively different car to drive. On boost the better part of 1000 rpm earlier!
    • ooooooh so this is where they get posted  Was at a wedding that day anyway, but the next one I will be there for SURE.
    • @PranK, why do we have this restriction? Because photos are the first thing that gets asked of new people on the forums. Do the spam bots post photos if allowed?
    • How do you rate the clutch @joshuaho96? Sometimes I wonder whether it's genuinely very driveable or whether I just feel that way because it cost a good chunk of money. Most recently when seeing the guy at the tyre shop struggle to move the car...
×
×
  • Create New...