Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys,

Just something i've been wondering about the last couple of days:

How and why has Nissan decided the redline/rev limit in the different capacity Rb engines? For a start, the 20 with the shortest stroke has a limiter around 7500, the 25 (s1 r33) has the limiter around 7k (mine was at 6850 or so with the stock computer) with the next longest stroke and the 26 is up around 8 with a longer stroke again.

What i'm wondering is obviosly the stroke has little to do with it so is it the crank design (counter weighted vs not?), or is it the head design? the 20 and 25 share similar lifts, durations and hydraulic lifters so why the 500rpm difference, while the 26 has solid lifters and bigger cams (so more stable at higher rpm?).

Or is it the stock turbo?

How do people with rb30dets decide on a safe limit to use? And whats to stop me (other than increased engine wear) raising the limiter on my rb25 considering my power is still rising pretty rapidly at redline?

Thanks for any replys,

Dave

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/90224-rb20252630-redline-question/
Share on other sites

the rb20 has a higher limiter as it has a short stroke, and smaller capacity the shock loading, power generated by each revolution and some other factors is lower thus the engine can safely rev higher. The 25 has a relatively low limiter or a few reasons the main two are the rods are weaker than say an rb26, and the engine doesnt need to rev any harder as it is out of its effeciency range, the cams, cam timing, head flow dont work as effecienty above 7g so why bother reving it. Also the car was never marketed as a race bread car rather a good sports car, and a good sports car should have good low end response as well as up top go. The rb26 is a race bread engine. The bigger revs are a result of better engineering and the need to rev a short stroked engine to make the power, other factors such as head design solid lifters etc accomodate higher revs.

When building a rb30 with a twin cam head setting a limiter is really a mater of how the whole package is set up. What sort internals have been used, what is the head setup like??? However on a rb30 regardless of build you dont really ever need to take it beyond 7500RPM, as usually they have rolled over on the power curve anyway and alot of other strengthening work needs to be done to safely rev beyond 7.5-8g. This isnt a really technical answer but I am sure you will get the idea.

BH dave you can raide the limiter I have done it to 3 gtst, have raised the limiter to 8 because they where still making power till redline, However 2 of those cars spat rods out the side as the oil pumps didnt like that any rpms. The other we tuned with adjustable cam gear on the inlet to get it rolling over at about 7.2 with the limiter now set at 7.5k. Its a mater of the condition of the car as much as anything else, however rb25 do blow far easier in my experiece by making around with limters, boost and timing than the other rb series and it comes down to some of the stuff I mentioned above!!!

So since I am rebuilding my RB25 NEO (solid lifters) with RB26 rods and possibly some cams, does that mean I can safely rev it a bit higher?

I note that the NEO RB25 has a 7050 redline rather than the 6850 redline of earlier models however I can't say it does much with the extra revs in my experience.

One thing that bugs me is from what i have seen midly modified rb20's make peak hp bewteen 6200 - 6800 rpm. Engines without cams this is.

Then pretty much the power dies of.

So really not sure why people swing the rb20 beyond 7k in these states of mods.

So since I am rebuilding my RB25 NEO (solid lifters) with RB26 rods and possibly some cams, does that mean I can safely rev it a bit higher?

I note that the NEO RB25 has a 7050 redline rather than the 6850 redline of earlier models however I can't say it does much with the extra revs in my experience.

Unless somehow the Nissan FAST IPC is wrong, your R34 NEO engine already has RB26 rods.. rod p/n 12100-05u01

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I've got the rear ones, they're certainly beefy. I need to take them to my driveshaft guru to check over, he's very fussy about the quality of components so I'll let you know if they are made of cheese by a blind man.   Are you in Australia? A mate just had a set of EN26 shafts made for his K20 Lotus by our fabricator which were quite cheap (compared to Driveshaft Shop) so if you can procure the CV's and draw what you need he'd make them for ~$800 for the pair.
    • Had I known the diff between R32 and R33 suspension I would have R33 suspension. That ship has sailed so I'm doing my best to replicate a drop spindle without spending $4k on a Billet one.
    • OEM suspension starts to bind as soon as the car gets away from stock height. I locked in the caster and camber before cutting off the kingpin. I then let the upright down in a natural (unbound) state before re-attaching it. Now it moves freely in bump and droop relative to the new ride height. My plan is to add GKTech arms before the car is finished so I can dial camber and caster further. It will be fine. This isn't rocket science. Caster looks good, camber is good, upper arm doesn't cause crazy gain and it is now closer to the stock angle and bump steer checks out. Send it.
    • Pay careful attention to the kinematics of that upper arm. The bloody things don't work properly even on a normal stock height R32. Nissan really screwed the pooch on that one. The fixes have included changing the hole locations on the bracket to change the angle of the inner pivot (which was fairly successful but usually makes it impossible to install or remove the arm without unbolting the bracket from the tower, which sucks) and various swivelling upper arm designs. ALL the swivelling upper arm designs that look like a capital I (with serifs) suck. All of them. Some of them are in fact terribly unsafe. Even the best one of them (the old UAS design) shat itself in short order on my car. The only upper arm that works as advertised and is pretty safe is the GKTech one. But it is high maintenance on a street car. I'm guessing that a 600HP car as (stupidly, IMO) low as you are going is not going to be a regular driver. So the maintenance issues on suspension parts are probably not going to be a problem. But you really must make sure that however your fairly drastically modded suspension ends up, that the upper arms swing through an arc that wants to keep the inner and outer bolts parallel. If the outer end travels through an arc that makes that end's bolt want to skew away from parallel with the inner bolt, you will build up enormous binding and compressing forces in the bushes, chew them out and hate life. The suspension compliance can actually be dominated by the bush binding, not the spring rate! It may be the case that even something like the GKTech arm won't work if your suspension kinematics become too weird, courtesy of all the cut and shut going on. Although you at least say there's no binding now, so maybe you're OK. Seeing as you're in the build phase, you could consider using R33/4 type upper arms (either that actual arm, OEM or aftermarket) or any similar wishbone designed to suit your available space, so alleviate the silliness of the R32 design. Then you can locate your inner pivots to provide the correct kinematics (camber gain on compression, etc).
    • The frontend wouldn't go low enough because the coilover was max low and the upper control arm would collapse into itself and potentially bottom out in the strut tower. I made a brace and cut off the kingpin and then moved the upright down 1.25" and welded. i still have to finish but this gives an idea. Now I can have a normal 3.25" of shock travel and things aren't binding. I'm also dropping the lower arm and tie rod 1.25".
×
×
  • Create New...