Jump to content
SAU Community

Crap Fuel Economey...


justin911
 Share

Recommended Posts

If an injector is blocked or clagged sure less fuel will pass through, that fuel will also squirt instead of spraying a fine atomized mist.

Bad atomization = incomplete combustion = bad fuel economy.

If it starts fine then it sounds as if the injectors are ok. :blink:

Cold start water temp correction table also has some head room for fuel economy improvements.

The R34 values are a very good place to start from.

Depending on how much you are paying for the tune they will have the car for a day or two tweaking the water temp correction and a few other little bits.

Edited by Cubes
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 61
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

But doesn't it get into closed loop within about 2 -3 minutes anyway so closed loop running when reasonably cold will be the same?

I think I am only going to get a tune for 2-3 hours. Cold start correction the tuner may go off other R33s he's done I'm guessing. I'm going to the guy that tunes Sydneykids cars - the tuner seems pretty knowledgeable.

Are you talking about R34 Powerfc setings?

Cheers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Water temp injection correction has nothing to do with closed loop.

It richens up the afr when the car is first started, much like a choke.

As water temp increases the afr leans off to the usual afr.

The R34 water temp correction runs a little leaner and actually allows the car to run better when cold. Well, my car anyway.

You can throw it in your self to have a look see once its all tuned, don't forget to write down the origional values.

The R32/R33's origional water temp injection correction values are:

+80C 1.000 1.000

+50C 1.094 1.156

+30C 1.141 1.297

+10C 1.250 1.500

-10C 1.391 1.734

-30C 1.594 2.000

The R34's water temp injection correction values are:

+80C 1.000 1.000

+50C 1.031 1.078

+30C 1.063 1.219

+10C 1.250 1.469

-10C 1.391 1.734

-30C 1.594 2.000

Table reads as

temp, light load injection correction and moderate/heavy load injection correction.

As you can see the R34 runs slightly leaner. Mine used to really stink of fuel on the mornings, it doesn't tend to stink as much any more, also there is no slight flat spot that I previously had and the car simply drives easier when stone cold, that is starting and instantly driving away.

Have a good look around your pfc h/c, make yourself familiar with all the menu's and options. Do this now, before its tuned. So if you break something you can simply initialise the pfc and its all good again. :blink:

Edited by Cubes
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So what the engine doesn't run in closed loop till it gets to around 80deg C? I guess it must be about 5 mins or so till it goes to closed loop then. Have to have a check in the morning. I'll look at the 02 sensor readout

I have noticed a smell of fuel in the morning. I have looked at the table in the PFC hcontroller and thought the values were high. Thanks for the numbers :blink:

I guess the stock R33 ecu water temp correction values would be similar to the PFC R33 ones?

Thanks Cubes :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No idea what the stock values are.

Those values are from the PFC.

R32 and R33 values are the same.

R34 runs a little leaner.

My R32 gets up to operating temp within 2km's, earlier if I let it idle for a minute or so after the initial start.

I'm running the R34 values, they are perfect, it drives nicer than the origional rb20/25 values. So.. I'm not going to fiddle.

I did try fiddling with the rb20 values, I got flat spots and general bogging. i.e driveability suffered.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey Cubes put the numbers in today. I found that my car goes into closed loop within about 2 minutes anyway - so these corrections are only for when you are in open loop and before car gets to closed loop.

I get up to about 70 deg C within 3-4 mins of driving. ABout 5 mins before it reaches 80deg C

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes thats correct, mine gets to operating temp just as quick, you will find without as much injector correction the car will jump in to closed loop ever so slightly earlier than with a lot of inj. correction. :(

Every little bit counts.

How did you find drivability? Do you simply start and drive or let it idle for a min or two?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes thats correct, mine gets to operating temp just as quick, you will find without as much injector correction the car will jump in to closed loop ever so slightly earlier than with a lot of inj. correction. :(

Every little bit counts.

Do you simply start and drive or let it idle for a min or two?

How did you find drivability?

After I fitted the Z32 I found the car felt a little dead, it appears the z32 ever so slightly richens everything up. Using this table in mine has made it much better, no more dead feeling.

Edited by Cubes
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can tune it so that when it drops out of closed loop you run 11-12:1 afr's in order to pick up some off boost torque.

Tune it to 14.7:1 off boost if you are after economy.

You can go furthur and tune up to ~2psi with an afr of 14:1, helps a little with economy. It really depends on the turbo setup and how quickly it boosts, if it boosts quickly you may see an improvement in economy by tuning as such, if it doesn't make that 2psi until 3500rpm with 1/2 throttle then its pointless. :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey cubes if it is off boost then shouldn't it be at 14.7:1 anyway

"Tune it to 14.7:1 off boost if you are after economy."

Another thing. My stone cold idle is fine - but I find that after a day at work I come back and water temp is 25 deg C and the idle hunts for about the first 20 seconds... Wierd. It did it with the R33 PFC values and the R34 ones. On stock ECU it didnt

Edited by benl1981
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why would it be 14.7:1 off boost anyway?

When you drop out of closed loop mode due to pushing your foot on the accelerator too hard the afr will drop to anywhere from 13:1 to 12:1, then you push on the accelerator a little harder again and it comes on to boost, the afr's then drop to 11.5 or 12:1.

I'm not interestered in the pfc's common idle hunt issues, I'm more so interested in the transition from off to on throttle at low rpm, i.e decelerating in to a corner off the throttle then rolling back on the throttle at low rpm.

With the R32/R33 values I found mine bogged at low rpm a little.

I've always had the odd idle hunt, with the stock ecu and the pfc, the pfc for myself provides a much more stable idle.

However, It didn't until I adjusted the idle screw to the rpm idle set in the pfc. Then did an init and idle learn for the next 30mins.

I've just clocked 246km's to half a tank of juice, this bigger turbo is helping the 3ltr keep off boost and suck less juice at light throttle. :D

I had a good look at the exhaust today, usually I would see a small stream of black fuel smoke trailing from the exhaust on a cold start, I now see nothing. Apart from a bit of water due to condensation. :D

Edited by Cubes
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just find that mine stays in closed loop till a bit of boost is developed. Maybe if you hit half throttle or so at 2000rpm it will go to open loop without any boost present.

It idles quite erratically - might see what the tuner thinks..maybe it needs a little cold start enrichment (Is this seperate to inj correction)

Just a question - It says 15deg timing on PFC. ..The PFC doent know what you have it adjusted to on the CAS does it..or has it made corrections for the CAS position. I have about 17-18BTDC on the CAS (according to timing light)..Even though it says 15deg on powerfc do I actually have 17 ??

Thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is yours a 2ltr or 2.5ltr?

I find with the the 3ltr it drops out of closed loop really easy, with the lightest of throttle, stabbing the throttle has it instantly dropping to load points 15-16 with no boost from as low as 1200rpm. :D

---

The PFC assumes you have matched the timing to the value in the pfc.

Edited by Cubes
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share




  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Ahh yes looks like I’m playing with a new cock on the weekends. Thanks for the information @soviet_merlin I’ll search for it later on and try to get it shipped. Looks like it won’t happen this weekend regardless. But the coolant looks fine so far (no floaties of concern). And waiting another week will slow down my money hole 😂
    • I don't know whether that one should be reused or not. But here's one way to find the part. Go to https://nissan.epc-data.com and use frame number or the menus to drill down to the parts for your specific car. Looks like it is under 'Body parts -> 214 radiator'. See for example the respective part for my Stagea. Looks like it's called drain cock packing, and at least for mine it is part number 2148118000. Searching for that then gives you various places where you can buy it. Amayama can be a bit slow, so it's worth searching around. I'd make sure it's the correct one for yours. At least from amayama it looks pretty generic and fits a ton of cars. And if anyone asks what you did on the weekend, you can tell them that you put a new cock on the car
    • Because people like Gregged stories, I'll elaborate. I ordered a front end, being a GTR conversion front bumper, CF hood, to go with my URAS wider front fenders. These took a good ~year to arrive. They had arrived when I dropped them off at paint shop 1 and are in that large pile of car panels. Unfortunately _some_ of it didn't fit very well/at all, though to be more accurate it's safer to say it didn't fit with each other. A lot of GTR conversion parts, really are just GTR parts. GTR fiber replicas need GTR guards. Because GTR fenders flare out more than GTT fenders. Even GTT fenders that are flared out by the same amount GTR fenders are. The GTR conversion/GTR bumper I was sold is no longer for sale as the company involved recognized the issues with it and refunded it, beyond this situation. The bonnet and bumper gap was... this. They then sent a redesigned bumper, but this still had the issue with the width, and then advised me I needed GTR bracketry to fit this conversion bumper. Which, to me, is kind of crazy - Because if you need a GTR Reo, headlight supports, headlight brackets, and the mounting bracket (with the additional plate with the rubber strip) in order to mount your 'conversion' bumper, the bumper itself is just a GTR bumper. And when I mentioned this, not to mention the time and hassle of sending bumpers back and a forth and dealing with a busy company, I was able to make the statement that this is not made to fit a GTT at all, at least in the sense that you can't use any of it with any other GTT part. The bonnet worked, but without a bumper that can actually fit it was effectively just a GTR bonnet with GTT hinge points and latch points. Not much use if I can't use a bumper. Why would I (or anyone) buy a fibreglass GTR replica that costs more than an OEM plastic GTR bar, if I need to use all the GTR hardware to mount it anyway? Funny enough I had test fitted everything else except these bits. Obviously I should have. I saw pictures of things fitted but everything's not quite the same and unmentioned the fact people have made extra brackets or something to pull on these fibreglass bumpers. With the GTR brackets we were able to force the "second" bumper they sent us, but you shouldn't need two big guys forcing a fibreglass bumper over mounts you need to drill to get it to fit, using a lot of tension and a lot of force, the whole thing was completely taut and felt spring loaded to explode at any moment. In any case after all this faffing about, I eventually spoke to someone else at this company who advised I should have been sent the correct parts to begin with given they pulled up all my communications with what I had, what I wanted, what parts I was using, etc. But by this time the car had been sitting at Shop 1 for quite some time now and they didn't really just want to paint the rest of the car from A pillar back while this was all sorted out. I got a full refund and honestly everyone involved was perfectly nice and easy to deal with once I could get ahold of them, though it did need a bit of 'chasing' as you kinda expect. So then I had a stock front end again, and could have just fit the URAS fibreglass fronts and used an OEM front bumper and OEM hood and called it a day. But did I do that? No, I am retarded. Because I was paranoid about Mr Police in the future sticking a magnet to my front guards, or my bonnet and realising they weren't metal, I followed up on a tip I got from a friend who got his metal guards widened out. I had wanted to do this 'in the future some day' but thought I may as well just do this 'now' given I'd be driving around all paranoid about my fibreglass front fenders on my otherwise legal and engineered car. SO ANYWAY I engaged these people during the time I was returning the original body parts, so the car was at Shop 1 with no front end at all, not being fitted or being painted A pillar back even though I was more than happy to just get the front panels painted separately when they existed. (I understand the reasoning for not wanting this, but I was just trying to save time). And you guessed it, the metalbenders took much longer than they said they would take, and Shop 1 man had a medical issue where he had to close the shop indefinitely (legitimately).  So even though I had to return a bunch of stuff, and a car sat around for months with no work being done on it, there's no actual bad blood there, so I don't want to name names and say "SHOP X SUCKS" just... do your diligence. Metalbender place returned my Bonnet and Guards to me eventually, which was when I realised THIS: Is going to make my life hard again, because having wider metal guards doesn't make much benefit if the actual point it hits is the connection between the bumper and the guard. Which is why Nissan flared it out, ostensibly.   With regards to the bonnet, I needed vents in the first place because the car likes to overheat due to heat soak on 40C days with the aircon on, if the car has been driven for more than like 30 minutes. Only with the aircon on, only on days that hot, only when sitting, and only after ~30 minutes. So the logic behind it all was to cut vents in. I had originally thought to just the flat pieces out (not the webbing!) and put mesh in there, which would have worked fine. Then talking to the metalbenders I was convinced this was a bit agricultural and water would get in. STUPID EVERYONE INVOLVED didn't think of simply using a plastic engine cover on the engine, and we started talking about vent design and rain gutters instead. There was also the issue of while the guards both fit what I asked for, which was: "Can you replicate these URAS Fibreglass flares on these stock metal guards by the same distance, or maybe +10mm wider?" ..the issue was the guards weren't the same as one another when the job was done. Enough that when I fit them and went to paint places, the overriding feeling was "I can't get it painted while they're like that". So, I Karen'ed and they offered to fix them up to get them symmetrical again after I drove back and showed them, and we did the whole lean back from a few meters in front of the car, and: "Oh yeah" "ahhh yeah".. "Ahh, ... yeah, yeah nah yeah" ... and I then took them off and delivered them. I have it all back now, and while the guards are better they're still not symmetrical, and I'm paranoid about a tiny bit of webbing actually being cut with the vents installed, and only slightly remorseful about the fact that METALBENDING WAS REALLY EXPENSIVE, and it would have been cheaper to simply buy all of the Nissan OEM pieces, including $2200 aluminium bonnets, and $2000 guard sets and OEM plastic bumpers and get it done that way. YOU ARE WARNED. also, anyone wanna buy my GTR brackets between the headlights? Useful for someone doing this conversion and they cost about $1000 cause you didn't want to use/mark up/damage the fibreglass replica the company sold you to make their stuff fit (it won't fit).
    • Thanks gents, I think I'll get a PSR and see how it goes. I saw an interesting video in YT where a guy stripped one and the bearings were similar to the GTX series instead of the newer G series, but for 40% of the Garrett price I suppose there has to be some sort of trade off!
    • My opinion is they aren't worth double at all.  Have used a good number of Pulsars with builds I've been involved with and tbh at least speaking for myself, Garrett aren't losing money they'd be getting if Pulsar didn't exist as for genuine Garrett money I'd probably be buying something other than Garrett.    We've used Pulsar 6262G (G35 900 equivalent) on an RB26 with a twin scroll hotside and it picked up 40wkw at the same boost over the old twin -5s and the improvement in transient response over the twins changed the car - this is before you factor in the amount of further headroom of the G35.  Have also used one on a 2JZ drag car which has run 9.6 @ 141mph not even trying, from what we've seen so far it'll potentially go 8s when we turn it up  Crazy results for what is basically a NZ$1500ish turbo.  
×
×
  • Create New...