Jump to content
SAU Community

1st Launch In Gtr


gun32gtr
 Share

Recommended Posts

hey all i decided today i would give gtr its first launch sence ive had and well all i got was 1st,2nd gear fishing all the way up the road...didnt feel like there was any front wheel drive at all....just left 2 big black marks for 30m or so.

my question is should my gtr with only cat back zorst,hks pods and 0.9bar dom this or should it grip like all f.u.c.k and sit me back?

also have 255 michlin tyres all round with dam good tread left on them....any help would be good?

also checked fuses and there all fine

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i also read an article in the new hpi that says the attesa system can get air in it and can cause the system to work incorrect or real slow....but it said this happens from clutch and gboxes being pulled out and stuff?mine has standard clutch but u wouldnt no whats been in there

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How far does your torque gauge move? from what your saying it should be going nearly all the way to the 50.

Doesn't sound normal, i barely get any wheel spin, just grips and goes.

As already suggested, try bleeding your ATTESA. very simple/cheap to do. But it could be a worn out transfer case, they have clutch packs in them, if its had a lot of ks and lots of thrashing then they could be worn? Don't think you can really test it. Besides getting ti pulled out and looked at.

Ohh make sure you have a front driveshaft it could of been taken out and never put back. Also worth checking to make sure you don't have an ATTESA controller somewhere that is turned 100% to rear.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

thanks alot ferni ill check all of the above...torque gauge moves ok but in the hpi it said it should move with power and precise movements,ill bleed the system and see what happens....if i cant get and nissan fluid they say to use what else will to attesa system

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How many mates in the trade do you have? I would do a quick check with a diagnostic tool and see if it brings up any errors.

A diagnostic tool will do a simple check as it may be a faulty sensor, and there are quite a few that make up the attessa system. Im not to sure what a rebuild is worth but check the simple stuff first.

Cheers

Sumo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just do it exactly how HPI says. I have read it and it is exactly how the manual describes.

Don't just use ATF. Nissan requires a specific type of ATF.

The next step if the bleed does not work is to check sensors....the bleed is by far the easiest way first.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, yeah, the RB26 is definitely that far off the mark. From a pure technology point of view it is closer to the engines of the 60s than it is to the engines of the last 10 years. There is absolutely nothing special about an RB26 that wasn't present in engines going all the way back to the 60s, except probably the four valve head. The bottom end is just bog standard Japanese stuff. The head is nothing special. Celicas in the 70s were the same thing, in 4cyl 2 valve form. The ITBs are nothing special when you consider that the same Celicas had twin Solexes on them, and so had throttle plates in the exact same place. There's no variable valve timing, no variable inlet manifold, which even other RBs had either before the 26 came out or shortly afterward. The ECU is pretty rude and crude. The only things it has going for it are that the physical structure was pretty bloody tough for a mass produced engine, the twin-turbos and ITBs made for a bit of uniqueness against the competition (and even Toyota were ahead on the twin turbs thing, weren't they?) and the electronic controls and measuring devices (ie, AFMs, CAS, etc) were good enough to make it run well. Oh, and it sounds better than almost anything else, ever. The VR38 is absolutely halfway between the RB generation and the current generation, so it definitely has a massive increase in the sophistication of the electronics, allowing for a lot more dynamic optimisation of mapping. Then there's things like metal treatments and other coatings on things, adoption of variable cam stuff, and a bunch of other little improvements that mean it has to be a better thing than the RB26. But I otherwise agree with you that it is approximately the same thing as a 26. But, skip forward another 10 years from that engine and then the things that I mentioned in previous post come out to play. High compression, massively sophisticated computers, direct injection, clever measuring sensors, etc etc. They are the real difference between trying to make big power with a 26 and trying to make big power with a S/B50/54 (or whatever the preferred BMW engine of the week is).
    • Is the RB26 actually that far off the mark? Honestly from where I'm sitting a VR38DETT is not actually that much more advanced than the RB26. Yes, there is a scavenge pump on the VR38, it's smarter in a number of ways but it's not actually jumping out to me as alien technology. Something like a B58 or V35A-FTS on the other hand has so many surprising little design features that add up to be something that just isn't comparable. 
    • https://www.carsales.com.au/cars/details/2021-nissan-skyline-400r-auto-rv37/SSE-AD-17857548/ Well there you go 
    • Chris won't reply. He doesn't visit the forum much anymore. You can try these guys https://www.facebook.com/autotainment/ They did mine many years ago
×
×
  • Create New...