Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

id love to put a new to4z on it, but im in adelaide! The defect capital. Stealthy low mounts are a must, and even then they can still catch you out if they want to.

yeah all signs pointing to 2530's.. SK tells me he's seen 400awkw from a stock capacity 2.6l on pump i believe. Even so, would you say 380plus at the wheels will be a gimme on a 2.8?? :)

yeah car was reaching just under 2 bar by 5 and reved out to 9.5k, was very impressive!!!! considering sotock turbos reach full boost just under a 4k and from what I have heard tdo6's on a rb26 dont see full boost to near on 6 I would be confident in saying the extra 200cc was doing a hell of alot to make it a better driving car!!!

I have been in a R33 GTR with a veilside 2.8L stroker and twin td06's, and let me say the car was absolutley awesome. It was delivered from Japan as is and was an ex veilside promo car, I am sure as few of the older die hard skyliners in Sydney will know the guy and car I am refering to. With tdo6's and around 460rwkw the car came on strong and was alot more responsive off boost than expected, ie the extra 200cc made it such a different beast to say my gtr at the time with a rb26 and t51!!!

Just a quick side quip, I can send all the specs to a rb30 crank  to a very highly reputable parts manufacturer in America, they can produce for me a one off full forged billit crank for $7200USD in steel and $11,500USD in titanium!!!Now if I was ever going to do a 2.8L Jap kit I would first slap myself and say dont be stupid the Japanese kits are overpiced then I would send my crank over get it made then make a 28mm spacer for the top off my rb26 and have myself a 3L rb26. But then I would realised thats to much money and effort and build a aussie rb30 which have the same main girdle design (which people is the weak point of all the nissan straight 6 designs) and make the same power and save myself 10g! But I am not comparing APPLES AND APPLES so sorry!!!

At the end of the day SLY33 was after experience with the kits and from experience they are an awesome bit of gear, there only downfall I believe is expense, but its your money and you spend however you like my friend.

Cheers.

i understood that veilside never did a stoker motor ,i can even recall an inview with the man himself and he was asked why they never did stoker he liked a high reving motor more and didnt want to change the characteristics of the rb26, in there cars. Have a look at hpi dvd 5 for the interview

personally i think sly33 your on the right track a 2.8litre low mount twin combo will give you the ulimate street /track combo for a gtr any of the

turbos

GT2560R 707160-5

HKS 2530

trust 517Z (i think form memory)

are all very similar and very good turbos for the rb26 the 2.8 WILL give yoiu more torque and better responce ,NISMO did not race there's as a 2.8 for nothing for how many years and i believe HKS and TOMIE to be the best of the after market brand and they both do 2.8litre. i believe the japanise didn't go much bigger on purpose as the rb26 was built to rev.

I also seem to remember some of the most impressive street gtr's ever built were of this same comfiguration ,the black r34 gtr in the UK gtr video etc , look the ulimate gtr the Z TUNE is what ? 2.8 litre twin low mount why? because its the best combo for the gtr nismo ever came up with. Dont you think if there was a better for street track they might know about it after what 16years racing/tuning.

SLY33 your on the right track to and awesome weapon listen to the companies that know NISMO/HKS/TOMEI ETC.

as for the HKS GTRS turbos they are a little of an unknown or should i say unproven set up in the way that the small top end gains dont seem to out way the bottom end losses , over say the hks250/gt2560r etc BUT it might just be that none has just found the right combo for them yet .I actually hope Gav has sum luck with his 2.8 hks gtrs combo.

drop me a line if you would like to have a chat as there has been a few interesting thing i have picked up in the last few months in relation to this setup

pete

(my 2c)

Why is noone ever tries the Tomei bolt up turbos. I know they are based on Garrets, are they over priced pieces of poo, too expensive for ppl to try, not as good as 2530s????? Just like the Apexi AX530P22 xyz thingiemibobs. They simply dont stack up the performance of the 2530s??????

thanks pnblight, i have talked to a couple of workshops today, and consensus fairly consistent, the t517z's in the 8cm2, will be too small on a 2.8. They make 380rwkw on a 2.6 but im told that is really pushing it, and intake temps get very high. So im told on a 2.8 they will spin right out of efficiency earlier than on a 2.6, and start pumping hot air. The 10cm2 may be a good option, however, no one has tried these so they are an unknown, and im not really in a position to bite the bullet and buy something no one has solid results with. Im after tried and tested here!

From what i know of the 2530, it is no good in single form on a 2.5 at the top end, but is good on a 2litre. so at 1.4litres per turbo on my setup "shouldnt" be a problem. It has been suggested to me that even the 2.8 may spin the 2530's out of efficiency also.. But i would hope for a bare minimum of 350rwkw without pushing it too hard, plus the benefits of the 2.8 in off boost drivability and early spool up. Im still sussing possible options.

well i believe jagr33(i think is the sau name) has made 531rwhp/398rwkw with the trust turbos

i think what you need to ask yourself is where does your true priority rest responce your out right hp as if your not happy with 400rwhp you will battle to maintain a good responsive drive package. Out right hp doesn't make the fastest street car it's drivable traction and torque curve that makes a car truely fast in more than a straight line.

what is your goals

Why is noone ever tries the Tomei bolt up turbos. I know they are based on Garrets, are they over priced pieces of poo, too expensive for ppl to try, not as good as 2530s?????  Just like the Apexi AX530P22 xyz thingiemibobs. They simply dont stack up the performance of the 2530s??????

if the rest of the tomei gear is anything to go by i would thick they would be great turbos but i think is just there are so many other cheap turbo combos out there. I would love to try a set but the budget doesnt stretch that far.

pete

Why is noone ever tries the Tomei bolt up turbos. I know they are based on Garrets, are they over priced pieces of poo, too expensive for ppl to try, not as good as 2530s?????  Just like the Apexi AX530P22 xyz thingiemibobs. They simply dont stack up the performance of the 2530s??????

They are actually based on IHI units. I also have a feeling that the Z-tune uses one of these 'Tomei' turbines.

Tomei and NISMO have so much gear in common now. The Z tune crank is the Tomei crank, FPRs, fuel pumps, and a few other things.

well i believe jagr33(i think is the sau name) has made 531rwhp/398rwkw with the trust turbos

And since has gotten rid of the T517z's as he wasnt very impressed with thier power delivery and response compared to his new ones (garrett 2560) :D

little less power but more response.

I know thats what i'd want too, much better streeter

PNBLIGHT

Thanks for that I didnt actual know that Veilside didnt make strokers, do they make any forged cranks oruse others, the car must of had another brand maybe HKS?? It was certain that the car was an ex Veilside promo, it had a hideous one off kit with big veilside stickers down the sides and veilside badges and a number placard with veilside on it etc. Not bagging the 2,8 kits at all I think they are beautifully made just the problem as with most japanese stuff due to their economic situation, it's too expensive for the average joe!!!

PNBLIGHT

Thanks for that I didnt actual know that Veilside didnt make strokers, do they make any forged cranks oruse others, the car must of had another brand maybe HKS?? It was certain that the car was an ex Veilside promo, it had a hideous one off kit with big veilside stickers down the sides and veilside badges and a number placard with veilside on it etc. Not bagging the 2,8 kits at all I think they are beautifully made just the problem as with most japanese stuff due to their economic situation, it's too expensive for the average joe!!!

honestly i dont know but they must get there gear made somewhere as there std stoke motors make 1400hp plus at something like 12500rpm with twin 3542 veilside turbos which are based off a hks 3240

and anything that is actually veilside (not copy) is of the highest quality and kits are awesomely built but not all in my tasty(there are some nice kits tho).

ps is everyone else noticing that the gtrs turbos seem to be very high rpm to get going and only achieve small gains over the gt2560r/hks2530.

I didnt realise that jagr33 had changed to gt2560r. I might have to send him a line to see what he thinks of them compared to the trust units.

pete

ps is everyone else noticing that the gtrs turbos seem to be very high rpm to get going and only achieve small gains over the gt2560r/hks2530.

I didnt realise that jagr33 had changed to gt2560r. I might have to send him a line to see what he thinks of them compared to the trust units.

pete

how much more lag are we talking. Are the exhurst temps better on the GTRS turbos compaired to the 2530/2560r. would also like to see both of jagr33 dyno runs side by side i was lookn at the t51z.

Edited by blk180
They are actually based on IHI units. I also have a feeling that the Z-tune uses one of these 'Tomei' turbines.

Tomei and NISMO have so much gear in common now. The Z tune crank is the Tomei crank, FPRs, fuel pumps, and a few other things.

Are you sure they are IHI? Teh source for my info wasnt the greatest, so if you say so.

You are right about the Z tune though. Does anyone else find it interesting that when Nismo went about building the Z Tune they followed the Europeans by using an IHI based turbo. Mush like all the Euro manufacturers who typically use IHI or KKK ???

Could it be a killer twin setup is still out there, we need to just look to what the Euros or yanks are doign rather then the Japanese?

Are you sure they are IHI? Teh source for my info wasnt the greatest, so if you say so.

You are right about the Z tune though. Does anyone else find it interesting that when Nismo went about building the Z Tune they followed the Europeans by using an IHI based turbo. Mush like all the Euro manufacturers who typically use IHI or KKK ???

Could it be a killer twin setup is still out there, we need to just look to what the Euros or yanks are doign rather then the Japanese?

I'm 99% sure they are IHI.

IHI turbos are Japanese though. IHI stands for Ishikawajima-Harima Heavy Industries.

Pete...what sort of RPM were you seeing max torque with the 2560Rs? In all honesty, once my car was sorted, I found the GTRS's to be quite good on the stock engine. I was seeing peak torque at a touch under 5000RPM.

In a few weeks, I will be able to tell you what they are like on a fresh engine.

this car was in one of the last issues of zoom magazine. 2.8L HKS, twin GT-RS turbo's, 650 ps, 706NM of torque at a high 6100rpm.

Maybe the setup was such to bring the torque on so high?? massive cams maybe? As 6100rpm is A LOT different to Mik's peak torque at under 5000 on only a 2.6!!

I'm 99% sure they are IHI.

IHI turbos are Japanese though. IHI stands for Ishikawajima-Harima Heavy Industries.

Yeh they may be Japanese (again if you say so) but the IHI and KKK turbos are far more prevelant in European sports cars and motorsport. Asia seems to be the domain of Garretts...just an observation. For that matter US seems to be the domain of aftermarket companies basing their turbos on the Garretts, ie Innovative, Turbonetics etc

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • OK, that is a helpful description, because that sounds exactly like a bleeding issue in the clutch....these are hard to bleed manually even when the damping loop has been removed. I'd suggest bleeding again....start by filling the master cylinder up and opening the bleed nipple. Come back and check every now and then that the master cylinder is not empty. Let it gravity bleed for a few hours and see if that improves
    • I replaced the whole clutch line with the chase bays braided hose, I think it removes that loop, is it the short hose that comes immediately off the slave or is there a drawing in the manual to find what you’re referring to? It was just re-bled when I upgraded to the nismo slave, old slave worked fine but I thought that might help, didn’t change a thing. It’s like the first half of the pedal is pushing air and then when it finally actuates the master the friction zone is tiny. Makes it practically impossible to launch the car
    • Yep, that was one of the things we learned fast in the past with our MX5. When you drive with the top down, you are effectively standing out in the sun, 100% of the time, and not getting in any shade (because roads aren't shaded generally!). Just like standing out in the middle of a field on a sunny 27C day is a bit of a bad plan, so is sitting in a MX5 without sun protection.
    • I also just ordered some Frankenstein bolts and side mounts to fit a hard top Just in case I do find one, basically so it doesn't need to be fixed to the car with only the front latch.......and then gaffa tape to keep it in place for the RTN journey from wherever I get it
    • If your temps are fine now, you probably won't have any issues with where your vents are as they don't look right up at the windscreens high pressure area, so any differences when giving it the beans for extended happy laps would be minimal, but, they should vent heaps when stuck in traffic  Much like how that reverse cowl on my SS let "visible" heat out when stationary, but, because it was basically at the windscreen my coolant temps on the Hwy actually raised because air was being fed into it at speed (110kph), to only come back down to around 90° when I got off the Hwy And your 100% correct about the NC currently not needing vents, but, if I was to add a turbo, and a oil cooler and intercooler in front of the condenserand radiator, and then take it to the track???? It is apparently a recommend requirement if I don't want to worry about coolant or oil temp issues, but, any of the above are possible scenarios, over time As it sits now, with the triple pass radiator and stock air conditioning system, I have absolutely no issues with either temps or air conditioning efficiency, I've been basically daily driving thie car for the last month, both on the Hwy, and peak hour, bumper to bumper traffic, but, that's pretty much expected from basically a standard engine  Talking about no issues daily driving, it was 39° the other day and I was sitting in bumper to bumper traffic on the M5 and then M7, with the top down, and with the air conditioning blowing nice cold air on my feet, balls, and face, well, there was one issue, my head and arms got pretty sun burnt Note to self: leave a hat and sunscreen in the car for such days 🤣
×
×
  • Create New...