New Gtr Images! Leaked Early

[danh]

...but the back lacks something ( although it's good to see they retained the taillights )

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

its missing the all famous skyline writing along the back...

Oo SKYLINE oO

Edited October 20, 2005 by danh

[Tosh]

it's not a Skyline... that's why

[lingeringsoul]

just take it off an old skyline and put it onto the new one........

[danh]

i suppose it IS like a beefed up 350z

the 350 GTR

you just cant make a skyline gtr without attessa and 2 turbos

i guess thats why this is just called the "GTR"

not "skyline GTR"

[SECURITY]

the back is missing some curves. the artist drawing and the actual car have different backs. the drawing shows it as curvier, but the actual car isnt.

[Goon]

I can't believe that some people are stating the obvious that they think its computer generated. ITS FRICKEN OBVIOUS!

But that might have something to do with me being a graphics student

Nice looking car, but some people have to look past the fact that it's not a Skyline and its a whole new line (excuse the pun).

[mass_iv]

going of the photo from the tokyo motor show, i think the car looks awesome, and yeh the windows are dark, but hey its a prototype, it doesnt quiet have to be road legal!!!

i think they could have done better..

[^De_LiL_Devil^]

That's cos it's err.. NOT a skyline.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

then wot the hell is with the lights ... a bit of originality plz