Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Had my PFC tuned yesterday by CRD in Sydney and am very happy with the job they did and the end results. made 194RWKW.

My current mods are,

Pod filter

Full 3 inch exhaust and hi flow cat

boost set to about 13psi

Hybrid FMIC

Ex cam gear

PFC

Now, what to do to break 200 mark???

post-3430-1129866939.jpg

post-3430-1129867009.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/91913-pfc-tune/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 47
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Use photoshop :(

Seriously dude i wouldn't worry about the figure, 6rwkw won't make that much difference. If your happy with how the car drives/pulls then be happy, don't worry about numbers.

If you want more power, time for a new turbo, something like a HKS 2535.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/91913-pfc-tune/#findComment-1657379
Share on other sites

do u have a graph with AFR's?

what are they like?

are you planning on running 13psi all the time?

I was not given the AFR chart, I should call them, do u think they will have them saved in a database?

I may drop the boost back to 11-12psi just to be safe.

I also had compression test done all cylinders were 165-170psi. not too bad at all.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/91913-pfc-tune/#findComment-1657567
Share on other sites

I was not given the AFR chart,  I should call them, do u think they will have them saved in a database?

I may drop the boost back to 11-12psi just to be safe.

Yeah, most tuners save it and can simply recall it in a matter of seconds

I'd be dropping the boost back a couple psi :(

Ceramic wheels are your enemy

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/91913-pfc-tune/#findComment-1657593
Share on other sites

good figure, how does it drive on the street? thats all that matters really

the 194rwkw powerfc will drive heaps better than the 201rwkw safc tune

looks like boost tapers off a little, what dump / front pipe combo do you have? all in all looks good.

are you happy with how it runs? now its time to see how the fuel economy is :(

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/91913-pfc-tune/#findComment-1657848
Share on other sites

good figure, how does it drive on the street? thats all that matters really

the 194rwkw powerfc will drive heaps better than the 201rwkw safc tune

looks like boost tapers off a little, what dump / front pipe combo do you have? all in all looks good.

are you happy with how it runs? now its time to see how the fuel economy is :(

CRD pointed out the boost drop off and believe the wastegate spring may be worn and leaking pressure a bit. Not too concerned about this atm.

I just have the 3 inch dump pipe from flyn, not the split dump with seperate exhaust for the wastegate.

Drives very well, in second gear giving it a bootfull from just putting along it will break traction anywhere from 60 to 80kph easily now, although off boost there is no difference (that i can notice). To be honest i was expecting a bit of a power gain while just under normal acceleration.

Anyone know if you should get power gains under light load?

I will see how economy goes in a few weeks, at the moment i am enjoying the acceleration too much.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/91913-pfc-tune/#findComment-1658005
Share on other sites

Yeah, most tuners save it and can simply recall it in a matter of seconds

I'd be dropping the boost back a couple psi  :(

Ceramic wheels are your enemy

Already have, i am getting bad spiking from my boost controller causing massive amounts of knock. The spiking did not show up on the dyno cause they start the acceleration before the turbo has spooled up giving the bleed valve more time to adjust to the pressure changes.

The spiking is only happeneing when i put my foot down when the turbo is spooled up, so anywhere above 3000rpm.

I have dropped it back to 10 for now. sure can notice the drop in power. Knock is good now, cant make it go over 25, before i had a spike of 127 on the knock scale. Very bad i think.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/91913-pfc-tune/#findComment-1658039
Share on other sites

I agree..

Post up the AFR graph when you get it, im interested to see how they are :P

And with the boost, i would not expect the stock turbo to hold 13psi all the way to the redline, just as the graph shows.

Also with the lack of extra acceleration off boost, they probably did a full throttle tune, with not much work on the rest of the map, were u there when they tuned it?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/91913-pfc-tune/#findComment-1658948
Share on other sites

The problem with having it tuned for say 13-14psi is that if you drop it back to 11-12psi chances are the tune is not going to be optimal as the tune isn't suited to that boost level.

If the tuner has done his job properly that shouldn't be the case. Boost is irrelevant, he is tuning to airflow as the primary load source, with rpm as the secondaary reference. Turn the boost down and the airflow decreases at the same rpm, which should be reflected in the mapping (ie; the load points used). If the tuner has mapped the load points correctly then no problems, power is maximised.

:P cheers :(

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/91913-pfc-tune/#findComment-1659015
Share on other sites

If the tuner has done his job properly that shouldn't be the case.  Boost is irrelevant, he is tuning to airflow as the primary load source, with rpm as the secondaary reference.  Turn the boost down and the airflow decreases at the same rpm, which should be reflected in the mapping (ie; the load points used).  If the tuner has mapped the load points correctly then no problems, power is maximised.

:P cheers :(

I figured this is how it would work SK. Cheers for the clarification.

I am getting the AFR chart today, will post up then.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/91913-pfc-tune/#findComment-1659029
Share on other sites

And with the boost, i would not expect the stock turbo to hold 13psi all the way to the redline, just as the graph shows.

were u there when they tuned it?

Is this just the stock turbo simply running out of puff?

Does anyone else have a similar drop in pressure at high rpm with stock turbo?

The car was on the dyno from 5pm till just after 9, so 4 hours. I was there for about 4 runs on the dyno from about 7.30.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/91913-pfc-tune/#findComment-1659034
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very decent bit of kit. Definitely black it out I reckon.  
    • Because people who want that are buying euros. The people with the money to buy the aftermarket heads and blocks aren’t interested in efficiency or making -7 power, they’re making well over 1,000hp and pretty much only drive them at full throttle  best way to way make money is know your customer base and what they want and don’t spend money making things they don’t want. 
    • It's not, but it does feel like a bit of a missed opportunity regardless. For example, what if the cylinder head was redesigned to fit a GDI fuel system? It's worth like two full points of compression ratio when looking at modern GDI turbo vs PFI turbo. I'm pretty reliably surprised at how much less turbo it takes to make similar power out of a modern engine vs something like an RB26. Something with roughly the same dimensions as a -7 on an S55 is making absolutely silly power numbers compared to an RB26. I know there's a ton of power loss from things like high tension rings, high viscosity oil, clutch fan, AWD standby loss, etc but it's something like 700 whp in an F80 M3 vs 400 whp in an R33 GTR. The stock TF035HL4W turbos in an F80 M3 are really rather dinky little things and that's enough to get 400 whp at 18 psi. This just seems unwise no? I thought the general approach is if you aren't knock limited the MFB50 should be held constant through the RPM range. So more timing with RPM, but less timing with more cylinder filling. A VE-based table should accordingly inverse the VE curve of the engine.
    • I've seen tunes from big name workshops with cars making in excess of 700kW and one thing that stood out to me, is that noone is bothering with torque management. Everyone is throwing in as much timing as the motor can take for a pull. Sure that yields pretty numbers on a dyno, but it's not keeping these motors together for more than a few squirts down the straight without blowing coolant or head gaskets. If tuners, paid a bit more attention and took timing out in the mid range, managed boost a bit better, you'll probably see less motors grenading. Not to name names, or anything like that, but I've seen a tune, from a pretty wild GT-R from a big name tuner and I was but perplexed on the amount of timing jammed into it. You would have expected a quite a bit less timing at peak torque versus near the limiter, but there was literally 3 degrees of difference. Sure you want to make as much as possible throughout the RPM range, but why? At the expense of blowing motors? Anyhow I think we've gone off topic enough once again lol.
    • Because that’s not what any of them are building these heads or blocks for. It’s to hold over over 1000hp at the wheels without breaking and none of that stuff is required to make power 
×
×
  • Create New...