Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

well when the water is 15deg and your is running, the engine is cold or at least it beleives it is, so it cross refersnces this on the water temp correction page and for each degree temp range it uses a different correction value.

the water temp correction on the hand controller alters fuel. the left side is low load and the right side is high load. I guess it believes load points 0 to 10 are low, and 11 to 20 are high load points.

powerfc-water-temp-correction.JPG

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/91913-pfc-tune/page/3/#findComment-1660868
Share on other sites

  • Replies 47
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Does anyone know how to unlock the map yourself or does it have to be done by a laptop which the tuners have.

I just got back from a drive and noticed that with the a/c on it makes the knock spike even worse.  dont even need to be 1/4 throttle.  Very strange that its happening at the same rpm every time.

so they've locked out your ign maps. what pricks, i'd be spewing and going back to them straight away. as cubes said, you need the laptop software to unlock it

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/91913-pfc-tune/page/3/#findComment-1660872
Share on other sites

i have never heard of an ecu of any type that uses timing and fuel corrections to increase coolant temp, can you elaborate?

My Microtech LT-12 ecu aids in warming up by incresing the fuel supply. What the manual says: "The ECU senses the engine coolant temp (or engine head temp on air-cooled motors) and increases ot decreases the injector open time by the amount set in the Water function screen closest to the actual temperature."

Hope this helps.......... :)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/91913-pfc-tune/page/3/#findComment-1660879
Share on other sites

My Microtech LT-12 ecu aids in warming up by incresing the fuel supply. What the manual says: "The ECU senses the engine coolant temp (or engine head temp on air-cooled motors) and increases ot decreases the injector open time by the amount set in the Water function screen closest to the actual temperature."

Hope this helps.......... :)

paul i have no doubt that the ecu corrects for temp, but i still have not seen an ecu that actively speeds the warm up process using timing or fuel. afaik they all use passive sensors to gather data and then use actuators to make the engine run at it's best for a given temp.

azn this would lead me to believe that the ecu runs the engine richer and retards timing a little when it is cold which makes sense, because below a certain operating temp it lacks thermal efficiency - but not because it is trying to speed warm up. engines run cooler when they run rich.

cubes i thought engines run hotter when the timing is advanced, not retarded.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/91913-pfc-tune/page/3/#findComment-1661264
Share on other sites

Run the ignition retarded and watch those coolant temps rise. :blink:

Its mainly for emissions, brings the catalyst up to temp quicker.

hmmm...ok...i guess if you've seen it that's proof enough. just wondering why though as retarded ign means less mixture burnt? and re emmissions...why would anyone with a PFC want a function that caters to emmissions in any case?

i still reckon the only reason that they run rich / retarded when cold is to protect an engine that hasn't reached operating temp yet and is therefore thermally inefficient. can't see it as being to speed the warmup process.

cheers :blink:

Edited by Scooby
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/91913-pfc-tune/page/3/#findComment-1662290
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I have taken my car back for the knock spike and it has all been cleaned up on the map. Cant get it over 20 now. Much safer.

Just wondering about the ign correction setting. Is it safe to increase or decrease this value to get more power. If you adjust this should something else be adjusted?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/91913-pfc-tune/page/3/#findComment-1685551
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very decent bit of kit. Definitely black it out I reckon.  
    • Because people who want that are buying euros. The people with the money to buy the aftermarket heads and blocks aren’t interested in efficiency or making -7 power, they’re making well over 1,000hp and pretty much only drive them at full throttle  best way to way make money is know your customer base and what they want and don’t spend money making things they don’t want. 
    • It's not, but it does feel like a bit of a missed opportunity regardless. For example, what if the cylinder head was redesigned to fit a GDI fuel system? It's worth like two full points of compression ratio when looking at modern GDI turbo vs PFI turbo. I'm pretty reliably surprised at how much less turbo it takes to make similar power out of a modern engine vs something like an RB26. Something with roughly the same dimensions as a -7 on an S55 is making absolutely silly power numbers compared to an RB26. I know there's a ton of power loss from things like high tension rings, high viscosity oil, clutch fan, AWD standby loss, etc but it's something like 700 whp in an F80 M3 vs 400 whp in an R33 GTR. The stock TF035HL4W turbos in an F80 M3 are really rather dinky little things and that's enough to get 400 whp at 18 psi. This just seems unwise no? I thought the general approach is if you aren't knock limited the MFB50 should be held constant through the RPM range. So more timing with RPM, but less timing with more cylinder filling. A VE-based table should accordingly inverse the VE curve of the engine.
    • I've seen tunes from big name workshops with cars making in excess of 700kW and one thing that stood out to me, is that noone is bothering with torque management. Everyone is throwing in as much timing as the motor can take for a pull. Sure that yields pretty numbers on a dyno, but it's not keeping these motors together for more than a few squirts down the straight without blowing coolant or head gaskets. If tuners, paid a bit more attention and took timing out in the mid range, managed boost a bit better, you'll probably see less motors grenading. Not to name names, or anything like that, but I've seen a tune, from a pretty wild GT-R from a big name tuner and I was but perplexed on the amount of timing jammed into it. You would have expected a quite a bit less timing at peak torque versus near the limiter, but there was literally 3 degrees of difference. Sure you want to make as much as possible throughout the RPM range, but why? At the expense of blowing motors? Anyhow I think we've gone off topic enough once again lol.
    • Because that’s not what any of them are building these heads or blocks for. It’s to hold over over 1000hp at the wheels without breaking and none of that stuff is required to make power 
×
×
  • Create New...