Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hello ppls, i have just recently purchased my fist skyline (R33 Gtst)

As am not in the older part of my life (or hell even anywheres near the mid part thereof) i cannot afford insurance. So i am opting for a tracking system. What would be the best one to get????... I know they are generally about the $1500-$2000 mark + monitoring but i am happy to pay heaps more if it will get me a better system. (Considering the thousands im still not paying in insurance). I have been trying to search for "Tracker" themselves but with no luck. Does any1 have any suggestions???? Even better Contacts???

thanx -OFD14L

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/9225-tracking-systems/
Share on other sites

i know that Vision Security just released a new one to the market which actually seems to be quite good. There is a review on it in the 2002 Hot4s Yearbook... pg.124 rrp of $2200 including mapping software for your pc... My store sells it... i think it is good...not just becuase i sell it either.... i have used vision alarms for ages... good luck with it... let me know if you have any more q's :(

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/9225-tracking-systems/#findComment-138520
Share on other sites

I run quicktrack in both my cars, and my car hasn't been stolen yet.... who knows how effective it really is?

There are a few technologies, quicktrack is radio (thru buildings but limited coverage), satelite (line of sight only), gsm (mobile phone, maybe the best of both worlds).

My last car was stolen, and I'll do what I can to make sure this one doesn't got the same way.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/9225-tracking-systems/#findComment-138537
Share on other sites

i've been told navtrak is better than quick. 3 satellites being used instead of 1. 3 pt immobiliser. i think 1200 to install plus first year coverage, then 300 every year after. Apparently no car with navtrak has been stolen, but i don't think it's been around long enough for anyone to give it a good try.

cheers.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/9225-tracking-systems/#findComment-138658
Share on other sites

3rd party generally only covers up to the first $5000 of a car.. .basically its useless on any car of value. You have to go full comp if you want it insured up the full value. It stinks I reckon to pay "theft coverage" when they don't give you the full value if it is in fact stolen.

$2k seems a lot to install for a car that is maybe worth $20k.. maybe an R34 GTR it would be worth it.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/9225-tracking-systems/#findComment-138689
Share on other sites

You want to have 3rd party at least. Some guy crashed into my crap r31 and had no insurance last year. RACV sued him for me and he had to morgage his house to pay to fix my car. Dumbass. Imagine if u hit a $100,000 car, ull b in shit. $500 for 3rd party doesnt look so bad after all.

Ive heard navtrak is good, better than quiktrak. Quiktrak works on radio signal so if ur not in the city its worth shit all. GPS works everywhere.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/9225-tracking-systems/#findComment-138739
Share on other sites

SS8_Gohan

Yeah, Quicktrack is radio, not GPS, so coverage is capital city only. They also claim "no thefts", but who knows exactly what that means? The main issue with GPS is you need line of site to 3 satelites to get a fix, which won't be effective any time you park under cover.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/9225-tracking-systems/#findComment-138791
Share on other sites

Nice one thanks ppls am going to look into both this week.

as for the third party property me thinks thats just common sense. I wouldnt drive a sigi on the road without third party property!!!. Just wont be able to get the full comp :) .

So happy with my baby... when i get a digi camera will post sum pics. I knw there are so many skylines out there but this ones mine me thinks thta makes it the best looking skyline!!! :P

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/9225-tracking-systems/#findComment-138809
Share on other sites

Hi OFD14L,

I'm in the EXACT same position as you and will only be getting third party. Can you please check out both the Navtrak and QuickTrack option and decide which one is best? Ie, GPS coverage over radio coverage. Realiability, cost, and trackability like say under cover etc.

Your comments and suggestions would be greatly appreciated.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/9225-tracking-systems/#findComment-139015
Share on other sites

Originally posted by predator666

3rd party generally only covers up to the first $5000 of a car.. .basically its useless on any car of value.  You have to go full comp if you want it insured up the full value. It stinks I reckon to pay "theft coverage" when they don't give you the full value if it is in fact stolen.  

i think you got your facts mixed up....read ur 3rd party property policy again.

3rd party property covers any car or property that you damage. most insurance companies will cover up to 20 million dollars of damage.

Also most insurance companies will cover you (under 3rd party) if you were not at fault and the other person is uninsured up to the value of $3000.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/9225-tracking-systems/#findComment-139376
Share on other sites

hmm, u right when u say u must have 3rd party, its just common sense, but the thing is sometimes it aint much difference.

my mate wanted a 33 or 32, and th full comp for him with no rating was like 5-6k, but the 3rd party was still a few k aswell..it sucks but if u want these cars u gota pay it....

and 3rd party wont cover u for any reason....if someone smacks ya car up and cant pay ya pretty much screwed..insurance wont pay for u, thats why they have full comp....

and ya right about the max coverage, i think the max is 5k, so if ya car is stolen and worth 20k u get f***ed on, just gotta get full comp, its the only (kinda) safe way..

id be intereted to know about thos tracking systems too, i mean 2k is worth paying if it is in fact a mad system but if u gotta consider underground not workin etc its a total waste of money

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/9225-tracking-systems/#findComment-139452
Share on other sites

i think you got your facts mixed up....read ur 3rd party property policy again.

vishes you are correct...

and 3rd party wont cover u for any reason....if someone smacks ya car up and cant pay ya pretty much screwed..insurance wont pay for u, thats why they have full comp....

this is not 100% correct, it depends on the company and the circumstances I know that if someone smacks me and cant pay the insurance pays for me and sues them or something along these lines i forget but i was rather impressed...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/9225-tracking-systems/#findComment-139539
Share on other sites

3rd Party will cover property damage upto 10/20 million as a result of the driver's fault. The 5k or so limit is for theft, not property damage. Some 3rd party policies(like mine - suncorp) do not even cover theft.

On the issue of radio vs GPS, don't all tracking systems use radio waves? GPS uses radio waves too, just at a much higher frequency, which is why they do not go through buildings.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/9225-tracking-systems/#findComment-139628
Share on other sites

I'm not sure what's best, I took radio over GPS due to possible better recption underground. GSM (mobile) could be even better for reception though. Also remember radio only currently covers syd, melb, bris, can.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/9225-tracking-systems/#findComment-139763
Share on other sites

Jet-33, the upto 20 million property damage 3rd party will cover is for other people's properties you damage. 3rd party will not pay to fix up your car. Therefore, the maximum risk of getting 3rd party instead of comprehensive is the market value of your car in the case of a total write-off in an accident which you cause.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/9225-tracking-systems/#findComment-139973
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I have engineer in my job title One of or motto's though is "we make and we break"
    • This is actually 2 whole different trains of thought that need to be addressed separately. No, as Matt says above, "Engineer" is not a directly protected title. A lot of guys who just do mechanical design via CAD, with or without even some sort of associate diploma in engineering, often have the job title of "Design Engineer". A train driver can probably still describe themselves as an engineer. But, to usefully get employment with anyone as a proper engineer, you're going to have to have at least the necessary and relevant degree qualification. You're not going to get a job as an electrical engineer if you have a chem eng degree, unless you can demonstrate x number of years of working in that capacity, sufficient knowledge, etc. Having the degree is at least in indication that you've seen the relevant text books, even if you haven't read them (like pretty much the last 10 years of graduates!). To be a self employed engineer.....you could get away with quite a lot pretending that you're suitably qualified, without actually being a proper engineer. But, you will find yourself unable to work for a large section of the client space because a lot demand CVs and capability statements when considering contracting for any engineering work these days. Insurances too. If you're not a proper engineer, it will be much harder to obtain proper PI insurance. Insurance companies have gotten hip to that. The "Professional Engineer" thing is a thing in Australia. If you have the right qualifications and experience you can apply to the relevant engineering top level body (mostly Engineers Australia, the less said about whom, the better), to be assessed and approved as a Chartered Professional Engineer, CPE. There are high bars to get over and a requirement for CPD to maintain it. The RPEQ thing is similar-ish, in that you have to demonstrate and maintain, but the bars are a little lower. It is required to be RPEQ in order to sign off as an engineer on any engineering design in Queensland. The other states haven't fully followed suit yet. There's "engineering" and there's "engineering". Being an engineer that signs off on timber (or even steel) frames for housing projects, council creek crossing bridges, etc, is a flavour of civil engineering that barely warrants the name, description and degree. That would be soul crushing work anyway. Being an automotive engineer working in the space where you have to sign off on modifications to cars and trucks would also be similarly soul crushing. At least partly because of the level of clientelle, their expecations, depths of bank balance, etc. And that brings us to your second question. No, we do not have professional engineers "do vehicle inspections". Well, not the regular roadworthies, etc etc. That's done by mechanics. There might be some vehicle standards engineers at the various state govco inspection stations where cars go to get defects cleared and so on, but that's because they (the cars) are there specifically for defect inspection and clearance and so the stakes are a little higher than on an annual lights and brakes working check. But, if you modify a vehicle in Australia, you have to get it engineered. A suitably qualified (and effectively licensed, which I will get back to) automotive engineer will have to go over the application, advise on what would be required to make the mods legal, supervise some parts of the work, inspect and test the results, and sign off. The "licensed" aspect comes from there being a list of approved engineers to do these things in each state. They have to jump through hoops set up by the govco vehicle standards divisions that mean only the suitably qualified can offer to and approve such mods.
    • It's got a problem Prank... It looks like both washer spray caps have fallen off this car... 😛
    • Meh, it's only got to last another 10 years or so until you'll be forbidden to drive it. Keep it dry and forget about it.
    • The title of Engineer is not protected. However different states have different rules about what an Engineer requires to operate. Engineering for a motor vehicle modification is very different to engineering for a bridge, electronics, etc, including what that engineer needs as certifications.   In Canberra, "Engineer" is the loosest category with basically nothing stopping you calling yourself and engineer and designing a bridge or building. From what I've reviewed, QLD has the strictest requirements through RPEIQ.
×
×
  • Create New...