Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

The RB25DET Neo has infinitely variable VVT, unlike the RBDET non Neo which is a simple on or off. So the ECU's (inc PFC) are quite different, and the ECU pinouts (plugs) are also very different.

The easiest way (that I have found) is to use all of the parts from the same model that means sensors, harness and ECU. So you could use all R34GTT parts, just check for prices, they aren't cheap. The cheaper alternative wouldbe to use all of your current R32GTST parts. This would mean no VVT, but it would be the easiest/cheapest.

:D cheers :)

When we were doing my Neo conversion we noticed that the wiring looms between the R33 and R34 motors are really quite different.

I'd be biting the bullet and using the loom as well. If you're going to go as far as buying a new motor with the purpose of doing an engine conversion then to give yourself as little hassle as possible you really should be using the loom for that motor as well.

I put one into an R33, using an R33 loom and ecu.

The changes I needed to make were as follows:

1. CAS wiring is backwards - a simple cut and solder will work here;

2. Use an R33 throttle body to save on changing wiring there;

3. Change the plugs on the VVT and idle control valves to suit.

It'll work fine this way and you could use a R33 loom and PFC, you just wouldn't have the "infinitely" variable VVT, but the on/off system that the R33 has.

Definitely a worthwhile conversion over using an R33 RB25DET as the power delivery seems so much better - well to me anyway.

  • 2 weeks later...
2. Use an R33 throttle body to save on changing wiring there;

hi

sorry for hijacking the thread but im also about to get a rb25det neo for my r31... i get it either tomorrow or the next day... whats the problem with using the r34 throttle body... ive heard its electric or sumthing but wouldnt you just hook the accelerator cable up to some sort of sender box or is there more to it

the one im getting has gearbox, motor, new turbo, gearbox yoke, computer and wiring loom ect ect just not the actual halfcut

will i have this problem 2 or wat other problems will i discover

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Nah no bearings, just slip fit.  Would be a reasonably challenging but not impossible job to modify it to run bearings but I'm hoping that's not necessary as I may have well built one myself if I end up spending hours modifying it!
    • Brumbys with good shells are bloody expensive, I've looked at 2 "cheaper" cars, and walked away from both,  plus after some research spare parts are fairly sparce I'm starting to think that I missed the boat on finding a clean one that is straight (ish) and without alot rust I'm starting to think about a old Hilux as panels and other parts are much more available as they sold tens of thousands of them I use to be indecisive but now I'm not sure
    • A Brumby would probably fit a big metal toolbox in the back... this is how it begins  
    • Picked up a new OEM boot seal for the MX5 today as the old one got ripped a bit by me being a idiot by seeing if I could fit a large metal tool box in it, it didn't fit, and ripped the seal with the corner of the tool box I am still waiting on time to get the cams and new balancer installed, as well as the repairs to the boot Time will not be an issue soon though
    • I was more thinking so it doesn't flop around as much rather than for rotating it. Once you have the balance right, it should rotate well enough, depending on how much resistance there is on the pivot. I think you said the pivot point was on a bearing though didn't you?
×
×
  • Create New...