Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

The RB25DET Neo has infinitely variable VVT, unlike the RBDET non Neo which is a simple on or off. So the ECU's (inc PFC) are quite different, and the ECU pinouts (plugs) are also very different.

The easiest way (that I have found) is to use all of the parts from the same model that means sensors, harness and ECU. So you could use all R34GTT parts, just check for prices, they aren't cheap. The cheaper alternative wouldbe to use all of your current R32GTST parts. This would mean no VVT, but it would be the easiest/cheapest.

:D cheers :)

When we were doing my Neo conversion we noticed that the wiring looms between the R33 and R34 motors are really quite different.

I'd be biting the bullet and using the loom as well. If you're going to go as far as buying a new motor with the purpose of doing an engine conversion then to give yourself as little hassle as possible you really should be using the loom for that motor as well.

I put one into an R33, using an R33 loom and ecu.

The changes I needed to make were as follows:

1. CAS wiring is backwards - a simple cut and solder will work here;

2. Use an R33 throttle body to save on changing wiring there;

3. Change the plugs on the VVT and idle control valves to suit.

It'll work fine this way and you could use a R33 loom and PFC, you just wouldn't have the "infinitely" variable VVT, but the on/off system that the R33 has.

Definitely a worthwhile conversion over using an R33 RB25DET as the power delivery seems so much better - well to me anyway.

  • 2 weeks later...
2. Use an R33 throttle body to save on changing wiring there;

hi

sorry for hijacking the thread but im also about to get a rb25det neo for my r31... i get it either tomorrow or the next day... whats the problem with using the r34 throttle body... ive heard its electric or sumthing but wouldnt you just hook the accelerator cable up to some sort of sender box or is there more to it

the one im getting has gearbox, motor, new turbo, gearbox yoke, computer and wiring loom ect ect just not the actual halfcut

will i have this problem 2 or wat other problems will i discover

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I was more thinking so it doesn't flop around as much rather than for rotating it. Once you have the balance right, it should rotate well enough, depending on how much resistance there is on the pivot. I think you said the pivot point was on a bearing though didn't you?
    • You can get them with the worm drive rotator but I was too tight to pay another $250-$300 so manual labour it is! I don't think it will be too hard to rotate though. 
    • Sag as in the windows start to slowly open themselves, or they're just slow to go up/down with engine off?
    • It looks like it needs a big worm gear drive on it to control the rotating, not a few sloppy pins!
    • As Duncan said, first there was OBD, which few cars used, then came OBD2.   Now an interesting point, OBD2 isn't even for what you want to do. OBD2 is for emissions testing. There is some sensor data on OBD2, but it's up to the manufacturer what they're putting on it. Most scan tools operate on UDS, which like OBD2 is a standard built on-top of CAN. UDS specifies how to structure a message, what very limited things mean such as "read memory address" but it does not specify what is stored in which memory address, that is all up to the manufacturer. You either a scan tool compatible with that vehicle, or to know how to reverse engineer all the data, which can take a VERY long time and a lot of vehicles to get it right. Oh and then the manufacturer does a firmware update and changes what's where... Ask me how I know that as fact Oh, and by the time you've got the scan tool that supports all the manufacturers stuff, well, you're back at "But a consult cable and the Nissan software" The main difference being most manufacturers software these days works with the same hardware readers, as the readers are built to support J2534 which is another standard for how the PC communicates with the tool to make it do specific things on the car...
×
×
  • Create New...