Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 97
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

had a good day good to see my car is still consistant of last time it was dynoed

only thing when i went out to my car to go home i realised we did the dyno runs on 14psi instead of 16, so i would of made more kw's oh well next time i guess

good to have chat with every one cheers to paul and dark for the photos you cant see the dints in the light makes my car look great

and as ash would say internally gated screamers sound shit :(

i personally would have one external is a different story

cheers

Good effort by everyone involved in this day.

Haven't been to many SAU-Vic events at all so it was good to meet a few new ppl...

quite happy with my 172.7rwkw - considering i've only got pod, zorst and a bit more boost :( Definately gotta get me an ecu...

Hi All,

A great turnout for the day, plently of cars and some new faces too. We had cars on the dyno all day from 10:30am through to 4pm so certainly no shortage of cars. Plently of nice food and some good drinks. For those that missed out it was a good chance to run your car and check out how it compares to others and to also ask some of the finer tuners in melbourne for advice and suggestions.

All in all a great day and a fine SAU bbq. Thanks to all of those for their efforts in this event. Pics @ http://members.dodo.com.au/paul/pics/dyno-...029/page_01.htm

Thanks guys

dark had a video recorder and inark did, not sure if footage will go up. will try and sus it out

Hey Paul, If i remember correctly you had the same power - 181rwkw as on the dyno-mite dyno? Shows that the 2 dynos are pretty consistent - a good thing for comparability :D

nah i made 193 on the dynomite dyno and 181 on the ice performance one, the ramp rate on each was different so this would certainly affect it and probably why i made more on the dynomite one. we didnt have any gtr's run and dave didnt run his car

nah i made 193 on the dynomite dyno and 181 on the ice performance one, the ramp rate on each was different so this would certainly affect it and probably why i made more on the dynomite one. we didnt have any gtr's run and dave didnt run his car

hmm, how much boost were you running on the ice dyno? Cause i remember you put up a graph with 13psi and 180rwkw from the dynomite one?

same boost, havent changed my boost for like a year now

my first run on dynomite was 180rwkw then 193rwkw some time after

same boost again, just different tune and ex cam gear install (even tho it didnt add any power)

the dynomite is in shootout mode as to is the ice performance dyno.

but they can be easily turned on and off. when it in shootout mode all the parameters are locked and you cant change anything. ramp rate well means exactly that, the amount of "ramp". i believe its how much load is placed on the rear rollers to give the car something to apply its torque to, not entirely sure. but i believe the more or less ramp rate affects the output figure

yes if its run in shootout mode it prints it at the bottom. it will clearly say "shootout mode" and will print the shootout mode settings such as ramp rate, intake temp, ambient air temp etc

Hey all, I made 128.3rwkW in my r32 gtst. I was really happy with that, only mods are catback and pod filter.

Thanks to Nige and Gerald and Ash and whoever else was involved in the organisation of the day - i had a great time and it all went really smoothly.

It was a shame i rooted the calibration of my DFA so couldnt get it tuned on the day. I fixed it when i got home, it was calibrated so the output voltage was constantly a fair bit lower than it should have been, resulting in the car running lean all the way through the rev range by about 1AFR. Ill post the dyno graph at some stage, its quite remarkable how similar the AFR traces are, only shifted upwards.

Thanks to nige again for spending extra time on me and my car on the day, much apprieciated.

And to all those people who say screamer pipes on stock internal gate turbos sound shit, I thought Matts car sounded awesome!

It was pretty funny when the cops rocked up, noise complaints in an industrial estate on a saturday? I think they must have just smelled the wang burgers!

Rhett

cops came cos they thought people were drag racing

its just cos it sounds loud as all hell and the local neighbours would have rang. no biggie, they just came in for a ciggie and a chat, even said cool at the r33 on the dyno at the time

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • They are what I will be installing. 640s for me.
    • Hmm... From my experience you get about 0.25° camber change per mm of RUCA length change. So, to correct from -2.5 up to less than -1° (or, more than -1° if you look at the world as a mathematician does) then you'd be making 6-8mm of length change on the RUCA. From a stock length of 308mm, that's 2-2.5% difference in RUCA length. My RUCAs are currently very close to stock length - certainly only 2-3mm different from stock. I had to adjust my tension arms by 6mm to minimise the bump steer. That's 6mm out of 210, which is 2.8%. That's a 2.8% change on those, compared to a <1% change on the RUCAs. So the stock geometry already has worse bump steer than is possible - you can improve it even if you don't change the RUCA length. If you lengthen the RUCAs at all, then you will definitely be adding bump steer. Again, with my car, I recently had an unpleasant amount of bump steer, stemming from a number of things that happened one after another without me having an opportunity to correct for them. I only had to change the tension arm lengths by 1mm to minimise the resulting bump steer. (Granted, I also had to dial out a lot of extra toe-in in the rear, and excessive rear toe-in will make bump steer behaviour worse). Relatively tiny little adjustments having been made - the car is now completely different. Was horrifying how much it wanted to steer from the rear on any significant single wheel bump/dip. And it was even bad on expansion joints on long sweepers on freeway entry/exits, which are notionally hitting both rear wheels at the same time. My point is, the crappy Nissan multilink is quite sensitive to these things (unlike the very nice Toyota suspension!). And I think 99.75% of Skyline owners are blissfully ignorant of what they are driving around on. Sadly, it is a non-trivial exercise to set up to measure and correct bump steer. I am happy to show my rig, which involves nasty chunks of wood bolted to the hub, mirrors, lasers, graph paper targets and other horrors. Just in case anyone wants to see how it is done. I'll just have to set it up to take the photos.
    • What do you have in that bad boy ? Ill go with the 725cc since I'll be going with Nistune ( would definitely like more engine protection but Haltech is too far out of reach at the moment... plus, Ill probably have a pretty safe tune as its a daily, not gonna be chasing peak power 24/7 ahahah ). Are Xspurt a safe choice?  Pete's great. He didnt mention anything about traction arm length so I reckon it may be good. When I get some new wheels/tire later down the road I'll ask him about it and get his opinion on em. I heard from Gary that you've got the bilsteins too, are you running the sway bars too? and what other suspension goodies do you have installed or would recommend?
    • In true Gregging style...  
×
×
  • Create New...