Jump to content
SAU Community

13.4 second 1/4 for your 'stockish' R33. (A how to guide).


Recommended Posts

i got a 13.981 at calder last night... could have probably done better, but happy for a first real strip run. Set my 235/45 tyres to 16psi and I have pineapples on the back - seem to have less traction probs than some of the other gts-t boys who also ran.

Originally posted by predator666

i got a 13.981 at calder last night... could have probably done better, but happy for a first real strip run. Set my 235/45 tyres to 16psi and I have pineapples on the back - seem to have less traction probs than some of the other gts-t boys who also ran.

What mods do you have??

a few :P its not really "stockish" though as the thread indicates...ah well..

S-AFC, cold air intake, dump pipe, hi-flow CAT, HKS Super Dragger II cat-back, blitz pod, HKS FMIC, ProfecB EBC, heavy duty clutch, pineapples, zeal coilovers, falken 235/45R17.. stock ECU, stock Turbo @ 13psi

i think some heat buildup and trying a bit too hard could have effected my later runs.. i'm gonna wrap some of my piping soonish to maybe fix that for next time.

thanx :( other runs were around mid-14 at higher MPH (~100).

Its all in the takeoff, which i'm sure you know, but its definitely what I found out on friday. The difference between a 14 sec run and a 13 second run is all in a good takeoff.

Easier just to just post the timesheet with the 60', etc.

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/at...=&postid=259667

If I can get that a bit lower (which I think I can next time), I think I may be able to get about a 13.6 or something with a perfect launch and my current mods. I'll be happy with that until I one day I upgrade the turbo, ecu and maybe a couple of other things which should push me into the 12's. 12's for a daily driver that is RWD would be pretty nice I reckon :(

anyway, enough about me.. back to general discussion

yeah.. other runs were worse launches, but better shifting after that, resulting in higher top speed of around 101mph

If i can pull both off in the one run i'll get somewhere around the mid-13 i think as well.. tyre pressure could have been a bit low @ 16psi for street tyres??

I ran 14.370 @ 98.79, 60' 2.407 with a pod (no cai) and a 3" cat back zorst. I believe that 60' time could come down a few tenths with a bit of practice (I only had 3 runs on the day).

I just dont get it. predator666 you've got some decent mods I'm guessing they'd be around $2k rrp? Surely to goodness your $2k mods are more than 0.3sec better than my $400 mods? It looks like you can launch it better than I can also.

A question for all: How much did you spend (and on what), and what affect did it have on your times???

Most of the stuff came on my car.. but if u added them up prolly $6000-$7000 or so :P read back a page for the full list. 0.3 is a reasonable difference.. and 1 second is a massive difference in terms of what you need to do to your car most of the time.

That run i felt like a pretty perfect launch, and i took it a lot more easy on the gear changes afterwards. Maybe i backed off right at the end? (no idea). Anyway, its all in the timesheet up above, i'm no expert, and i don't remember every single detail! I only had about 4 runs.. next time i go, i'll hopefully have some more runs, and hopefully get a better time as a result of the practise.

Guest MFX_R33

Waming up your tyres with a burnout is good for show, but not really going to help you on street tyres.

I ran at eastern creek again last night and got a 13.102 @ 108.46 mph, killing my old time of 13.7 @ 105. I was much happier. My 60ft this time was much better, of 2.114 over 2.365.

I walked away grinning from ear to ear (I was hoping for a 13.4) :) :) .

Jeff.

Guest MFX_R33

I have standard internals, injectors and fuel pump. I am running a custom plenum, XF trottle body, FMIC, EMS management, high flowed turbo (metal wheels, no bb centre), running 17psi boost, exhaust, etc.. The tyres are 255/35R18 Fulda street tyres let down to 20psi.

Here is a pic of my engine bay,

http://www.mfx.com.au/team/prgen.jpg

Jeff.

Guest MFX_R33

They are close but still handling it. We have looked at them closely on the Dyno, but they are still upto the task at the moment. I am looking at a bigger turbo at the moment, so I will have to do something about the fuel system soon.

Jeff.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I mean this in no disrespect to u mate; Are there clear tagged examples/explanations in our SAU forum for example, in my interest, this is how to do R34 Gtt suspension the right way? U guys did so much taking risks with experimentation that deserves recognition and those results helps us morons take the RIGHT path to buy quality / buy once. 🍻
    • Pretty much what you'd expect at that power level. Hypergear turbo, long list of supporting mods, full Haltech catalogue, etc.  I'd say this goes for most drivers, suspension is still a dark art for most people. And it's really hard to convince someone how much better their setup could be...  
    • They are what I will be installing. 640s for me.
    • Hmm... From my experience you get about 0.25° camber change per mm of RUCA length change. So, to correct from -2.5 up to less than -1° (or, more than -1° if you look at the world as a mathematician does) then you'd be making 6-8mm of length change on the RUCA. From a stock length of 308mm, that's 2-2.5% difference in RUCA length. My RUCAs are currently very close to stock length - certainly only 2-3mm different from stock. I had to adjust my tension arms by 6mm to minimise the bump steer. That's 6mm out of 210, which is 2.8%. That's a 2.8% change on those, compared to a <1% change on the RUCAs. So the stock geometry already has worse bump steer than is possible - you can improve it even if you don't change the RUCA length. If you lengthen the RUCAs at all, then you will definitely be adding bump steer. Again, with my car, I recently had an unpleasant amount of bump steer, stemming from a number of things that happened one after another without me having an opportunity to correct for them. I only had to change the tension arm lengths by 1mm to minimise the resulting bump steer. (Granted, I also had to dial out a lot of extra toe-in in the rear, and excessive rear toe-in will make bump steer behaviour worse). Relatively tiny little adjustments having been made - the car is now completely different. Was horrifying how much it wanted to steer from the rear on any significant single wheel bump/dip. And it was even bad on expansion joints on long sweepers on freeway entry/exits, which are notionally hitting both rear wheels at the same time. My point is, the crappy Nissan multilink is quite sensitive to these things (unlike the very nice Toyota suspension!). And I think 99.75% of Skyline owners are blissfully ignorant of what they are driving around on. Sadly, it is a non-trivial exercise to set up to measure and correct bump steer. I am happy to show my rig, which involves nasty chunks of wood bolted to the hub, mirrors, lasers, graph paper targets and other horrors. Just in case anyone wants to see how it is done. I'll just have to set it up to take the photos.
    • What do you have in that bad boy ? Ill go with the 725cc since I'll be going with Nistune ( would definitely like more engine protection but Haltech is too far out of reach at the moment... plus, Ill probably have a pretty safe tune as its a daily, not gonna be chasing peak power 24/7 ahahah ). Are Xspurt a safe choice?  Pete's great. He didnt mention anything about traction arm length so I reckon it may be good. When I get some new wheels/tire later down the road I'll ask him about it and get his opinion on em. I heard from Gary that you've got the bilsteins too, are you running the sway bars too? and what other suspension goodies do you have installed or would recommend?
×
×
  • Create New...