Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 146
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

yeah i have a document must be the one u refer to. in pdf

has some graphs etc. the t04r is very insuperior to the t04z regards to responsiveness and boost building capabilities.

i would love more mid range like a t04z but this is the real world!

lol just been out for some 'testing' its great with a launch pulls great through all the gears...

pity williwbank isn ton this weds :D

excelent work.

it seems that your boost control problems are long gone :D

:D il have to pull my finger out and get my motor going!!!

hehehe yes all good. :D

thanks v much for everyones help in that thread.

pity im only running 18psi, i really thought i might have to run over 20psi to make 400kw.

:)

mick

hehehe yes all good. :)

thanks v much for everyones help in that thread.

pity im only running 18psi, i really thought i might have to run over 20psi to make 400kw.

:)

mick

so whens the plan to pump more boost into it? :)

btw love ya gtr mate it looks awesome :)

hehe, all at a time.

im still stock fuel rail, pretty stock fuel system, intank pump.

so we was seeing its starting to get to its limits at the top...

will go and race like this see how it goes, then make some improvements..

:)

Hi WRXKilla well done mate. Very interesting power curve there. The t04r is meant to be very similar to the t04z except t04z is ball bearing . Im thinking there must be more differences then that to improve its response time. I have another graph to post up showing boost pressure might be interesting to compare how they ramp up.

post-3878-1130849588.jpg

Edited by R32-GTS

Also that is very good power your making for 18psi at that boost i think im only making 400rwkw's at 18psi. I managed to get a 10.9 with 425rwkw's on street tyres with 1.6 60 ft times . It had more in it but i had to baby third gear in the stock box to avoid breaking it. The box exploded the next day anyway. Start saving for a gearset !

Also that is very good power your making for 18psi at that boost i think im only making 400rwkw's at 18psi. I managed to get a 10.9 with 425rwkw's on street tyres with 1.6 60 ft times . It had more in it but i had to baby third gear in the stock box to avoid breaking it. The box exploded the next day anyway. Start saving for a gearset !

The t04r is meant to be very similar to the t04z except t04z is ball bearing

From what I have heard (and seen in the results) the T04Z utilises a much later generation of aerodynamics. So much so that, when HKS asked for upgrading potential for their T04Z version, the Garret enginers laughed at them.

I am busting to find a compressor map for a T04Z, I have a rule that says "don't use a turbo until you have checked out the compressor map" to make sure it does what I want. I don't want to break one of my own rules.

:) cheers :)

Edited by Sydneykid

I just decided i would try it and see how it went as i thought a gt35r would be slightly too small for what i wanted. The t04z ended up been an excellent choice in terms of lag vs power. Comes on boost sooner then a mates gtr with HKS 2530's but just keeps powering in the top end.

I wonder if there is any difference between the HKS T04Z and the Garrett T04Z?

I believe it is only that "anti-surge" compressor cover ? (ie. the holes drilled into the compressor cover) ??? Can anyone confirm this? :)

Oh, and the HKS label which adds 50kw :)

Edited by Wobbz

I have it on good authority that the HKS and garrett are the same sans the sexy front cover.... this is not normally the case with the similar turbos i.e. GTRS and GTSS or 2530 equiv.....

SK TO4Z you know you want to!!!!! 800hp from a 3ltr? hmmm

oh and Morgs u have to throw up a dyno sheet next week :P

yeah all the people saying they should be similar.

actually check it out.

the t04z is a FAR superior turbo than the T04r. i refuse to compare results. :P

appreciate everyones feedback keep it coming.

but yeah i couldnt find comp maps for t04 & t04z sk, if you can that would be great!!!

R32GTS, thanks for your info, i find that helpful for sure.

thanks

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • When I need something else to edit, I use Movavi. A friend who does video editing on a daily basis recommended me) it's an easy video cutter to use for beginners
    • I need to edit some videos for work but I'm not good at all this. Which video editor can you recommend?
    • I think you're really missing the point. The spec is just the minimum spec that the fuel has to meet. The additive packages can, and do, go above that minimum if the fuel brand feels they need/want to. And so you get BP Ultimate or Shell Ultra (or whatever they call it) making promises to clean your engine better than the standard stuff....simply because they do actually put better additive packages in there. They do not waste special sauce on the plebian fuel if they can avoid it. I didn't say "energy density". I just said "density". That's right, the specific gravity (if you want to use a really shit old imperial description for mass per unit volume). The density being higher indicates a number of things, from reduces oxygen content, to increased numbers of double bonds or cyclic components. That then just happens to flow on to the calorific value on a volume basis being correspondingly higher. The calorific value on a mass basis barely changes, because almost all hydrocarbon materials have a very similar CV per kg. But whatever - the end result is that you do get a bit more energy per litre, which helps to offset some of the sting of the massive price bump over 91. I can go you one better than "I used to work at a fuel station". I had uni lecturers who worked at the Pt Stanvac refinery (at the time they were lecturing, as industry specialist lecturers) who were quite candid about the business. And granted, that was 30+ years ago, and you might note that I have stated above that I think the industry has since collected together near the bottom (quite like ISPs, when you think about it). Oh, did I mention that I am quite literally a combustion engineer? I'm designing (well, actually, trying to avoid designing and trying to make the junior engineer do it) a heavy fuel oil firing system for a cement plant in fricking Iraq, this week. Last week it was natural gas fired this-that. The week before it was LPG fired anode furnaces for a copper smelter (well, the burners for them, not the actual furnaces, which are just big dumb steel). I'm kinda all over fuels.
    • Well my freshly rebuilt RB25DET Neo went bang 1000kms in, completely fried big end bearing in cylinder 1 so bad my engine seized. No knocking or oil pressure issue prior to this happening, all happened within less than a second. Had Nitto oil pump, 8L baffled sump, head drain, oil restrictors, the lot put in to prevent me spinning a bearing like i did to need the rebuild. Mechanic that looked after the works has no idea what caused it. Reckoned it may have been bearing clearance wrong in cylinder 1 we have no idea. Machinist who did the work reckoned it was something on the mechanic. Anyway thats between them, i had no part in it, just paid the money Curiosity question, does the oil system on RB’s go sump > oil pump > filter > around engine? If so, if you had a leak on an oil filter relocation plate, say sump > oil pump > filter > LEAK > around engine would this cause a low oil pressure reading if the sensors was before the filter?   TIA
    • But I think you missed mine.. there is also nothing about the 98 spec that supports your claim..  according to the fuel standards, it can be identical to 95, just very slightly higher octane number. But the ulp vs pulp fuel regulations go show 95 (or 98), is not just 91 with some additives. any claim of ‘refined by the better refineries’ or ‘higher quality fuel’ is just hearsay.  I have never seen anything to back up such claims other than ‘my mate used to work for a fuel station’, or ‘drove a fuel delivery truck’, or ‘my mechanic says’.. the actual energy densities do slightly vary between the 3 grades of fuel, but the difference is very minor. That said, I am very happy to be proven wrong if anyone has some hard evidence..
×
×
  • Create New...