Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 146
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

yeah i have a document must be the one u refer to. in pdf

has some graphs etc. the t04r is very insuperior to the t04z regards to responsiveness and boost building capabilities.

i would love more mid range like a t04z but this is the real world!

lol just been out for some 'testing' its great with a launch pulls great through all the gears...

pity williwbank isn ton this weds :D

  T04GTR said:
excelent work.

it seems that your boost control problems are long gone :D

:D il have to pull my finger out and get my motor going!!!

hehehe yes all good. :D

thanks v much for everyones help in that thread.

pity im only running 18psi, i really thought i might have to run over 20psi to make 400kw.

:)

mick

  wrxkilla said:
hehehe yes all good. :)

thanks v much for everyones help in that thread.

pity im only running 18psi, i really thought i might have to run over 20psi to make 400kw.

:)

mick

so whens the plan to pump more boost into it? :)

btw love ya gtr mate it looks awesome :)

hehe, all at a time.

im still stock fuel rail, pretty stock fuel system, intank pump.

so we was seeing its starting to get to its limits at the top...

will go and race like this see how it goes, then make some improvements..

:)

Hi WRXKilla well done mate. Very interesting power curve there. The t04r is meant to be very similar to the t04z except t04z is ball bearing . Im thinking there must be more differences then that to improve its response time. I have another graph to post up showing boost pressure might be interesting to compare how they ramp up.

post-3878-1130849588.jpg

Edited by R32-GTS

Also that is very good power your making for 18psi at that boost i think im only making 400rwkw's at 18psi. I managed to get a 10.9 with 425rwkw's on street tyres with 1.6 60 ft times . It had more in it but i had to baby third gear in the stock box to avoid breaking it. The box exploded the next day anyway. Start saving for a gearset !

Also that is very good power your making for 18psi at that boost i think im only making 400rwkw's at 18psi. I managed to get a 10.9 with 425rwkw's on street tyres with 1.6 60 ft times . It had more in it but i had to baby third gear in the stock box to avoid breaking it. The box exploded the next day anyway. Start saving for a gearset !

  R32-GTS said:
The t04r is meant to be very similar to the t04z except t04z is ball bearing

From what I have heard (and seen in the results) the T04Z utilises a much later generation of aerodynamics. So much so that, when HKS asked for upgrading potential for their T04Z version, the Garret enginers laughed at them.

I am busting to find a compressor map for a T04Z, I have a rule that says "don't use a turbo until you have checked out the compressor map" to make sure it does what I want. I don't want to break one of my own rules.

:) cheers :)

Edited by Sydneykid

I just decided i would try it and see how it went as i thought a gt35r would be slightly too small for what i wanted. The t04z ended up been an excellent choice in terms of lag vs power. Comes on boost sooner then a mates gtr with HKS 2530's but just keeps powering in the top end.

  WetGTR said:
I wonder if there is any difference between the HKS T04Z and the Garrett T04Z?

I believe it is only that "anti-surge" compressor cover ? (ie. the holes drilled into the compressor cover) ??? Can anyone confirm this? :)

Oh, and the HKS label which adds 50kw :)

Edited by Wobbz

I have it on good authority that the HKS and garrett are the same sans the sexy front cover.... this is not normally the case with the similar turbos i.e. GTRS and GTSS or 2530 equiv.....

SK TO4Z you know you want to!!!!! 800hp from a 3ltr? hmmm

oh and Morgs u have to throw up a dyno sheet next week :P

yeah all the people saying they should be similar.

actually check it out.

the t04z is a FAR superior turbo than the T04r. i refuse to compare results. :P

appreciate everyones feedback keep it coming.

but yeah i couldnt find comp maps for t04 & t04z sk, if you can that would be great!!!

R32GTS, thanks for your info, i find that helpful for sure.

thanks

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Good morning all, Bit of a random question but figured I’d finally throw it out after wondering for a long while. Before I start, I'm hoping to do this purely out of personal preference. I think it would look better at night, and don't mind at all spending a few hours and dollars to get it done. I've copied this from a non-Skyline specific forum, so I apologize for the explanation of our headlight switch setup that we all know. Here we go: Zero lights (switch off) Parking lights (switch position 1) being a rectangular marker on the outside of the housing, my low beam being the projector in the centre (position 2), and a high beam triggered by my turn signal stalk. Most North American cars I’ve owned of this era have power to the amber corner (turning indicator) light as part of the first switch (parking lights). I’d love to have these amber corners receive power when the headlights and parking lights are on (headlight switch), yet still blink when using the turn signal which is of course a separate switch. Hopefully I’ve explained my question correctly. Is anyone aware of a way in which I might be able to achieve this? Thanks in advance
    • My heads are cathedral port! It's likely possible, but I don't want to add any extra moving parts (I know they don't move) between the heads, manifolds, etc. It will also affect how injectors/fuel rails etc sit and I don't really know if it would change how the FAST manifold goes/sits/fits. I have the LS6 steam pipes already as I have a very late LS1 block so it should be fine. I couldn't find anyone who had ever actually used one for this purpose, it seems 100% of people grind the water pump. The thermal spacers are 12mm and are half way to the cost of the newer water pump anyhow... so if it comes to that I suppose I'd rather buy a new pump. The bearing in the pump I do have is a little.. clunky, but it hasn't done that much time and I never noticed it when the car was together in the past few years, so..
    • The bushing has failed, not all that uncommon for a car of this age.  Any mechanic should be able to push in a new bushing for you, or you can probably buy the entire lower control arm, complete with bushes.
    • Could you not use "thermal" spacers to give the clearance, like the ones I used between the blower and head? That raised the manifold height by around 10-15mm Albeit the ones I used were for cathedral ports, but I assume they have similar for rectangular ports????
    • Thanks Paul I reached out to Autotainment but they no longer work on JDM cars as the guy who used to do the work moved on and is no longer doing that kind of work. I am talking with Level Up Audio though.
×
×
  • Create New...