Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

Am fitting some Garrett 2560r to replace the stock turbos on my R32 GTR.

A couple of people have mentioned fitting some sort of oil restrictor on the oil lines to the turbos to reduce the flow of oil to them (and increase it in the motor?)

I would have thought that the lines on the turbos/GTR would already have this sorted... and I am concerned about what to do here.. I especially do not want to 'under' supply oil to the turbos of course..

Can anyone give me the low-down on why/how this is done? Or should it be left well alone? :P

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/93332-oil-restrictors-for-turbos-on-gtr/
Share on other sites

Why is it necessary, because standard turbos are plain bearing and the Garrett 2560R's are ball bearing. Plain bearing turbos rely on the oil for lubrication and pressure plus cooling. Ball bearing turbos only use the oil for lubrication. So they need reduced flow and pressure. Usually Garrett turbos come with flow restrictors standard. Check yours before you start trying to buy them, as they may already have them.

:P cheers :)

Why is it necessary, because standard turbos are plain bearing and the Garrett 2560R's are ball bearing.  Plain bearing turbos rely on the oil for lubrication and pressure plus cooling.  Ball bearing turbos only use the oil for lubrication.  So they need reduced flow and pressure.  Usually Garrett turbos come with flow restrictors standard.  Check yours before you start trying to buy them, as they may already have them.

:) cheers :P

I hate to appear stupid... (but I am so ~good~ at it :P )

How would I check for this and what am I looking for? ie I don't know what the 'standard size' should look like, so I'm not sure if I look at it whether I will know if it has a restrictor fitted or not... :P

Has anyone got a pic by chance?

Why is it necessary, because standard turbos are plain bearing and the Garrett 2560R's are ball bearing.  Plain bearing turbos rely on the oil for lubrication and pressure plus cooling.  Ball bearing turbos only use the oil for lubrication.  So they need reduced flow and pressure.  Usually Garrett turbos come with flow restrictors standard.  Check yours before you start trying to buy them, as they may already have them.

:P cheers :)

Better still! I just remembered I took some photos. Do either of these show what we are looking for?

http://dsl-202-72-159-143.wa.westnet.com.a...4%20(Large).jpg

or close up:

http://dsl-202-72-159-143.wa.westnet.com.a...3%20(Large).jpg

Cheers!

hi i have fitted a few different garret turbo's to rb 26 and most of them will need a restrictor , rb 26 engines have one of the most high oil pressures out of everything i have had instances where engines have been making 50 psi oil pressure at idle , this is to much for a ball bearing turbo turbo at idling speeds and will push oil past the seals and cause it to blow blue smoke at idle ,you need to be using between .9 and 1.1 mm restrictor it does not have to be built into the turbo it can be anywhere in the supply line this will drop your idling pressure to around 10 - 14 psi the oil pressure will increase as the engines revs increase , it would pay to put a oil pressure gauge after the restrictor so you can keep an eye on it

as far as i know (and please don't take this as gospel) the restrictor for those garretts should be .8mm or .9mm. and i am 90% sure it's built in and does not require an external restrictor in the feed line. if in doubt ring the turbo supplier and ask them. better to be safe!

as far as i know (and please don't take this as gospel) the restrictor for those garretts should be .8mm or .9mm. and i am 90% sure it's built in and does not require an external restrictor in the feed line. if in doubt ring the turbo supplier and ask them. better to be safe!

Cheers - I think I'll follow that advice and give them a ring..

do the pictures in the link I posted above show you at all? (ie is this the part I am supposed to be looking at?)

I would have thought that as they are a specific turbo to GTR's then they should already have the correct one fitted?

In that photo, the number '14411-AA403' is the part number for an R34 GTR V-spec II turbo.

Generally 'genuine' Garrett turbo's have the correct restrictor built into the cartridge (centre) as suggested, but Nissan OEM turbo's usually have the restrictor as part of the banjo bolts in the oil feed lines.

In that photo, the number '14411-AA403' is the part number for an R34 GTR V-spec II turbo.

Generally 'genuine' Garrett turbo's have the correct restrictor built into the cartridge (centre) as suggested, but Nissan OEM turbo's usually have the restrictor as part of the banjo bolts in the oil feed lines.

Hmm.. well that is interesting. The 707160-7 has more or less the same specs as the HKS GT-SS turbos. So do you think the R34 VSpec II has the equiv of GT-SS turbos? Possible I suppose?

I just hope they go well... are these the equiv to N1's? (or are all these the same even??)

as far as i know (and please don't take this as gospel) the restrictor for those garretts should be .8mm or .

correct, garrett BB turbos (from what ive seen) all carry an internal restrictor on the actual cartridge.

There is absolutely no need to ass one into the lines externally at any point.

I never ran an external one on my GT30, just used the internal one that was on the turbo itself... no issues

So do you think the R34 VSpec II has the equiv of GT-SS turbos?  Possible I suppose?

I just hope they go well...  are these the equiv to N1's? (or are all these the same even??)

I think GT-SS is good for something like 300+ps, which I think would be closer to the N1's, but I don't claim to be an expert on these.

That cone shaped gadget is the top of a tubular device that locates in a hole through the bearing cartridge and I'm told doubles as the oil flow regulator or restrictor . Those who removed it found out the hard way what happens when the bearing cartridge shunts backwards and forwards letting the wheels get close up and personal with their housings .

My personal experience is buy turbo , fit inverted flare adapter and plumb as for any other turbo .

There used to be some pictures floating around the net of a sectioned BB turbo and you can see this hollow mushroom headed locating pin type thing in it .

Cheers A .

Hi all,

Am fitting some Garrett 2560r to replace the stock turbos on my R32 GTR.

A couple of people have mentioned fitting some sort of oil restrictor on the oil lines to the turbos to reduce the flow of oil to them (and increase it in the motor?)

I would have thought that the lines on the turbos/GTR would already have this sorted...  and I am concerned about what to do here..  I especially do not want to 'under' supply oil to the turbos of course..

Can anyone give me the low-down on why/how this is done? Or should it be left well alone?    :rolleyes:

r32tt the best thing for you to do is go to turbotec and order to 0.8mm oil resistors for the gt2560r and they will fit them for you the resistors are $40 each and worth every dollar. Tell them pete for bunbury sent you shouldn't be a problem.

the reason for the resistor change is the garret ball bearing turbo is only good for 60psi oil pressure and like sk said the ball bearing turbo doesn't require the quality of oil the std turbo do. the result of this is the turbo when motor is cool (high oil pressure) and is starting to get into boost and a few revs can pass a bit of oil and resulting white smoke so i use to have to be very carefull to full warm the motor up, since i have had the resistors fitted after talking to garret australia and turbotec the problem has been solved and i have three cars running the resistors now.

pete

ps hope it helps

the garret turbo gt2560 comes with 1.2mm resistor in the 707160-5 i would think the -7 would be the same

can i ask why you picked the -7 over the -5

Cheers for that Pete,

Hmm. Ian from Turbotech was in the workshop just yesterday and said there was no need to add restrictors - that the Turbo already had sufficient ones. But he made no mention of whether they were 0.8mm, or 1.2mm. Just said not to worry. Who were you talking to at Turbotech - do you know?

I ended up going for the -7 in the end because it more or less matches the specs on the HKS GT-SS, and from what I have read they seem to come on a fair bit earlier than the HKS2530 (or -5 equiv).. I understand they won't make quite the same top end, but its street response and circuit racing I am interested in - not drags or dyno. Unfortunately I haven't been able to 'try' each one - so I had to make a best guess based on all the reading and advice.

Hopefully I've made the right choice for my application.. will see soon eh!

:P

Service Manager Small Turbo's : Geoff Haley

is the guy to talk to and i would replace the 1.2mm with 0.8mm as it was recommend by garret australia after i had the problems i did and geoff flow test the results on the test bench.

r32tt the best thing for you to do is go to turbotec and order to 0.8mm oil resistors for the gt2560r and they will fit them for you the resistors are $40 each and worth every dollar. Tell them pete for bunbury sent you shouldn't be a problem.

the reason for the resistor change is the garret ball bearing turbo is only good for 60psi oil pressure and like sk said the ball bearing turbo doesn't require the quality of oil the std turbo do. the result of this is the turbo when motor is cool (high oil pressure) and is starting to get into boost and a few revs can pass a bit of oil and resulting white smoke so i use to have to be very carefull to full warm the motor up, since i have had the resistors fitted after talking to garret australia and turbotec the problem has been solved and i have three cars running the resistors now.

pete

ps hope it helps

Pete am I reading this correctly ie you run two restrictors?

Service Manager Small Turbo's : Geoff Haley

is the guy to talk to and i would replace the 1.2mm with 0.8mm as it was recommend by garret australia after i had the problems i did and geoff flow test the results on the test bench.

Since the turbos are bolted in - and it may be hard to get to now - is it ok to put a 0.8mm restrictor inline somewhere else? I assume a 0.8mm that then goes to a 1.2mm will still be the equiv of replacing the 1.2mm will it? (or will they kind of sum and result in lower pressure still?)

What's the damage likely if I "try it" with just the 1.2mm.. ie is it ok to try and then fit a 0.8mm inline if I have the symptoms? Or have I 'stuffed it' if they get too much pressure?

Pete am I reading this correctly ie you run two restrictors?

one in each turbo you replace the std 1.2mm with a 0.8mm as well the restrictor serves as the location pin for the bearing cluster .

Since the turbos are bolted in - and it may be hard to get to now - is it ok to put a 0.8mm restrictor inline somewhere else?  I assume a 0.8mm that then goes to a 1.2mm will still be the equiv of replacing the 1.2mm will it?  (or will they kind of sum and result in lower pressure still?)

What's the damage likely if I "try it" with just the 1.2mm..  ie is it ok to try and then fit a 0.8mm inline if I have the symptoms?  Or have I 'stuffed it' if they get too much pressure?

if there to hard to replace know you are most likely best to leave as is, as mine run for two year before i had an issue BUT you must be very carefull not to get on the gas while the motor is still cold as the pressure will bypass the seals and premature age the seals, i only had mine fail after leaving my car in the care of my brother while i was off shore not only did it have panel damage wheni got back but the seal begain to fail I believe from my brother thrashing when cold ,plus just to top it off the rings in 5 and 6 started to pass and that is why i had to bring my rebuild forward 6 months, needless to say i nearly strangled him when i got back, f**king idolt.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I had absolutely no symptoms whatsoever that anything was wrong.... I'm very happy it was all spotto'd and re-bled and re-torqued and aligned though. Will be picking it up tomorrow and undoubtedly be like "Oh, that clunk is gone" "Oh, the car really wants to drive straight" "Oh, that pedal feels better" "Oh, it feels like I've gained 25hp" "Oh, the handbrake works now" It should have been a sign that the new Project Mu shoes had 3mm of pad depth on them out of the box, and the OEM ones from 25 years ago that we took out also had 3mm of pad depth, implying the issue was not, and never was the shoes, but we put that down to it not being adjusted correctly. It wasn't, but it wasn't even adjustable at all given one side was boned and the T Junction of the cables was on a 45 degree angle, the non-working side being the one on the massive angle. Obviously when I had adjusted it and reset it and re-tensioned it I had either got it stuck or something along those lines. Oh well. Live and learn and absolutely could have been catastrophically worse so I'm rationalizing it as a win, kinda. I also got the chance to measure the distance between rear rim and the suspension arm/shocks and found a 30mm rubber block only just doesn't fit there. Which is great to know before ordering wheels, when I assumed 30mm was easy. The man with the Porsche adapters has rims that use 23.9mm of that space, so it's safe to assume I have between 23.9 and 29.9mm of space there to play with on the inside. The wheels looked pretty stupidly pokey with the 20mm spacers on the rear, only for me to find that the studs come out another 12mm and the wheel doesn't actually sit flush with the hub because you're supposed to cut your original studs. The wheels do have cutouts that kinda accomodate it, but not fully. So my 20mm spacer was anywhere between 25mm and 35mm. ~25mm and send it will determine on where the wheels sit with the spacers on. When I put the pads in for the track day I will mess around with spacers (with wheels that do not clear studs properly when mounted to spacers) and do more math, for the last time, for the 7th time.
    • Lucky pick up Best to find these things before something horrible happened to the yoke flange thingies I would hate to think what would happen if it dropped the tailshaft  Hopefully the holes are not flogged out in the yokes and it was just the bolts that got munted  As for the hand brake.....ouch, look like the disc got rather hot, and I assume smokey, I recall when I had a front caliper seize on the Commodore, there was lots of smoke and the disc was glowing cherry red when I was able to eventually stop and have a look, and stopping a big heavy car, going down a big hill with some rather high RPM down shifts and some hand brake action is something that makes you think hard about life
    • One of the things that never seemed right was the handbrake. Put in some nice new Project Mu shoes. We figured the rears were out, so why not. We're right there. My handbrake never worked well anyway. Well, this is them, 15km later. 67fdcf94-9763-4522-97a4-8f04b2ad0826.mp4 Keen eyes would note the difference in this picture too:   And this picture: Also, this was my Tailshaft bolts: 4ad3c7dd-51d0-4577-8e72-ba8bc82f6e87.mp4 It turns out my suspicions that one side of the handbrake cable was stretched all along were pretty accurate, as was my intuition that I didn't want to drop the tailshaft to swap them on jack stands and wasn't entirely sure about bolt torque. I have since bought the handbrake cables which have gone in. I'm very glad that I went to my mechanic friend who owns an alignment machine to get an alignment before the track day, because his eyes spotted these various levels of "WHAT THE f**k IS GOING ON HERE?". Turns out the alignment wasn't that bad, considering we changed the adjustable castor arms out for un-adjustable castor arms, and messed with the heights. Car drove pretty good with one side of the handbrake stuck on, unbleedable rear brakes, alignment screwy, and the tailshaft about to go flying and generally being a death trap waiting to happen! (I did have covid) (I maintain I adjusted the handbrake correctly, but movement caused shennanigans and/or I dislodged the spring on the problem side somewhat, or god knows what). G R E G G E D
    • Very interesting, im not sure how all those complications fit in to running a haltech instead of a stock ecu but I'm starting to think I'm a bit out of my league.
    • I just put 2 and 2 together. This is a Neo converted R32. The Neo ECU (in concert with the R34's AC controller) runs the AC quite differently to how the R32 ECU and AC controller do it. If you just drop it all in, it won't work. There is some tricky wiring required, including changing to the pressure switch that the Neo controllers want to see. I don't know what it is, because mine was done by a guru. It was a year or so after I did that transplant before he worked out what needed to be done.
×
×
  • Create New...