Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

In need of a new AFM soon (upgrading cefiro loom, ecu etc with r32 components, long story.....) and curious if the Z32 AFM will work with a standard r32 rb20det ecu? i'm guessing it may run a little more rich but other then that should it idle, run just like normal? (would prefer upgrading now to the z32 while i need a AFM rather then later buying another one when i upgrade ecu)

Btw i've done a few searches but with no luck...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/93874-z32-afm-on-rb20-stock-ecu/
Share on other sites

purple one is the standard cefiro AFM, and due to me soon using a r32 cpu, ignition module etc (which are different) i'd prefer to use the green label one over the purple one. If that makes sense. And don't ask why i'm changing ecu's, its a long story.

no point going z32 afm. it's more expensive than rb20det afm.. I didn't know cefiro's had different ones. anyway, stock afm from an r32 gtst or an r33 gtst should be around $100 from wreckers (green label)

z32 are same size as rb20det but have more resolution. If you actually *need* the extra resolution, ie u have enough power that u are running out of res. you would probably already have an aftermarket ecu and aftermarket injectors anyway...

I have an rb20det afm if you need one to test it. It works fine, just occasionally (like maybe every 10 times I drive the car) the idle plays up a bit. U can have it for $30 if you just need something to test with. PM me if interested in in bentleigh, vic.

Edited by MerlinTheHapyPig

$100? HAH I just got quoted $330 for a stock afm from TNH pfft

Maybe thats just caus I'm a chick and they think I don't know better? I don't know but I hope noone would be stupid enough to pay $330.

Merlin you don't happen to have a working one do you?

no, this one works fine, just this intermittant problem every now and then. But for testing purposes it's fine. Though, I replace it because it was causing that problem.

Kaz, i'd recommend going to a different wreckers from now on <_<

If you find yourself in SE suburbs, try

Oakleigh Mechanical Repairs

176 Kangaroo Rd, Oakleigh

ph 9568 4877

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yep, I like that. The tags are only on the first post of a thread and we don't get huge numbers of new threads. Also, I plan to add some more report types and we could have a member report type like 'review tags' then members could flag if they thought a topic wasn't tagged correctly.  No way man, I dig the input. Thanks! 
    • It's a valid thought. There's not exactly that functionality already (when creating a thread) - that's where the OP can use/create any tag they want. We'd have to come up with a way for the user to request their tags get reviewed or something. Otherwise the mods would have to review every new post's tags (for those that have them, anyway). There's kind of that functionality already exists to some extent, post facto of starting the thread, where the OP or any other user could report the post to admins, and request that tags get reviewed. We could do this already, and any user could already have made such a request. To make it a part of the forum proper, it would require an initial and an ongoing education programme, so that people know that it's a thing. OP based tagging/request for review would also require at least some (probably most) of the user base to be told that it's a thing they can do. Both of these things probably wouldn't spread too far and/or get used very much. If it was the standard approach on a lot of different sites, then it might do, because people would be used to it. Prank's approach to this differs from my original thought, by leaning into tagging. Which is fine - it's possibly better than what I originally suggested. In fact, I just went to the R32 GTR wiring diagram thread and added tags, including "Library". That's probably a good way to use tags and the idea of a library. We just have to drag together an (organised!) index of threads or posts that have that tag. I have yet to do any of my own follow up by pursuing worthy threads and posts and reporting/marking/tagging them for the library, such as the @Sydneykid stuff I was talking about, and possibly any amount of @Lithium 's and others' posts. At least if I tag them Library, we'll have a start.   Back to @Wazmond's idea as it relates to @PranK's, we might have some sort of a list of tags that are already used to scrape for this library. I'm not entirely sure how that would be presented or used, particularly if it got long. But it's yet another idea!   cheers
    • Just a thought, but instead of restricting, is it possible to do like an "up for review" kind of thing? Where say someone who's not an admin/mod tags, it would require approval for it to actually tag? User posts with a 'tag' > Admin/Mod Reviews > Approves tag > Tag now exists kinda thing? Just came across this thread so Im not too sure if Im straying off topic or not but forgive me if i am...
    • Yes, a plan for non-action is always my first sort of plan! I'm happy to see what falls out of invision's update. I had been having some thoughts on what to do with this the other day and they all seem to have fled my memory, after various solar panel induced traumas, squeaking suspension sphericals, etc etc, over the last little bit. I'll try and recall what I had in mind and make sure that I put it into print in some form before the Alzheimer's strikes again.
    • The ability to have both a 5500 stall for launching, and a regular lockup for every other scenario is pretty sweet. Does it actually work well like that though in the real world? Would it hold up to track use and otherwise you'd never know you had a stall converter in it? If so, that's awesome
×
×
  • Create New...