Jump to content
SAU Community

Rb26 Turbo Upgrade, All Dyno Results


SLY33

Recommended Posts

Twin GTX2860R 0.72 rear housings

Precision 46mm ext gates

Custom stainless steam pipe equal length high mount manifolds

Tomei oversize oil pump

ID 1000's

Twin Walbro 255's

2.5″ stainless dumps, 3" dump back

CNC Steel adjustable cam gears

Twin 6″ K&N pods

PWR Aero2 cooler with 3″ outlets

PWR twin pass X-flow 55mm radiator

PWR 21 row oil cooler

SPAL 16″ skew blade 2000CFM thermo fan

3 Quart Accusump

Custom RWD R33 GTR sump

CNC Steel adjustable cam gears

Stock cams

Stock bottom end

Stock head

373.2kw @17psi on E85

Compression test prior to the dyno came up with 185-190 across all 6, not sure why it was so high. Tried wounding out some power but caused misfires, so wouldn't make any less.

New cams, ECU and valves coming in the next few months, no idea what it will make when retune happens.

hmUNRuel.jpg

LPcbZKSl.jpg

Nice, in 4th gear what rpm would see 17psi?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi all just got my R33 GT-R le mans tuned.

Unopened r33 rb26 done just under 100,000 (whether it is legit or not lol)

Mods:

r34 n1 turbos

Ported stock manifolds

Split dump pipes

Xforce front pipes

100cel cat 3"

3.5" cat back

Apexi pods

Trust fmic

Hks evc-5

Link g4+ ecu (no afm's)

Siemens 660cc injectors

Nismo fuel reg

Walbro 255

OS Giken twin plat clutch

Probably more i missed.

Made 300hp on 14psi

365hp on 20psi

Was hoping for abit more after seeing some of the results here, but tuner said to do cams/gears/springs and should get near the 400hp mark.

Added a set of tomei adjustablecam gears. Car now makes 385hp atw 18psi on 98 :) dropped 2psi and gained an extra 20hp...

Impressive gain, wish i did it sooner!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First tune, ran out of dyno time. Boost on graph is PSI * 10 (for scaling purposes) and is straight from the log. It literally rained while we dyno'd so 100% humidity and 83 deg F ambient.

This is STOCK Haltech timing advance (untouched). Only would knock at 20 psi at 4400 rpms during spike. I'm DEFINITELY losing boost response on this because the logs with the wastegate hose pulled are showing 21 psi at 4100 rpms (as opposed to my lazy 4400 that was kinda of spiking at first). This was on the MEDIUM EFR wastegate cannister - now I have the high on and boost onsets even faster.

Pumpgas 93 (with the 10% ethanol they have in my area).

2.75L BC stroker

New N1 block 86mm bores

tomei poncam A

6boost manifold - divided for IWG EFR

8374 EFR .92 IWG divided

ported head

SS +.5mm valves

squish pads removed

Hypertune V2 90mm single TB

stock intercooler

800cc injectors (at the time, now 850cc)

DW 300 pump (at the time...running out of pump on dyno...now as sump and AEM380)

Haltech PnP Platinum Pro

Fluidampr harmonic balancer

Nismo Super coppermix twin clutch

Cam gears are '0' '0' (didn't have time to change them yet)

Boost 18 dropping to 16-17 on top.

Basically this is my "baseline" dyno, but I wanted to share since it's data. Car is very quick on the street and super responsive. I LOVE the turbo! I think with the added timing that I have done street tuning since this the car HAS to be making 500 or more whp.

post-136202-0-48192600-1466692825_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hks 2.8 stroker

N1 block

Ported head

tomei procams

Hypertune plenum - 90mm throttle

Hks100mm cooler

Precision 7175 1.12

4" dump/mid pipe/cat back

Vipec v88

625kw @ 32psi tuned by DVS JEZ

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
On 6/26/2016 at 9:56 AM, SiR_RB said:

Hks 2.8 stroker

N1 block

Ported head

tomei procams

Hypertune plenum - 90mm throttle

Hks100mm cooler

Precision 7175 1.12

4" dump/mid pipe/cat back

Vipec v88

625kw @ 32psi tuned by DVS JEZ

Must have a nice exhaust

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BC 2.9 stroker

Tomei head

Tomei 270 cams

Plazmaman 100mm cooler

Haltech Platinum

4inch dump/3 1/2 system(soon to be all 4inch)

Precision 76/85

749Kws @ 41psi tuned and built by JEM

1000.jpg

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 29/07/2016 at 9:51 PM, GTR_JOEY said:

It's 4 inch where it matters,

right behind the turbo

I don't mean to be seen to be picking on your posts but that is incorrect, it could be 4" all the way and have a 3.5" tip and that is enough to cause a restriction. Does not matter where it is along the pipe really.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, bigmikespec said:

I don't mean to be seen to be picking on your posts but that is incorrect, it could be 4" all the way and have a 3.5" tip and that is enough to cause a restriction. Does not matter where it is along the pipe really.

I disagree... cooler exhaust temps = more dense.. right out the turbo temps would be say 700~900 degrees, at the axle back I'm sure those temps are no where near it.. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

I disagree... cooler exhaust temps = more dense.. right out the turbo temps would be say 700~900 degrees, at the axle back I'm sure those temps are no where near it.. 

Yes because of heat transfer through the pipe which is nothing to do with what I said.

You have a 3.5" restriction, put it anywhere along the 4" pipe, it will do the same thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

nope. for a given pressure and mass flow, Air velocity through a given cross sectional area at 800 degrees C is approx. double that of air at 290 degrees and triple that of air at 100 degrees with pressure held constant.

 

no idea what the gas temperature at the rear muffler is though.

Edited by burn4005
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 20 March 2016 at 7:40 PM, nakameguro said:

I did a dyno run yesterday to get a base power figure before upgrading the turbos and getting a good tune.

93 BNR32
Mods:
HKS EVC
APEXi PFC
HKS Exhaust
SARD Metal Cat
R34 Turbos ceramic
Spitfire Direct Ignition System
HPI R35 AFM
TRUST/GReddy Intercooler
Tomei Type-R Poncams + Cam Gears
Nismo 555cc Injectors
Nismo Fuel Pump and FPR
ARC airbox
Nismo coppermix twin plate clutch.
 
 
Currently the car is running rich.
 
Dyno run boost at 1.1 bar, 238.3kw @all 4 wheels, with 351ft/lb torque.
which is calculated at 298.7kw at the crank (400hp) , and 48.6kgm
power curve wheel and crank:
sSxk8cB.jpg
 
Torque curve:
TsxIRuj.jpg
PAwWGhp.jpg
 
406ps at the crank
HB1plQP.jpg
ayQ6akx.jpg

Had the car retuned with GT-SS turbos, I'm still working out some issues before i'll be upping the boost too much.

 

current dyno sheet at 1.2bar of boost 260wkw but the low and midrange feels so much smoother/better now.

frRzzli.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1994 R32 GTR relatively stock

95k (ish) kms

Full 100k service with all the usual suspects changed and replenished.

Spitfire coil packs

Adjustable cam gears

Haltech Platinum- Pro V2 with wide-band controller

5bar Map sensor & Haltech boost solenoid

Cat back exhaust

221kw @15psi

CRD tuned

 

 

20160808_Troy Van Trienen Nissan Skyline GTR R32 kW Vs bOOst.jpg

20160808_Troy Van Trienen Nissan Skyline GTR R32 kW Vs N.jpg

20160805_Troy Van Trienen Nissan Skyline GTR R32 01.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Added plazaman 76mm cooler, pods, and a bit more boost.

Pods made the bigger difference (14 of the total 20kw gained) and were added on the dyno AFTER everything else had been done so we had proof the gain was purely pods at that point.

This was done in 4th, in 5th it made more power but less torque, I went with 4th as thats what we used last time when it made 334kw.

Car is driving nice and sounding good.

5a2b15cf641f4d50af4e2b2b32d10b40.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/13/2016 at 0:02 PM, ActionDan said:

Given 5th is 1 : 1 ratio in an R34 6spd is that what people are using for power runs?

We're doing some testing right now and my curve only looks like others in terms of response if we use 4th.

 

should dyno in 5th... 4th is cheating

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Nah, yeah, nah. Speakers have a nominal impedance of 8 ohm that looks more like 6.4 ohm when measured. The receiver's amplifiers (all channels) are all rated to 6 ohm (I think, it's been a long time since I cared). The real problem is that many modern class D amps have aggressive protection circuitry that cuts off the fun if they think too much current is being drawn. And with my speakers having series crossovers, as opposed to more typical parallel crossovers, and big TL enclosures, they can certainly dip down to lower impedances at some frequencies and that easily triggers the protection. Pioneer receivers are somewhat famous for it, but even Denon, Onkyo, et al, all have many complaints against them across various models. It only does it when listening to music at high levels. You have to be putting your ears at risk to do it. But sometimes I want to do that. If I was serious about using it as a listening room I'd simply upgrade the amp for the front pair to a nice Rotel or something, and just use the receiver for signal handling and processing - although that would be a bit of a pain in the arse too. Have to switch on more shit, pre-amp volume vs main amp volume, etc etc.
    • yeah pretty much, stopped playing after lightfall, couldnt be bothered with the final shape...  ran that game into the ground for years... bit of a shame.. the  story was awesome. was playing a lot of trials but the hackers became tooo much, ruined the game.  
    • This is why you don't get invited to press events.         Kodi
    • For example, you’ll need this approval if: you’re a car enthusiast looking to import a specialist vehicle or an older car you want to bring your vehicle with you when you move to Australia you manufacture or import special purpose vehicles or a small number of trailers each year.       Tutuapp 9Apps
    • I reckon you are 100% right on the money. The only reason I bought Red Sport instead of the base VR30 is that I am investigating racing it in Production Cars, and they require you to run a (mostly) standard car....therefore knowing exactly what was in the RS spec was important to me and I paid the extra. Other than that, for sure I would have pocketed the $10k and spent them on mods instead. Plus the non-RS models are more likely to have had a nicer life prior. Just a warning though, mods always cost twice as much as they look like they will on paper BTW you should also consider the 400R imports, they are about the same price as a local RS but 5+ years newer. Of course that comes with the usual warnings about finding parts, unhelpful nissan dealers and finding insurance
×
×
  • Create New...