Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Lasted 2 weeks so not bad... nah to be honest the car seem to be fine just finished it n got running after 1yr off the road plus jus paid full yr rego but shit happenes!! Now need to rebuild it hopefully it won't cost much lol

  • 2 weeks later...
On 29.03.2017 at 4:00 PM, Nosure said:

R34 gtr nur

Rb28

Poncam 260

valve spring

gtx3582 0.82 ts t3

4inch front pipe 3.5inch catback

1650cc injectors

650awhp @ 28psi 

500hp on 5000 rpm

IMG_2128.JPG

Daamn huge lag make that GTX35 with small turbine on 2.8 :O

12 hours ago, Nosure said:

The 2.8 doesn't make it spool quicker a lot. But on road it feel not that laggy.  Maybe adjust the cam gear will help the spool.  

Dial in more intake advance and pull timing out before 5k to get the turbo on faster.

5 hours ago, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

Dial in more intake advance and pull timing out before 5k to get the turbo on faster.

Yes. Will adjust both cam gear next month. At moment both cam gears are untouched.  The strange thing is my reimax cam gear does not have any degree mark on it:(  it might make the tuning a little bit difficult. 

IMG_2308.PNG

  • 2 weeks later...

N1 Block

Tomei RB28 stroker

Tomei Poncams Type B

Tomei Gaskets - 1.2mm 8.8:1

1000cc EV14

GT2860-5

LinkG4

Splitfire coils, grade 8 plugs

Mines Super outlet Pro II elbows

Mines Frontpipe Pro

HKS Type-R Intercooler

HKS Super Turbo Exhaust

HKS Cat.

HKS Hardpipes

etc...

 

First mapping done at 1.2 Bar (1.3 Peak) running on 98 Octane - starting getting some backpressure above this but will hopefully get it to 1.5Bar with 98 octane and E85 Flex after that. 

1.jpg

  • 3 weeks later...
  • N1 Block
  • Tomei RB28 stroker
  • JUN 272 9.7mm lift cams
  • Garrett GTX2863 turbos
  • HKS Fuel rail
  • Injector Dynamics ID2000 injectors
  • Link G4+ PNP Board\
  • Haltech Flexfuel sensor
  • full racepace 3.5" exhaust (tuned length headers)
  • Other items...

First tune done to engines capabilities, second tune completed to my preference, in the interest of keeping the engine in one piece. 

Full power: 505.4kW (atw) at 27psi

Final Tune: 410kW (atw) at 22psi

IMG_4364.JPG

IMG_4365.JPG

  • Like 1

Curious to know why you would think an engine like that wouldn't live with 500rwkw on a daily basis? the power is all in the right foot and the boost controller

We have been making 450rwkw+ on a stock block and crank for years no issues. Your combo should be good for considerably more on a regular basis

Edited by ido09s
2 minutes ago, ido09s said:

Curious to know why you would think an engine like that wouldn't live with 500rwkw on a daily basis? the power is all in the right foot and the boost controller

We have been making 450+ on a stock block and crank for years no issues. You combo should be good for considerably more on a regular basis

It's not that I don't think it will, i just don't require that much power. I haven't really had a chance to open the car up to it's' maximum potential so it just seemed like a no brainer to turn it down for now. If i decide later on that it needs more go, i can always have it turned back up. 

For me, it's fast enough for the moment, so my theory here is that less power should mean less stress on components. My right foot is little bit scared of the power.

The other thing worth noting is the diff gearing has been shortened (4.375 ratios), so the car really moves. I can drive it around in 5th no problem and still have enough torque to pull from 50kph. In summary; it seemed fast enough.

1 minute ago, Steve85 said:

It's not that I don't think it will, i just don't require that much power. I haven't really had a chance to open the car up to it's' maximum potential so it just seemed like a no brainer to turn it down for now. If i decide later on that it needs more go, i can always have it turned back up. 

For me, it's fast enough for the moment, so my theory here is that less power should mean less stress on components. My right foot is little bit scared of the power.

The other thing worth noting is the diff gearing has been shortened (4.375 ratios), so the car really moves. I can drive it around in 5th no problem and still have enough torque to pull from 50kph. In summary; it seemed fast enough.

That's fair enough. I guess all you need to do is ask the tuner to turn the boost back up ;) we run an old Link G4, no +, and our boost is controlled through the ECU. Turn the air con on in our car and it doesn't loose power, it gives it another 15psi of boost :P 

You should try some 4.9's ;) We use them for drag racing but on the street they are insane. You runs out of puff pretty quickly though. Its an RB26 S14 hence the reason we can run such a ratio.

12 minutes ago, ido09s said:

You should try some 4.9's

Wait 4.9s? That's going the wrong way for my preference. :1_grinning: That must be insane... Mine tops out at about 240-260 at the moment (i can't be sure), it was doing it pretty easy at a track day (til it broke, thanks igniter!)

I do have a switch for high boost, but low boost seems mental enough for the moment.

2 minutes ago, Steve85 said:

Wait 4.9s? That's going the wrong way for my preference. :1_grinning: That must be insane... Mine tops out at about 240-260 at the moment (i can't be sure), it was doing it pretty easy at a track day (til it broke, thanks igniter!)

I do have a switch for high boost, but low boost seems mental enough for the moment.

Yeah you read right, 4.9s ;) We use the 4.1's normally but swap it over when we race it. If it would get off the line it would run some decent times but it does trap 138mph all day every day :P

 

Live life a little, run high boost :D 500rwkw is fun!!!!!

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I've done a few BMS systems. Code in Canada use to force us to have any safety components outside of the PLC but with a code change back in 2018 I believe it was, we can now use safety PLC's to control everything. Sadly to your point, AB Guardlogix safety instructions for example are only available in ladder.  Machine safety is a very big thing here though, you're constantly forced to migrate to the next best thing by OSHA. I honestly prefer safety plc's, including anything from AB more then I do working with old school safety monitoring relays. PLC is only one portion of it, the rest of the electrical still has to follow to meet SIL (Mechanically linked dual contacts, bla bla)  Now tell me how to feel about safety over comm's (e.g Ethernet/IP CIP) on a unmaintained network haha
    • To your point, boolean logic. We're not only working with bools in ecu's, so it's very limiting. I wanted to setup a low WMI pressure alarm. After 1 second I want WMI line to hit 100PSI, 2 seconds 175PSI, etc. and trigger an alarm if it doesn't meet those thresholds. This would of taken me one very short line of text, but instead I had to bugger around with generic timers, conditions, etc. and so forth.
    • I much prefer that to an actual oil pressure issue, never would of thought it would of been a volt drop issue but SAU brains win again. Guess ill be turning down the oil pressure limit for the track and hunting some grounds. Ill hopefully update this thread with some high oil pressure and solid ecu voltage logs. 
    • You've just discovered a really good reason to tell yourself, yes, I do need to buy an aftermarket ECU. Put the MAF in the bin. Slap in the new ECU and have a think about what turbo sounds you prefer.  Do you want a 90's style BOV wooosh? Do you want a hektik tsututututu?  Mate, can't go wrong. Just gotta get that ECU and the world is your oyster. 
    • Hi. Iam just curisou about this topic. I saw this video. It is about Greddy Type FV2. I know that BoVs are about that sound but how and when to use it? I read some topic here and from what i have understand on stock RB with MAF there will be some "problems" if you use this BoV? It vents the air in to the atmosphere and the MAF on stock car needs this air back in to the intake and not out? Or is it wrong? If so...i saw you can put some adaptor to circule air back...but does that not "loose" that sound? I saw another BoV from Turbosmart and it has two "exhaust" like ports? One is for the stock tubing for letting air back and one is for "sound" and let the air in the atmosphere? Can someone please explain? This is the Greddy one:  And this is the Turbosmart.     THANK YOU!! EDIT: So i read about this topic some more and i if i understand that correctly: That Greddy can function either like BoV or 100% Bypass valve? And that Turbosmart is what they called hybrid so you can adjust what and how many air can be vented out or back in? Is this right? THX!
×
×
  • Create New...