Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 41
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Id say its a good thing to do while the heads off.

Remember boost is a measurement of restriction of airflow. Anything that helps the motor breathe better is good imho.

You will get better power out of it for the same boost that you had before....

On a side note, the guys who did mine and Cubes did it for roughly $200 ish...anymore spent wasnt worth the $ to power gain....

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/94018-port-and-polish/#findComment-1698640
Share on other sites

As you guys were saying, porting isn't really necessary or needed at mild modding.

But, wouldn't polishing the combustion chamber be a nice measure to help control Knock if and when he plans on upping the boost?

I bet that would be rather inexpensive to just polish without porting.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/94018-port-and-polish/#findComment-1699787
Share on other sites

I agree with RB240av and clayoth

better flow = more power, more efficiently (free kilowatts so to speak)

the amount of power an engine can develop is dependent on the mass of air it can breathe per unit of time – a simple mathematical fact of life for an engine builder.

I have seen (or read about) up to 30% gains when porting the RB25 head, and I'd think it would be worth while no matter what the boost level (IMHO)

Modern heads may be good - but they are still mass manufactured and include castings and dags.

At a minimum you should look at port matching, a polish up of the combustion chambers (for a cleaner burn) and a polish up of the inlet and exhaust valve bowls. Keep in mind you may also need to replace valve seats and seam seals at the same time (if you are not doing so already)

get it tidied up - you know you should ;)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/94018-port-and-polish/#findComment-1703742
Share on other sites

yeah I don't see the point at mr crusts level of modification... unless bigger turbo and fuel system are waiting in the wings... even then I would be looking at cams instead... however it all changes if the head is stuffed and needs a recondition or you plan on running sky high revlimits

in a GTR its a different story

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/94018-port-and-polish/#findComment-1703835
Share on other sites

Its not really free kilowatts at all. Same could be said by adding 1-2psi in, doesnt "cost" you anything.

With a better flowing head, itll make same power @ less boost, potentially...

But if you want to make more power you need to screw more in anyway.

On a stock turbo your limited to the boost you can run, so there is no benefit either way that can be justified. Even a mild 2530 upgrade or something to 220-240rwkw

I mean i ran a 100% stock head, flowed fine for the 270rwkw on 17psi outta the gt30, 330rwkw on some 104/24psi

I was on a budget then, and i couldnt justify the cost at all.

I didnt do cams for that reason either.

It was $1000+ that could be better much spent on a PowerFC/AFM/Fuel system IMO, and it was ;)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/94018-port-and-polish/#findComment-1703864
Share on other sites

It was $1000+ that could be better much spent on a PowerFC/AFM/Fuel system  IMO, and it was ;)

totally... I spent a grand on cams and there is no contest between the effect of that mod vs when the cooler went in... the cooler won hands down! but I kinda knew that would be the case;)

so yeah, save your money

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/94018-port-and-polish/#findComment-1703900
Share on other sites

My head has been ported and has a set of Tomei cams. Was advised NOT to polish the head, something to do with the fuel spray, this came from the porter.

Unlike those that have not experienced the benefits of porting and cams, but still like to talk it down, i can not speak highly enough of the benefits i have felt and gained.

BUT: As stated b4, this should be done after a turbo upgrade. Wether you decide on just a "hi-flow rb25/vg30 turbo" or go crazy with a "T78", gains can be had with porting and cams.

My "hi-flow rb25/vg30 turbo", with porting and cams is making 270rwkw@15psi, compared to Ash's GT30 making 270rwkw@17psi. I have also the added bonus of looking standard, as the turbo has the factory comp cover/housing and factory shields.

Once again: these should be one of your last power mods, but i beleive that they shouldn't be overlooked.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/94018-port-and-polish/#findComment-1704230
Share on other sites

Unlike those that have not experienced the benefits of porting and cams, but still like to talk it down, i can not speak highly enough of the benefits i have felt and gained.

My "hi-flow rb25/vg30 turbo", with porting and cams is making 270rwkw@15psi, compared to Ash's GT30 making 270rwkw@17psi. I have also the added bonus of looking standard, as the turbo has the factory comp cover/housing and factory shields.

But you did all the mods at once, but hard to judge how good one thing is when you do a complete package of mods.

We made the same power (although would loved to have tested that same dyno to compare much more accurately) but i saved what... $1500? :D

More beer money for meeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee :lol:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/94018-port-and-polish/#findComment-1704562
Share on other sites

But you did all the mods at once, but hard to judge how good one thing is when you do a complete package of mods.

We made the same power (although would loved to have tested that same dyno to compare much more accurately) but i saved what... $1500?  :)

More beer money for meeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee :lol:

I too would have liked to see a same dyno, same day, comparison, As i believe that dyno charts aren't really worth much. Mind you my car is only fully tunned to run 255rwkw, as i never intended to run over this power, with a std bottom end. :D

Note: Little off track :blink:

Did you save that $1500?

What about the new ic piping, oil and water lines, most people require a new exhaust manifold (You were lucky and has the GTS-R manifold), maybe an ext. wastegate, etc. When you add all these up, just to acheive a similar figure, how much are you really saving, you'll probably find you are actually spending more :)

Lets not forget all the hidden costs:

- More boost=less reliablity

- EPA: You mods stuck out and were obvious, the officer will really have to know his stuff to pick up on my mods. B)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/94018-port-and-polish/#findComment-1705588
Share on other sites

now now - lets settle it down girls

let's agree that port and polishing is a good thing - but only when it's justified, and I mean in terms of cost and desired performance

Let's also agree that to REALLY see the benefits - you need the other supporting mods, EG exhaust, dumps, AFMs CAMS and the list goes on

My opinion is that once these other mods ARE done - that you will see better results if the proper prep work has also been done

I also ggree - $1500 is a lot of beer (or scotch in my case :))

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/94018-port-and-polish/#findComment-1705636
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The values for HID colour are also defined ~ see https://www.legislation.gov.au/F2006L02732/latest/text  ~ goto section 3.9 onwards ....
    • So, if the headlights' cutoff behaviour (angles, heights, etc) are not as per 6.2.6.1.1 without automatic levelling, then you have to have to have automatic** levelling. Also, if the headlight does not have the required markings, then neither automatic nor manual adjusters are going to be acceptable. That's because the base headlight itself does not meet the minimum requirement (which is the marking). ** with the option of manual levelling, if the headlight otherwise meets the same requirements as for the automatic case AND can be set to the "base" alignment at the headlight itself. So that's an additional requirement for the manual case. So, provided that the marking is on the headlight and there is a local manual adjustment back to "base" on the headlight, then yes, you could argue that they are code compliant. But if you are missing any single one of these things, then they are not. And unlike certain other standards that I work with, there does not seem to be scope to prepare a "fitness for purpose" report. Well, I guess there actually is. You might engage an automotive engineer to write a report stating that the lights meet the performance requirements of the standard even if they are missing, for example, the markings.  
    • Vertical orientation   6.2.6.1.1. The initial downward inclination of the cut off of the dipped-beam to be set in the unladen vehicle state with one person in the driver's seat shall be specified within an accuracy of 0.1 per cent by the manufacturer and indicated in a clearly legible and indelible manner on each vehicle close to either headlamp or the manufacturer's plate by the symbol shown in Annex 7.   The value of this indicated downward inclination shall be defined in accordance with paragraph 6.2.6.1.2.   6.2.6.1.2. Depending on the mounting height in metres (h) of the lower edge of the apparent surface in the direction of the reference axis of the dipped beam headlamp, measured on the unladen vehicles, the vertical inclination of the cut off of the dipped- beam shall, under all the static conditions of Annex 5, remain between the following limits and the initial aiming shall have the following values:   h < 0.8   Limits: between 0.5 per cent and 2.5 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.0 per cent and 1.5 per cent   0.8 < h < 1.0   Limits: between 0.5 per cent and 2.5 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.0 per cent and 1.5 per cent   Or, at the discretion of the manufacturer,   Limits: between 1.0 per cent and 3.0 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.5 per cent and 2.0 per cent   The application for the vehicle type approval shall, in this case, contain information as to which of the two alternatives is to be used.   h > 1.0   Limits: between 1.0 per cent and 3.0 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.5 per cent and 2.0 per cent   The above limits and the initial aiming values are summarized in the diagram below.   For category N3G (off-road) vehicles where the headlamps exceed a height of 1,200 mm, the limits for the vertical inclination of the cut-off shall be between: -1.5 per cent and -3.5 per cent.   The initial aim shall be set between: -2 per cent and -2.5 per cent.
×
×
  • Create New...