Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

I noticed that in my 34, I have to step on the brake pedal a fair bit more to get it to stop. The feel of the brakes are poorer at very low speeds e.g. 5-10km/hr.

Stopping from normal speeds is okay, but when you slow down to 5-10km/hr, you have to give the brakes a little push further to bring it to a complete stop.

I am used to driving new cars where you can just step on the pedal at a constant rate and it will come to a stop.

I don't know whether this is just how the brakes are or whether something is wrong with mine.

Can anybody offer any insight?

Thanks

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/94329-brakes-in-a-34-or-any-skyline/
Share on other sites

Car was only complianced last month, and unfortunately I do not have a service history for it. Pads look good ie. plenty of meat on them, I might just have to do a brake fluid flush coz it probably has never been done.

How much fluid is needed when bleeding brakes on a 34? Id say it would be the same as a 33 right>?

Edited by nuffsaid

You can do it with a 1 litre bottle but sometimes it takes just a fraction more which is annoying. It should have new pads and fluid from the compliancing so perhaps there is an air bubble in there.

Either way, bleed your brakes and get back to us.

Just checked with compliance people who did my car, brake fluids were replaced last month and pads would have been replaced with Nissan pads if less than 50% were used up.

My pedal feels quite hard when braking, it feels as if the pads arent gripping the rotors properly. Will check them out this weekend.

It may be your pads....if you have pads which are more track oriented than road oriented, they might need to warm up a bit before they start working well.

..but having said that, I reckon the brake pedal in Skyline feels totally different to the brake in any other car.

Mechanics have said that the ABS is working fine and the brakes are fine. Checked the vacuum lines and everything is good.

I think the pads may be a slightly hard compound making the feel not that great. They also said I am probably not used to driving a big heavy car also.

Mechanics have said that the ABS is working fine and the brakes are fine. Checked the vacuum lines and everything is good.

I think the pads may be a slightly hard compound making the feel not that great. They also said I am probably not used to driving a big heavy car also.

First of all, and believe it or not, the R34 Skyline is not a big heavy car when compared to local products. From memory, the the Skyline is nearly 300 Kg lighter than the BA Falcon. It may be heavy when compared to some fibreglassed monster but at 1350 kg does not rate in the heavy catergory.

I use EBC Greenstuf pads and these suckers will just about put you thru the windscreen. Their temp range is 50C to 650C, have next to no squeal when cold and only need one application to come up to temp from cold. Do not suffer from fade on street and spirited driving use, next to none in brake dust and are relatively gentle on the rotors.

Definitely sounds like you may have a bubble.

Cheers and good luck

Muz

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You're not wrong, but more than a few times I've heard of people running into issues where their injector characterization isn't quite right and that approach works for that specific configuration but once they switch over to a new set they discover a whole bunch of stuff wasn't set up correctly. It's slightly more annoying to reverse engineer the OEM MAF transfer function but you already have the sensor wired up to the factory harness so keeping it around for a few weeks more while you figure out the tune is easy enough. I've seen GM also use a combination of both MAF + MAP in their ECUs before, MAF is for steady state and a calculation of the cylinder VE to correct the base VE table, then in transients it uses that calculated VE + raw MAP to determine cylinder filling somehow.
    • I know this one’s the BB one. My tuner did make mention about the actuator. I am curious about the VCT as well
    • Might also needs a stronger actuator with the right preloading. With older 2019 built bush G3 units, BB upgrade or 21U housing down size makes a pretty decent gain in response as well. 
    • Hey lads  so im finally putting together my rb30 forged bottom end and ran into an issue. I measured my main bearing clearance with arp main studs torqued to 60 ft-lbs using ACL H series STD size bearings and standard, un-ground crank shaft journals and got an oil clearance reading of about 1.3 thou measuring straight up and down and about 2.8 thou measuring at a 45 degree angle (just above and below the parting line). My machine shop said they measured the main tunnel and it was all within spec (they didnt say the actual measurement) and to go with a standard size bearing, which i have done and the clearance is too tight, I'm guessing because of the extra clamping force from the arp studs distorting the main tunnel. I was wanting to run about 2.5 thou main bearing clearance.  My questions are: 1. could i just use the HX extra 1 thou clearance ACL bearings? that would fix my straight up and down clearance making it about 2.3 thou, but then would the side to side clearance be too big at around 3.8 thou? 2. what actually is the recommended main bearing clearance for measuring near the parting line / side to side. i know its supposed to be bigger as the bearing has some eccentricity built into it but how much more clearance should there be compared to the straight up and down measurement? at the moment there is about 1.5thou difference, is that acceptable or should it be less? 3. If i took the engine block + girdle back to the machine shop and got them to line bore the main tunnel (like i told them to do the first time, but they said it didnt need it) what bearing size would i buy? the STD size bearing shells already slide in fairly easily with no real resistance, some even falling out if i tip the girdle up-side-down. If im taking material out of the main tunnel would i need a bearing with extra material on the back side to make up for it? this is probably confusing af to read so if something doesn't make sense let me know and ill try explaining in a different way. My machine shop doesn't come back from christmas break until mid January, hence why i'm asking these questions here. TIA for any help or info 
    • I bought the model back in Japan in Feb. I realised I could never build it, looked around for people who could build it, turns out there's some very skilled people out there that will make copies of 1:1 cars or near enough. I'm not really a photo guy... but people were dragging me in a group chat for the choice of bumper as someone else saw the car before it was finished as they are also a customer of that shop. I took the photo in the above post because I was pretty confident that the lip would work wonders for it. Here's some more in-progress and almost-done pics. It gives a good enough idea as to what the rear looks like!   I have also booked in a track day at the end of January. Lets all hope that is nothing but pure fun and games. If it's not pure fun and games, well, I've already got half an engine spare in the cupboard 
×
×
  • Create New...