Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • 7 months later...
  • 1 month later...
BYBY,

I am taking 200+rwkw to be about 310HP at the flywheel. I dont think the stock turbo can move this much air at 1bar. At least why would you go a 2530 for a power increase when they are rated at about 310/20 HP?

they are rated to that but we all know that a HKS2530 will support 250rwkw @ 1.5bar..HKS underrate there turbo's a fair bit

how do they make 250rwkw (backed up by a 11 sec pass) on a RB20 @ 1.5bar then?

if they can do it on a RB20, it can be done with a Rb25

it was 247rwkw but hey, whos counting

the stock R33 turbo will flow 200rwkw @ 1bar

Moving into less known territory here but I think because the RB20 requires less air. I'm guessing it would have to have less torque too but it's probably in a lighter car with who knows what other mods for an 11 second pass.

People here have tried it on an RB25 and despite others telling them that they can get 250 they never can. There is all sorts of talk about boost controllers and waste gates actuators but in the end it doesn't seem to be able to push enough air into the RB25.

I'm sure a stock turbo can push 200 rwkw at 1 bar, in fact, probably at a little under one bar.

they are rated to that but we all know that a HKS2530 will support 250rwkw @ 1.5bar..HKS underrate there turbo's a fair bit

I think I have been trying in the to say that (in the distant past) 200rwkw at 1 bar translates to 300hp at the motor or less. My speculation was about actual engine power. dyno readings are to me like peices of toilet paper when used for inane comparisons between cars. The 1/4 mile time for the Rb20 powered thingo is more interesting. I'd be more swayed to buying a turbo based on what it 'does' in the real world when setup correctly. ;)

Hey guys.... Im bulding a sub 11 sec car myself and noticed a few of you going for the davis craig thermos.... if you are looking for cheaper alternative, go for a 2nd hand vn-vs v6 thermo... i hooked mine up to the sensor on the manifold. The clutch fan uses more energy than you wood believe... and worse it sounds terrible when cold :P

Hi sorry I dont know if this has been mentioned yet but can you guys provide a DIY style info guide to removing fluid clutch style engine fan and how to replace with a thermo fan.

I'd like to give this a go if you guys say it produces more power but I havent got a clue how,

PRESA,

It doens't make more power but, rather reduces inertia. Makes the car accelerate faster anyway so who cares?

It's best if you remove the radiator. Once you have done that everthing is just an unbolt and bolt on affair. I'm sure if you have some experience working on your cars then it's too easy. If not a step by step is not going to help if you can't work out whats in front of you.

There are 4 bolts holding the cluth fan on. undo them whilst the fan belt is still on (holds the pulley in place).

With the radiator out this will be very easy.

line up the thermo fan on the radiator so as to retain the fan shroud (you must keep this to gain the maximum cooling effect).

Wire up the the connections needed and the relay ready for the thermo fan.

bolt it back up and fill with coolant , remember to bleed the air out.

test.

  • 6 months later...
they are rated to that but we all know that a HKS2530 will support 250rwkw @ 1.5bar..HKS underrate there turbo's a fair bit

I think I have been trying in the to say that (in the distant past) 200rwkw at 1 bar translates to 300hp at the motor or less. My speculation was about actual engine power. dyno readings are to me like peices of toilet paper when used for inane comparisons between cars. The 1/4 mile time for the Rb20 powered thingo is more interesting. I'd be more swayed to buying a turbo based on what it 'does' in the real world when setup correctly. :D

my opinion

200rwkw would be more than 300 engine hp.

300hp = 225kw. You would loose more than 25kw throught the drive train.

eg

standard r33 gtst engine power 187 and and 135rwkw rough estimation.Thats 52 KW. Id say 200rwkw would be closer to 250kw+ at the engine which is arround 335hp.

cheers

  • 4 months later...

Sold it before I got to the track again to try. The last run it ever did was 13.3@106mph and a 2.3 60ft (205 tyres), so in a nut shell with wider rear tyres a high 12 would have been pretty easy, the 60ft just needed to be about 2.1.

There are now quite a few r33's with stock turbo's that can lay claim to the 12 second title. I'm not sure if any of them did it with the stock intercooler though?

I've got a GTR work car now that is more fun to drive, I had to sell the GTST to get the GTR simple logic. The GTR will bolt in a mid 11 pretty easy. :P

I also had fitted a nitrous kit just before selling it and would have liked to have made a few passes with that on as well. 2rismo ended up with my old nitrous kit parts and after he added a few thing to it he got a stock turbo'd GTST into the 11's with a shot of the gas. Thats a good effort in anyones books.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • From my youth: GTi-R clutch change is a massive pain. The gearboxes are fragile? But the car is super cool and I want one 馃槩 
    • Remember this is 1988 tech.
    • Driveline vibration is resolved. I ended up loosening all my engine mount and trans mount bolts, giving it a good shake then retightening everything and it's gone... Let's just say I was surprised that fixed it.  I've been happily driving it around again but unfortunately put zero time into my direct port/constant pressure WMI setup. I'm on vacation next week, so I'll try and finalize it then.  On a different note, I spent all week fuel/ignition mapping 2x 216L V16 engines. Turbo's were burning glycol and we swapped them out for larger units. We also had planned emissions testing on site, so I figured I'd be there the same week to use their instrumentation and massage any emissions issues out if needed. This was a first for me. Fuel management is similar in certain ways to automotive (i.e air density as load variable) but very different in others. It's all PLC based and AFR's are controlled by air and not fuel. They use a control valve between the turbo and air manifold to control pressure which in turn controls AFR's. Due to this, target AFR tables supplied by the OEM are in pressures and not mass which really through me off. They use air pressure vs fuel pressure tables. I also relied on an O2 concentration sensor the emissions team had in the exhaust. Ignition timing was also all over the place and we were losing a fair bit of power. They're now happily sitting at 16-40BTDC depending on load. We were making about 1600kw at 900rpm at 90% load. Engines were running a lot smoother as well.    
    • heh, aint no R32 ever meeting modern targa cage rules unless the driver is veeeery short OP, good luck with the sale, since its already in the land of freedom I'm sure you will find a good buyer.
    • meh, it was a good video, clear about the issue and how he dealt with it. A bit heavy on the RTV and very brave to put an RB in anything without rebuilding it first, but otherwise I thought it was good Dose, I'm not sure that having the pickup forward is a big issue; yes of course the oil could shift under brakes but the sump should never be empty enough for that to be a problem (unless you also have a higher volume oil pump, and that oil can't return from the head to the sump quickly enough)
  • Create New...