Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Just in the UK at the moment, and yesterday hired a turbo diesel peugeot. It was a new car with only 2000 miles on the clock and man I was impressed with the performance!

Not as good as my r33 of course BUT it only used 15 litres of diesel for 198 miles of spirited driving! I didn't believe the trip computer when it said 58.5 miles per gallon but at fuel up time it was comfirmed.

So I was just interested in if anyone has looked into importing cars from the UK or do it at the moment? Also I haven't ever looked at turbo diesel cars available in AUS - it's not a thing I've ever been interested in. Just that cars depreciate in price very quickly in England - 2-3 year old cars go for 80% less than when they were purchased new.

With the way that car handled/drived I'd have no worries having it as a daily driver - the modern turbo diesel comes onto boost at about 1600 rpm and you can be really lazy, chugging along in a higher gear than normal. Taking off from lights is effortless and you leave a lot of similar sizes petrol cars for dead.

Anyway - I'm interested in what other people have to say!

Cheers

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/94670-importing-from-england/
Share on other sites

Sounds like a great little car, I don't mind Pug's well built units.

As for the Uk import scene terminal rust (chassis) is usually the biggest concern. But with late model cars like the pug you mention it wouldn't be an issue i'd guess...still I'd be looking underneath anything I was considering very closely.

we've imported a few cars from England for clients... only really good for specialty cars though. Plus most of the newer cars can't be imported as they either don't meet SEVS requirements or are already sold locally. If the car is built before 1989 then it can be done, shipping is a little more expensive than from Japan, but other than that the process is virtually the same.

A lot of European manufacturers are releasing their diesel models in Australia these days, so there is probably no need to import. Even with the fast depreciation of the UK market, it probably wouldn't end up any cheaper due to the extra costs of importing. Plus compliance would likely be impossible.

As far as I know, it's only really BMW who refuse to sell diesel in Aust (except in the 4x4s), which is a real shame because I've heard good things about the diesel engines in the 1-series (122bhp, 0-100km/h in 10 secs, 6 litres/100km) and 5-series (272bhp, 560Nm, 0-100km/h in 6.5secs(!), 8 litres/100km). Peugeot, Citroen, Mercedes, Audi and a few others are introducing more and more of the diesel line up to Australian markets. If diesel is your thing, there are rumours of diesel variant for Holden Commodore (Isuzu sourced) and Ford Territory for the next generation of cars.

Just had a look online on the Australian trading post and could only find one diesel peugeot, and no VW golf diesels.

Also just had a look at the friday add here in England and there's quite a few peugeot turbo diesels going for under 3000 pounds, and one was a 2003 model! Also got a performance car magazine, and they did a performance buyer hot hatch test.

One of the hatches tested is the Peugeot 206 HDI GTI, which has a 1.6 litre turbo diesel, 110bhp,180lb/ft torque, 58 MPG - with a purchase price of 13770 pounds after 3 years it will be worth only 4900 pounds....

Just had a look online on the Australian trading post and could only find one diesel peugeot, and no VW golf diesels.

I did a search on CarSales.com.au for Peugeot with keyword "diesel" and got 3 private sales and 26 dealer sales. There were also 6 diesel Golfs in dealerships advertised. So they are definitely around!

But if you get a diesel, it's gotta be something like this :P:

"Headlining the offensive was the SLK's new performance-orientated triple turbo (yes, triple) 3.0-litre V6. The SLK320 CDI Vision, as it officially known, was equipped with the latest Piezo Injector technology and a trick water-to-air intercooler, which enabled the engine to produce 286hp and 630Nm of torque.

It's enough, according to Mercedes-Benz, to provide the compact roadster with 0-100kmh acceleration in 5.3 seconds, just 0.4sec slower than the V8-powered SLK55 AMG. Fuel consumption is said to average 7.5 litres per 100 kilometres on a mix of city and highway use. Translation: it's very frugal for its power."

http://www.drive.com.au/editorial/article.aspx?id=9427&vf=1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • to fix the voltage drop issue I swapped out the old 150amp alternator which turns out is a brand known for having issues and replaced it with the black 180amp alternator beside it 
    • For anyone interested, the Way Back Machine has that Japanese website archived with pictures, etc: https://web.archive.org/web/20051023225805fw_/http://www.a31cefiro.com/air_con.htm "Simply swapping the wiring of the harness will not allow it to function properly. For the outdoor air sensor and sunlight sensor, disconnect the wiring connected to CN1-11 of the air conditioning harness from the harness and connect the sensor side wiring to earth. For the indoor air sensor, disconnect the wiring connected to CN2-3 of the air conditioning harness from the harness and connect the sensor side wiring to earth. The connector PIN numbers listed here are the genuine A31 PIN numbers. To avoid incorrect wiring, check with a tester before wiring. Also, disconnect the wiring in a location close to the sensor. The disconnected harness side wiring will not be used, so be sure to insulate it." Wish someone sold a conversion harness to just plug-and-play a Kouki 180sx digital climate control into C33/A31. I'm decent with wiring but feeling kinda lazy about taking this on. Edit: Did some more digging and found a helpful Minkara blog post about the conversion as well: https://minkara.carview.co.jp/userid/1831116/car/1360568/2284209/note.aspx "After installation is complete or the battery is replaced, you need to go into self-diagnosis mode and set the internal air recirculation. The way to do it is to "hold OFF with the key on for more than 5 seconds, set the number to 5, then press 卍→C." ↑↑↑It probably won't make sense unless you actually try it (・∀・)." Lol wtf
    • Maybe SAUNSW could see howany members would do a motorkhana day if Schofield's is still available for a reasonable price...
    • Skip the concrete, we just need to smooth a field. Mark knows how to drive a grader Duncan   I reckon 100x100 flat area for skid pan style, and then some sort tracks for rally... Duncan's already got a rally car on the premises to...
    • Well, yeah, the RB26 is definitely that far off the mark. From a pure technology point of view it is closer to the engines of the 60s than it is to the engines of the last 10 years. There is absolutely nothing special about an RB26 that wasn't present in engines going all the way back to the 60s, except probably the four valve head. The bottom end is just bog standard Japanese stuff. The head is nothing special. Celicas in the 70s were the same thing, in 4cyl 2 valve form. The ITBs are nothing special when you consider that the same Celicas had twin Solexes on them, and so had throttle plates in the exact same place. There's no variable valve timing, no variable inlet manifold, which even other RBs had either before the 26 came out or shortly afterward. The ECU is pretty rude and crude. The only things it has going for it are that the physical structure was pretty bloody tough for a mass produced engine, the twin-turbos and ITBs made for a bit of uniqueness against the competition (and even Toyota were ahead on the twin turbs thing, weren't they?) and the electronic controls and measuring devices (ie, AFMs, CAS, etc) were good enough to make it run well. Oh, and it sounds better than almost anything else, ever. The VR38 is absolutely halfway between the RB generation and the current generation, so it definitely has a massive increase in the sophistication of the electronics, allowing for a lot more dynamic optimisation of mapping. Then there's things like metal treatments and other coatings on things, adoption of variable cam stuff, and a bunch of other little improvements that mean it has to be a better thing than the RB26. But I otherwise agree with you that it is approximately the same thing as a 26. But, skip forward another 10 years from that engine and then the things that I mentioned in previous post come out to play. High compression, massively sophisticated computers, direct injection, clever measuring sensors, etc etc. They are the real difference between trying to make big power with a 26 and trying to make big power with a S/B50/54 (or whatever the preferred BMW engine of the week is).
×
×
  • Create New...