Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I suppose however, that on a completely stock skyline, the stock intercooler would have an efficency close enough to a FMIC for the purpose of producing the power made at 'stock'. Furthermore any advantages made by lowering the charge density of the air from a FMIC would probably be outweighed by the difference in the 'lag' time taken for the turbocharger to increase the pressure in a larger area.

So in that respect Paul, I would agree with you. I wouldn't see how just adding a FMIC would increase power (unless you had other mods like exhaust, upped boost pressure etc).

I just picked up my blitz boost controller from autobarn today, f*ken whole manual is japanese, there goes the auotbarn sales talk 'it wll bolt on, just read the manual'. I ordered a Hybrid front mount intercooler kit through them yesterday as well, got if for $890 inc freight to Darwin, not too bad, could have got it cheaper but i get a local replacement warranty etc. MODS are coming slowly

When i installed my front mount, the biggest thing i noticed was the lack of throttle response. Running the same boost i thought that the car was a little slower overall.

Turning up the boost sorta overcame that problem, but throttle response wasnt there. When boost hit though, it felt faster (since i was running more boost), but from my experience with a FMIC, ive come to the conclusion that a fmic is a support part to allow you to get more power.

I still need tuning though so maybe my opinion will change after that.

So pretty much what paulr33 said is spot on.

What youll get is more lag, less throttle response and worse fuel economy, but you get the potential to make more power in the end.

my fmic is a greddy v-spl

Physics hey? Boyles Law, Charles’s Law etc.

P1V1/T1=P2V2/T2

I’ll borrow some numbers from FMIC tests for a RS500 and pick a boost of 15psi.

Turbo air temp was 135deg C. (408 deg absolute)

After the cooler the air temp is 35deg C. (308 deg absolute)

So the turbo pumps 15psi x V1 at 408 deg absolute.

After the cooler we have either 0.75V1 at 15psi or V1 at 11.3psi.

Sure there is air flow resistance in the pipework and heat soak for a sustained load, but the numbers demonstrate you get more denser air.

Most errors happen in wastegate pressure readings.

An Rb20 takes the wastegate pressure straight from the compressor housing so it doesn’t know what is happening in the plenum. It will spool up fractionally faster but now there is a lot more volume to fill so it’s a bit laggy.

Once the initial surge has levelled out, the plenum pressure will be lower than normal, but it will be filled with denser air so the net result is similar power, with a nice anti-detonation safety margin.

The Rb25 takes its wastegate pressure after the cooler, so you’ll get more air in the plenum due to the increase in air density. Again it will spool up slightly faster and it will have some lag, the plenum pressure will read same as before but it will now have a more dense air charge. The turbo has eaten more air and the AFM is out of sync with the parameters set up by Nissan.

Without altering the tune via a PFC etc, the AFM will sense the larger air flows and start to dump in fuel. Stop/start conditions are the worst as it’s continually fuelling for unrealistic air flows, the black-bumper syndrome.

If you add some other factors like a cold evening and no air temp compensation, I’m sure that’s why so many slightly modded Rb25’s experience the R&R which ends in the Ignition/Fuel cut and the poor old coil-packs cop the blame.

Regards.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yucky. Things haven't gotten any better though. Now you have Emerson and Honeywell pushing these massive DCS/Scada things with proprietary hardware. They're not a PLC, they're not a computer, they're a...distibuted PLCish/DCSish monster of thing, that only they can program because they make the barriers to entry for anyone else so fricking high. And their developers are all located in the third/developing world (and India, in case anyone does not include that place in that category) and there are terrible failings of the ESl variety, of the care and common sense variety, and f**king forget about Functional Safety. Not a one of them has any idea what it means to comply with an IEC 615xx series standard.
    • All of the ECU grounds are to the chassis, the IGN grounds are to the cylinder head and i believe all the OEM body harness are left in original locations, im trying to work out if i can tell if the sensor voltage itself is losing any power to it from the very low ECU voltage. But yeah a manual pressure gauge will help in picking which path to actually chase. Also please dont bully my wiring plan i never designed it to be universally understood hopefully it still can make sense to you, im a wiring virgin.  1 thing i have just noticed the pressure sensor in question relays both pressure and temperature, the temperature reading holds nice and steady despite the low ecu voltage but the pressure reading is the one that jumps around alot so maybe it is really a pressure issue? wiring plan.xlsx
    • Gday, Due to not finding much up to date info on this topic I thought I'd make a thread to get peoples latest opinions/recommendations. Background info -  I've got a S1.5 R33 GTST as a fun project car, mainly for street use and occasional drag strip, apart from all the cosmetic things I'll be doing a full rebuild of the engine with forged internals. Since it'll be getting new cams (kelford) and springs to match I thought I might as well get new lifters and valves while I'm at it, the dash says 160k KMs but the engine seems pretty tired, compression measures about 130psi across all cylinders so I'd like to freshen everything up. This is where I'm tempted to just fork out the extra and go solid lifters while it's all apart, aiming for 400-450kw atw with a flex tune. Assuming all supporting mods (oiling, fuel and all bolt ons) with a lightly ported head and turbo to match (yet to make a decision possibly gtx3582r or similar from Hypergear) I've seen the Tomei kits with just the buckets getting around, Supertech sells most things - Supertech High Performance Cam Followers | Trusted Racing Cam Followers Questions -  Has anyone found the Hydraulic lifters to limit them at this power level? Is it usually found that you can just clean the stock lifters and find they work fine?  Does going solid lifters save any headaches/issues with hydraulic lifters in the future? Any recommendations on other things that will need to be replaced, I know I'll need to get the solid profile cams but can you use the same type of valves and springs/retainers and is it recommended to change the guides and stem seals?    Summary -  Basically looking for pros/cons and wanna know if I'll actually need the extra RPMs from solid lifters or it'll just be bragging rights to say it ReVs OvEr 8000 Cheers
    • Ha ha ha, this stuff they had was installing Toshiba PLCs that were made some time in the 1990s, and they were replacing GEM80 PLCs. To let those two talk (staged upgrade along a ~1.2km long building that was split into 4 sections), was a bunch of WinXP machines running Java gateways... There was no way to put something like ProfiSafe in... Most of the HMI machines were WinXP, with Java program, with a custom button board emulating a keyboard... About the only buttons in the operator stations that went direct to the PLCs was the eStop. There was some interesting design stuff in that place...
×
×
  • Create New...