these stats cant be right?

[inark]

http://www.importforums.com/information.htm

the R32 GTST 400m times of 14.63???

mine has a zorst, running 10psi and remapped ECU and POD and would only just get into the 14s... some semi slicks as well and then maybe that time would be true... then again im not the best launcher in the world.

[GTS-4OrCeD]

My GTS-4 Sedan Auto, Very stock (Just Cheap pod filter and cold air induction) has run a 15.4 in very hot conditions, after a few runs, I am very sure with a good launch and the right conditions I could run 15 flat.

A manual r32 GTS-t Coupe could run a 14.6.

Greg.

[inark]

absolutely stock?

those times are meant to be for STOCK cars.... when i took mine the first time when all it had was a zorst and nothing else it ran a 15.5 on a coldish night... i spose with decent wheels it maybe able to do a 15.0 but that still isnt stock

[red17]

Mine ran 14.6 with a cat back exhaust, blitz ECU, air pod, stock turbo, 11psi. This was on a night that i broke it on my 6th run, no compression in cylinder 6 (2 valves burnt). After fixing it we discovered that it had been running for a while with lower comp in that cylinder, so it was a tad down on power. Feels quicker now that its all fixed up.

If i tried again with a bit of practice I might get it down to a 14.4. While the figure the site stipulates is probably now a genuine stock time... its not THAT far off. However their weight listed is also a bit off the mark (i believe the 32 gtst weights 1350-80?)

Red17

But i dont see the point in hammering the car when I havent changed anything that would make it go any faster

[rev210]

those times are done on a street/bitumen surface NOT a real drag strip. Much like all the other times you will see manufacturers and magazines claim. And as everyone knows the street is far better for traction when you run road tyres.

[kabab]

i ran 14.2 with just an exhuast .9bar and pod and with a 2.1 60ft which i can knock down more with a clutch..

[Silver-Arrowz]

I reckon the place to prove real and honest stats are at the strip. Using G meters and similar equipment give numbers which vary and confuse ppl.

[inark]

yeah and ur all missing the whole "stock" point... these guys are on low end school yard sold from the trenchcoat balding fat man crack

[002 NVS]

I ran a 14.2 with cat back exhaust/filter and standard boost.!!

2.1 ish 60 foot. and I had ran a 1.9 earlier in the night. So theoretically it was good for a 14 flat if i could get the same launch..

With full exhaust/tune/pump/boost I am hoping for hi to maybe mid 13 with a good launch

[Duncan]

I ran 14.3 with stock zorst, stock airbox, stock everything except 9psi boost. R33 gtst, we all know they are better :uh-huh:

[inark]

Originally posted by Duncan

I ran 14.3 with stock zorst, stock airbox, stock everything except 9psi boost.  R33 gtst, we all know they are better :uh-huh:

butt uglier.

[Gardo]

i'll second that inark.

correct me if i'm wrong but arnt r32 skylines faster then r33s?

or does it just apply to the gtrs?

[Sir R33]

i think that figure is a bit fast for a r32 gtst, from what i've seen it is more like 6.9 sec 0-100 and a 15sec quarter mile!!

[inark]

yeah GTRs only gardo...

EDIT**

diff b/w R32 and R33 in 0-100 is about 0.5 seconds according to nissans values.

Sir33 yes that sounds more like it for a stockie

[GTS-t VSPEC]

Yeah, but Works managed to get his to a 13.3 with a stock turbo, so I would think that 14.6 might be possible with a very good driver. Depends on conditons, temperature and surface.

See'ya:burnout:

[VISHES]

u guys need weight reduction!!! hehehe

i ran 13.4 @ 103mph on stock tyres, 1bar, full exhaust, airfilter and stripped interior from rear seats to boot