Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey Squizz, did this idiot have an accent by any chance??? If he did and you can identify said accent, I may know where this asshole works!!

I can do much better than the police!!!!!!

Dave

Couldn't catch an accent through the helmet etc but he was a damn sight larger than I am and would be in his 40's.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/94915-asshole/page/2/#findComment-1731351
Share on other sites

It's a motorbike dude.

well i didnt know that motorbikes had 3 numbers on there plates, never really looked at one up close, hate the bloddy things with a passion. too many ppl i know have been either killed or injured severly on them. stupic things they are. /end rant <_<

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/94915-asshole/page/2/#findComment-1733396
Share on other sites

For all those people who are getting agro about the bike riders that go up the middle... here's some food for thought...

On a bike you have nothing to protect you, you have people who merge on top of you without seeing you and you have people who just don't care as they're driving something up to 10 times the size of you and your bike. Its an unwritten rule, you either sit behind the traffic or you get in front, otherwise you get killed!!!!

Fair enough this guy is seriously in the wrong and i hope you get your car fixed etc at his expense, but that doesn't mean that because a bike rider goes up the middle of traffic that he's a loose cannon or complete asshole. Yes they are skipping the traffic cue, but also looking after themselves as there's nothing to protect them once you hit them!! This is just aimed at the people who were getting agro at those riders who go up the middle of traffic

Edited by Mase
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/94915-asshole/page/2/#findComment-1736194
Share on other sites

For all those people who are getting agro about the bike riders that go up the middle... here's some food for thought...

On a bike you have nothing to protect you, you have people who merge on top of you without seeing you and you have people who just don't care as they're driving something up to 10 times the size of you and your bike. Its an unwritten rule, you either sit behind the traffic or you get in front, otherwise you get killed!!!!

Fair enough this guy is seriously in the wrong and i hope you get your car fixed etc at his expense, but that doesn't mean that because a bike rider goes up the middle of traffic that he's a loose cannon or complete asshole. Yes they are skipping the traffic cue, but also looking after themselves as there's nothing to protect them once you hit them!! This is just aimed at the people who were getting agro at those riders who go up the middle of traffic

Its his choice to ride a bike, with that comes its risks as with anything, something you have to keep in mind when riding a bike. Sure enough there it is alot more dangerous riding a bike on the roads, but thats the gamble you take if you want to ride sadly. If i can get fined and lose points for driving normaly on the roads than this guy should be fined and made to pay back what damage he has done. Its his choice to break the law by going up the middle of cars during stoped traffic.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/94915-asshole/page/2/#findComment-1739584
Share on other sites

For all those people who are getting agro about the bike riders that go up the middle... here's some food for thought...

On a bike you have nothing to protect you, you have people who merge on top of you without seeing you and you have people who just don't care as they're driving something up to 10 times the size of you and your bike. Its an unwritten rule, you either sit behind the traffic or you get in front, otherwise you get killed!!!!

Fair enough this guy is seriously in the wrong and i hope you get your car fixed etc at his expense, but that doesn't mean that because a bike rider goes up the middle of traffic that he's a loose cannon or complete asshole. Yes they are skipping the traffic cue, but also looking after themselves as there's nothing to protect them once you hit them!! This is just aimed at the people who were getting agro at those riders who go up the middle of traffic

That's fair but I have no regards for the safty of a biker who rides up the middle of traffic WHILE ITS MOVING!!!!!!! Hey if they want to do that expect me to give them hell as I always do......

Nothing any one can say will ever change my view on that, coming from a bike rider in the past too.......

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/94915-asshole/page/2/#findComment-1739841
Share on other sites

Please don't group all bikers in with the mentality of the moron listed at the top of the thread. Regardless of whether you're on a bike, in a car, you're a pedestrian, or whatever, if you damage someone else's property you should take responsibility for it. I suspect that this "person" would be an arrogrant prick regardless of what mode of transport he was using at the time.

I don't understand the problem that people have with bike riders cutting through STOPPED traffic, except in situations where (like in Squizz's case) they don't leave enough space. If you have to worry about handlebars taking your mirrors off, it's too close. If they are obviously taking considerable care, then I don't have a problem with it.

Don't forget that nearly all bike riders drive cars too and are exposed to exactly the same things from bike riders when in their cars. In my experience, car drivers are a lot worse to bikers than vice versa. On my bike I've had people merge onto me while looking me in the eyes (so they knew I was there), obviously thinking "he'll move or get run over".

And before I start, for what it's worth I don't split moving traffic, or traffic stopped at lights. I *only* split lanes during a traffic jam, and then it's at a pace where I can literally stop on the spot (usually <20km/h). That said I don't care if people want to split lanes, as long as they're sensible about it. I've seen idiots split lanes on the back wheel. Feel free to open your door/swing your hiab out on them.

Any bike that lane splits when I'm up front gets a rude shock when the lights go green. Report the plate....take the f**ker down.....then laugh at him when you see him again.

And no amount of cake can shut my hole on that topic.

I agree *if* the biker is causing a problem by splitting. If he is going up the middle and leaving plenty of space, and makes a decent effort not to hold up traffic when the lights go green, then I don't care if one goes past my window. Note that deciding to hold the throttle flat just to make it hard for the bike to pull back into traffic does not mean that the bike was the one causing the problem. That's like blaming the toaster for electrocuting you, when you were the one jamming the knife in it.
HMM... im always tempted to open my door everytime i see them coming up behind me in traffic and say -- ooppss.

I had some moron in a car do that to me one time when I was idling through completely stopped traffic (as in, people were locking their cars and walking across the road to the shops). I was doing all of about 15km/h, and this guy got all agro and kicked his door open in front of me and screamed "why can't you <bleeeep> just wait like everyone else has to?". I calmy asked him that if there was a perfectly safe way for him to get through the traffic jam, would he take it... he said "that's not the <bleep> point" etc. It's just a case of people getting the shits that you can get through when they can't. I gave up trying to reason with him when he began threatening violence... I ended up having to tell him to either try hitting me (me in full suit of armour and kevlar knuckles = teh win), or to shut his door and let me get the f*ck on with my day.
That's fair but I have no regards for the safty of a biker who rides up the middle of traffic WHILE ITS MOVING!!!!!!! Hey if they want to do that expect me to give them hell as I  always do...... 

Nothing any one can say will ever change my view on that, coming from a bike rider in the past too.......

Exactly. Splitting moving traffic is stupid.

Off-topic: longest post EVAR

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/94915-asshole/page/2/#findComment-1748707
Share on other sites

If there isn't room, then don't do it. I cannot stand it when wankers on Harley's try it and end up having to lean the bike way over to avoid a mirror and they almost always look like they couldn't lift it if it fell!!

I repeat.... If there isn't room, then don't split the traffic.

Having said that, if they get to the front and cannot beat me, then pick a lane at least and be gracious in defeat, don't get nasty and try to kick my pride and joy. I will follow you to the ends of the earth and snap you in two!! Rant over....

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/94915-asshole/page/2/#findComment-1749301
Share on other sites

Yeah report the tard...splitting lanes has always been illegal, no it's not a safety for bikes thats why they do it kinda thing.

It's a dangerous thing to do and the impatient prick deserves what he should get, a fine and a repair bill.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/94915-asshole/page/2/#findComment-1749652
Share on other sites

Yeah report the tard...splitting lanes has always been illegal, no it's not a safety for bikes thats why they do it kinda thing.

It's a dangerous thing to do and the impatient prick deserves what he should get, a fine and a repair bill.

It's only illegal if the traffic is moving. You cannot overtake a moving vehicle in the same lane. BUT you can pass a stationary vehicle in the same lane.

It is a case of being pedantic with laws that don't really apply to the exact situation. There is no actual law that deals with "splitting" lanes on a bike.

BUT this incident has naff all to do with that.

His vehicle collided with your stationary vehicle that was in a valid and legal position on the road. He is at fault and liable for damage that he has caused to your vehicle.

Book him Danno

(heh, just realised, probably no-one under at least 30 will get the Hawii Five-O referance)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/94915-asshole/page/2/#findComment-1750355
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • Got the gearbox in and the front drive shafts.
    • Hi There I went through a rabbit hole of reading about Xenon headlights and the ADR regulations for having them installed. As people have been defected by running factory xenon I was researching in ways to make them compliant. Everyone always say needs to be self leveling and have washer installed, which I don't necessarily agree with. For this argument I'm using R34 as reference as I'm more aware on the construction of the headlight compared to the R33 Xenon, which may still be the exact same case.   For the self leveling clause taken from ADR 13 - Installation of Lighting and Light Signalling Devices on other than L-Group Vehicles As you can see the bold text "these manually adjustable devices from driver seats" are fine to use. As Series 1 Xenon model headlights do have a 4 level adjuster on the right near the ignition (however not series 2) then these model are consider compliant in that argument.   For the Self Cleaning aspect of this argument clause taken from ADR 13 - Installation of Lighting and Light Signalling Devices on other than L-Group Vehicles Now i can understand the argument that Xenon will need a washer as they are over 2000 lumens, but I clicked on the 12 at the end of that sentence and it takes me to the end notes which states R34 for headlight lenses are plastic, not sure if PL is mark as I don't currently have my skyline to confirm that marking is there. But could you not technically get a lenses with the PL marking on it and then get away with the argument that you need a washer. I went through a quick read of the adr and might have missed something else that may cause them to be non-complaint.    But wouldn't these technically be complaint headlights   Would love to hear other people input on this and shed some light   Edit In regard to the the washer portion I might be mistaken ADR 45 (which I believe is Regulation NO.45) states 12 cd (candela) I dont understand that portion in regarding to calculating the candela if anyone can shed some light. Otherwise I guess throw in a washer for the headlight and you definitely comply.
    • Took it to all Japan day, flogged the hell out of it and took it all, am a very very happy man  don’t know how that ended up in Greg’s thread before
    • Hey Nismo, any chance in the world you still have these seats?
    • I'd say closer to OG GTX3582R, just smaller trim - so 59mm inducer/82mm exducer as opposed to 62/82 for the first gen GTX3582R. Yeah EFRs were boss, the EFR8474 is still an absolute beast and it perplexes me that people still go to things like Turbosmart/Garrett etc when the results people are getting with those are pretty unremarkable compared to what you could get with a turbo available well before those options came out.  DriftSquid (I think) "upgraded" from an EFR9174 to a Turbosmart turbo and promised a comparison video - and kinda shuffled awkwardly and did a bit of diversion from the fact that they didn't get any improvement going to the currently massively hyped brand of turbo from a turbo that was a bit of a frankenstein that had been well superceded in it's own range before the Turbosmart unit he put on there even came out. I suspect the EFR would outperform most Xonas for what a lot of less-insane RB owners would go for, in the 400-600kw range but the Xonas are looking hard to beat up to maybe in the mid 700kw range at this stage- basically where EFRs don't really reach, and before the Precision turbos take over.  What the Xonas do well in the "EFR range" is be easier to package etc, and work very well if a divided housing doesn't suit your application.  
×
×
  • Create New...