Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 168
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

of course with progameable ecus you would retune the car when using a higher octane fuel... especially if you want to take advantage of the higer octane.... your stupid to think a totally differant fuel wouldnt cause problems.

why would a higher RON rated fuel cause problems?

If my car is tuned for 98RON, and I use 92RON, then yes it will.

But if it is tuned for 98RON, and I use 100RON, then the chances of pinging decrease, not increase.

The whole point to all of this is:

- Shell brought out a variant of optimax with 5% Ethanol.

- Nissan recomends we don't use it

- Some of us experienced problems with ethanol blended fuels.

I've ran 91 octane ULP.

It ran exactly the same.

The only difference being when you stick your foot in to it, she pings. :)

There's no reason why the car should run badly with an ethanol mix.

Edited by Cubes
ummm.... 100ron.... aint japanesse fuel an even higher rating... why would our cars have a problem with it........ obviously its just tuning... reset the ecu should be fine... it will return to factory specs... as in japanesse factory specs where the fuel is a higher octane rating...

There won't be a problem, just to make use of the higher RON you'd probably want to tune up a little.

as for the ethonol... the media gave it the name its got...... id rather see the FACTs on this fuel.. strait from the product producer..... i dont think it would do much damage at all.... and seriously guys.... most of you would rebuild you engine before the effects this fuel supposably has are noticed....

I don't know about you but I tend to take the claims of the company that makes the product with a grain of salt... or a handful. The only reason ethanol is in petrol because johnny howard went to school with the biggest ethanol producing company's owner and has a few other 'mates'. Why would the people making ethanol tell you it's crap?

what im trying to say is why is there this big no no about it..... why would they put ethonol in fuel if damage caused by it could come back bite them in the arse.

and have nissan got proof it causes damage.... in fact i havent seen any proof. if someone prove me wrong id stand corrected. and you seem to be the only person that had a problem with this fuel so far.

look proven wrong i will stand corrected... but ive used ethonol fuel in my car for a long time.. dont have a problem with it.

I've ran 91 octane ULP.

It ran exactly the same.

The only difference being when you stick your foot in to it, she pings. :)

Then it's not exactly the same is it.

There's no reason why the car should run badly with an ethanol mix.

What fact is that assertion based on?

Some info here.

http://www.raa.net/page.asp?TerID=146

The thing that will keep me off it is because it's just a way to make money for the 'boys'... the only reason we're getting ethanol is because we can produce it, howard's mates make it, they whack a tariff on it to stop cheap shit coming in from brasil.. ... there's no reason to use it other than that? Maybe reducing emissions but if you wanted to reduce emissions wouldn't you just switch to full ethanol?

what im trying to say is why is there this big no no about it..... why would they put ethonol in fuel if damage caused by it could come back bite them in the arse.

and have nissan got proof it causes damage.... in fact i havent seen any proof. if someone prove me wrong id stand corrected. and you seem to be the only person that had a problem with this fuel so far.

There are several report floating around that show it causes damage.

Edited by Zahos

Here's a link.

http://www.deh.gov.au/atmosphere/fuelquali.../materials.html

That's with 20% ....

Why WOULD you use it is the question. Things have been working fine now - why would you switch? When you look at the reasons they are pushing it (politics and cronyism) there's no reason to move?

I'm willing to be swayed but .. heh have a look at the pics :)

and then..

http://www.abc.net.au/lateline/content/2003/s922066.htm

http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2003/08/...0588321375.html

... you make up your mind

Exactly.

There are so many bullshit posts in this thread already, some of which are answers obviously pulled from ones arse, but this is the plain, undeniable fact that should prevent any of us from using it.

Your car is not designed for it, so dont use it!

WTF?

Mate, Ive tried E98 fuel once, with 50% BP 98, it felt different, but ok. I wouldnt use it all the time though, only if your down to the last drop (as I was when I used it) and need some fuel.

To refer to posts as being bullshit is a tad extreme........

Zahos

i dont know why oyu have such a facination with ass's but seriously keep that to your self.

but just because you havent taken the time to reslove the problem when it could be a simple reset or retune doesnt mean you should deter people from using it. other people dont spend there day facinating over the male anatomy and usualy have time to fix little problems..

i use ethonol based fuel myself.... and when 100ron gets here ill used that aswell... dont see why i should stop others from using it jsut because i gota put a little effort in.. especially when in theory you should get a power gain.

I have used 10% Ethanol 98 from SAFF/Liberty servo's here in SA

First experience was a full tank (51 litres)

The car went well. Knock on the PFC was normal, water temp was normal

Economy was pretty poor, mainly due to the fact that I was giving it a bit to see if it knocked or not

I have used it a various times since, mostly with a bit of BP in the tank, and its been fine, economy has been within ~30kms a tank of what I'd get with BP98

Best bet is to everyone make up your own minds on this one

Early cases in the eastern states of engine failure where attributed to servo's running 40-50% mixes of the stuff

One thing I have noticed is that it on copper plugs the E10 fuel is A OK, on platinums, well it ran a little rough so I switched back to good ol' copper plugs

Maybe thats where there is confusion, what plugs is everyone running that has experienced probs with the Ethanol fuels?

WTF?

Mate, Ive tried E98 fuel once, with 50% BP 98, it felt different, but ok. I wouldnt use it all the time though, only if your down to the last drop (as I was when I used it) and need some fuel.

Refer to post #30

To refer to posts as being bullshit is a tad extreme........

Not really. There are people quoting it's safe without any evidence.

I didn't quote why it is bad either. I regurgetated the car manufacturers recomendation, and explained my experience.

I don't care if anyone uses it and gains 5 seconds on their quarter mile pass... infact, good luck to anyone if they do.

If you have used it with no problems so far, then I'm happy for you to... (really, I'm not being sarcastic)

Edited by Zahos
other people dont spend there day facinating over the male anatomy and usualy have time to fix little problems..

Don't females have arses?

i use ethonol based fuel myself.... and when 100ron gets here ill used that aswell... dont see why i should stop others from using it jsut because i gota put a little effort in.. especially when in theory you should get a power gain.

What theory?

Did you read this theory?

Who wrote it, was it a creditable source?

What did this theory say exactly?

Edited by Zahos
Refer to post #30

But when people start making assertions that could potentialy cause damage to others based on "It felt OK in my car that time", it just stupid, and it is bullshit.

aint you doing similar to just that... you had a problem but millions of others that have been using it for sometime now havent.... funny that.....

"it just stupid, and, it is bullshit."
lmao.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • GTSBoy on your suggestion on another thread I had a look at those injectors and ended up getting them because of the quality.  Got the expensive ones.  
    • Hey guys been looking everywhere to try and find the correct gtr hood latch support part number but only found the first half and when I search with that number it sends me to an r34. The first part I found was 62515. If anyone could help me with the rest then I’d really appreciate it. Or if there’s some alternative hood latch support that would work even better cause I can’t find any for sale. (Searched on upgarage, partsouq,buyee,rhdjapan) 
    • If you've only done the upper control arms on the rear, AND you have changed their length (by more than about 1mm) to set the camber you want, then you will definitely need/want to install traction arms also. Adjusting the camber arms on their own WILL introduce bump steer and make the car unpleasant to drive. Most owners have no idea that their car could behave infinitely better than what they put up with. I'm not entirely sure what the Stageas need, but I am thinking that unless you have massive front spring rates and pretty soft rear springs, you have waaaay too much rear bar. Oversteer city, in my estimation. Combined with possible excessive bump steer from maladjusted arms, that could be a recipe for nastiness. ATR43SS2 is not a highflow. It is an outright replacement turbo. It's a little bit bigger than the largest highflow profile that Tao does. Probably a solid 300rwkW turbo where the bigger highflows will be about 30-40rwkW less. Nevertheless, we're only talking about ~300 rwkW, which is well within the abilities of the stock ECu to run with a Nistune on board. I would do so without hesitation - and I will be doing so when I get my finger out and actually get the injectors and AFM installed. But, if you would prefer to drop a whole lot more money on the ECU side, then I suspect you're looking at Haltech. The Haltech fanbois here will all spout on about all the available engine protection you can have, that you can't have with the Nistune option. And they're right. But it doesn't really come for free either. You will spend more money on extra sensors and the like, plus the work to install them. If the engine was built and therefore represented a big investment to protect, then I'd say definitely do it. If you view the current (and forever into the future) shortage of replacement engines as something to prompt similar protection, then also, do it. If you see a destroyed RB25 as an opportunity to put in a Mercedes or other V12 (like I kinda do)... then your perception of the risk/reward might differ. These are good injectors. You can also get a "better" set of the same with more flow matching, for more $$. 1000cc is where you will want to be. You will need an R35 AFM and adapter tube if you want to stay with Nistuned stock ECU. Otherwise, if going Haltech, you can ignore. As for intercooler. Just about anything will do. You're only talking about ~300rwkW. Just put a big core in there. Be aware that return flows do add significant pressure drop and will cost power and will make the turbo work harder to achieve the same goals. If you can manage a proper crossflow, do it. I'm keeping my very good return flow because I'm only expecting to be in the ~250rwkW range, and will live with whatever outcome I get.
    • I have a heap that i have collected if you want some authentic ones still. Pm me if your interested!
×
×
  • Create New...