Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

That Monaro time is not a bad time for a 24 hour race considering they would want to take it "easy" on the engine etc. Skaifes time in the GTR isnt that bad is it! Duncan do you know how much extra ballast the GTR's had to have?

I may be wrong but here i go...

In their first Bathurst in 1990 (they only ran the R32 alongside the R31 in the last few rounds of the SATCC) the GTR weighed 1360kg. Boost was something like 1.6bar

In 1992 at the last Bathurst they weighed 1500kg (140kg ballast which could be moved around the chassis so whilst it hindered performance, it was located so as to mimise impact) and had a pop off valve limiting boost to 1.3bar.

The GTR has HICAS disconnected and ran fulltime 4WD at a ratio that could be changed to maximise handling characteristics, and 18" wheels

But keep in mind that Nissan did cheat by homolgating a sports car, whilst the rest of the field had to build hot sedans and hatches to go racing. I cant recall how much slower say the Group A Commodores were, the Sierras courtesy of some boost would often qualify quicker.

Considering the Intl rules the Commodore had to run under i think it held its own, especially in the wet where due to the bodykit and tractable nature of the V8 would often be quicker then the Sierras.

The difference in times can be largely attributed to tyre technology.

Fair point about the GTR just being a road going race car - its the same thing that pissed me off about the monaro in the 24hr race - pretty unfair for the rest of the field...

Anyway, how do they compare in times at other tracks? Bathurst is really a power circuit with those long up and down hills.

  • 3 weeks later...

That stat doesn't really tell the story cause it doesn't take into account how many times the pace car came out to slow them down, or it it was raining like hell. But still is a good stat to have next to the GTR's name. :)

  • 1 month later...
  • 3 weeks later...
Originally posted by Southo

Keep an eye out for an upcoming Zoom Magazine when the interview with Fred Gibson is printed.....  You will be surprised just how many teams cheated and what they got away with...

alot of teams did and still do :) it isn't cheating it is bending the rules :P

They come up with some great ideas on how to get around stuff.

Well, at the risk of starting an off-topic fight, I totally disagree. Cheating sure as hell is cheating, and the amount that goes on at all levels of motorsport is disgraceful.

Why shouldn't teams have to start with a level playing field and rely on their driver's skill and their teamwork in pitstops to decide the outcome. Warren Luff's cheating his way to the Brute title last year being an excellant example.

Cheating exists in all sports. Look at horse racing. All the glitz and glamour to hide that dirt all over the place.

In motorsport most of the times it's "bending the rules". Renault with the launch control system was an absolutely brilliant idea, but was later banned.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • It is possibly 55 degrees for the Nismo version. I had a look through the manual and the stocker has a breakaway torque of 2.5 to 3.5kgm. Supposedly the Nismo LSD goes down to 5kgm when worn in but it is pretty grabby even with very little throttle. Worse when cold. So I guess you have three things. 1. Shims. 2 Friction plates 3. Cams Would think shims would be the easiest but Ive no clue how many tenths of a mm shim thickness change equals how many kgm torque. Also not sure if the Nismo friction plates are similar/different to stock or if they are the most of the source of the diff being angry. Think I can write off the Nismo rebuild kit for the standard diff as not being what I want.  
    • Yeah, it was a bit of confusion with me, I rang and asked if they had a boot for a soft top, and then the paint shop when they rang and were asked if it had a hard top on it, which it does, just not a PRHT....LOL Meh, whilst frustrating for all concerned it isn't a war stopper and should be a thing of the past in a week or two In other N/A related news, car is booked in at the end of the month for the cams, springs, retainers, harmonic balancer and retune  I might even pull the lazy arse card and get them to do a full service on it whilst it is there
    • Factory LSD is supposedly a 2 way with a very conservative cam. If you've already tried adding friction modifier to the diff oil and it still locks up too much for your liking you might want to adjust the ramp rate on the cam to be more like OEM instead of reducing initial torque even further. People claim the 8 kgf-m disc kit for the OEM LSD is still very streetable but I've never been able to compare everything side by side on my own.
    • Oh man, at least it sounds they've accepted they stuffed up and not put it back on you...could see some confusion if they asked if it had a hardtop or not, and you've answered truthfully but maybe not answering their real question which is what roof did it have from the factory! Glad your keeping it N/A 2.5
    • Nah, I much prefer colour matched Talking about colour matching stuff, the new/used boot lid turned up, all painted up perfectly......aaaannnndddd, it's for a power retractable hard top, not a soft top.....LOL They are now sending a boot to fit a soft top.....,  whilst frustrating, life is like that sometimes, sometimes you just need to dodge, duck, dip, dive and, ummm, dodge.
×
×
  • Create New...