Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 183
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

OK so a GCG hi-flow would be good for up to about 250rwkw... after a decent tune. I'm assuming that the SAFCII won't be good enough for tuning purposes?

So for all supporting mods:

1 x hi flo turbo or similiar

1 x new fuel pump

1 x adjustable fule reg

1 x new management system???

Would you guys reccomend getting new injectors or would the R34 stock injectors be good for 250rwkw?

Stan

Why wouldnt a SAFC be up to the job? For the supporting mods Im looking at using the SITC / SAFC combo, with stnd injectors, bosch pump and nismo regulator..... wanting 200awkw from non-neo Rb25.

......... why I can confidently say that Shoot Out mode doesn't ALWAYS give higher power readings. Well, not on our dyno anyway

lol I found that funny! man, what Id give to have a dyno in MY garage (at home, not work). :lol:

Brendan

Basically because SAFC will only do fuel and air control? There is no timing control option in that... hence why I said it's probably not the best option.

I'm running 200rwkw at the moment, just gathering information for the big jump :P Hopeful that I can get it all done with $5k

Thats right, so grab a Apexi SITC (super ignition timing converter), fairly rare now but I found a brand new one for $220US on ebay. Being installed right....about....NOW!

:P

Brendan

well i just got off the phone with my tuner and my car is going in on friday to get the emanage ultimate fitted. All this talk of power has made me antsy. I dont think the ultimate needs the ignition signal adapter like the older version does, but i iwll soon find out. As for the zener diodes i think that i will put them in anyways, just waitning for and email from 666DAN. NO one else has a wiring diagram for the inclusion of zenners in the ingintion wiring do they?

Am looking into it right about now :P

Anyone else know if this thing will work?

Satan,

See Stagea section, Gary's thread (SK) Apexi Super Ignition Timing Computer, he reckons its all good, and thats good enough for me by far.

Mine is going on the Stagea right now (yesterday / today), with high pressure fuel lines, nismo adjustable fuel pressure regulator, bosch 040 fuel pump, and a z32 afm.

Getting it all ready for the turbo upgrade, hopefully I dont need larger injectors........

worth a look maybe, start on ebay. :lol:

Brendan

powerplay quoted me $1600 for rom tuning. that is a fkn joke. considering it needs to be done everytime you do more mods. Emanage ultimate with all harness(even car specific harness) and greddy e01 ebc cost me $1600. If rom tuning was cheap it would be a good option, but they want ridiculous amounts to do it.

Isn't there a Daughterboard you can buy through a group buy here that allows you to modify the stock rom form your laptop......

Was quite cheap too I beleive.

Dr Drift can tune them.

I was wondering how long it wopould take for SK to see this.

Any further thoughts on my 250rwkw ceiling SK?

14psi, very conservative timing......

Id say Race Paces dyno is very very generous. 250rwkw at 14psi when its not even in the turbos effeceint range sounds a little too high. Considering you can pump another 5psi and easily get another 20-30rwkw. i went from 17-20psi and i picked up 13rwkw and at least 30rwkw in the middle with a 2535. Silva33 got 244rwkw on 14psi with a 2535 on the same dyno. Put another 5psi in that we are looking at 270rwkw, i just cant see that from a 2535. Considering i only am getting 231rwkw at 19psi from a 2535 from a dyno dynamics dyno in shootout mode. It may read low but thats all i got. Tuning for max power isnt too hard, get the A/F ratios in the high 11's and some good timing in her. Watch the knock, if its too high bring out some timing, its not too hard. Unless you are running no timing, your still going to produce some good numbers. Good tuning is in the light/middle throttle which takes alot of time and effort.

Unfortunately those dyno sheets dont show the setup of how the dyno was run. Dynos can quite easily be enhanced.

Nah, RacePace is one of the best in the country.

He doesn't play with the numbers because most of the people going there aren't worried about numbers. Just getting the best from their cars.

Ash's R31/RB25DET ran 20rwkw higher in Shootout mode on the same dyno, and it's known to be conservative.

I'm not even into the efficient range of the GCG.  14psi is quote low.

but dont forget GCG probably are rating @ a stock head style setup

non cams, and are they counting the fact itrs a NEO in thier info for you?

I had a little run with Silvas 244Rwkw (14psi) with my old 2530 setup and basically it wasnt as close as what it should have been

driver.

youve been racing yours @ the strip for a while now remember

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • They are what I will be installing. 640s for me.
    • Hmm... From my experience you get about 0.25° camber change per mm of RUCA length change. So, to correct from -2.5 up to less than -1° (or, more than -1° if you look at the world as a mathematician does) then you'd be making 6-8mm of length change on the RUCA. From a stock length of 308mm, that's 2-2.5% difference in RUCA length. My RUCAs are currently very close to stock length - certainly only 2-3mm different from stock. I had to adjust my tension arms by 6mm to minimise the bump steer. That's 6mm out of 210, which is 2.8%. That's a 2.8% change on those, compared to a <1% change on the RUCAs. So the stock geometry already has worse bump steer than is possible - you can improve it even if you don't change the RUCA length. If you lengthen the RUCAs at all, then you will definitely be adding bump steer. Again, with my car, I recently had an unpleasant amount of bump steer, stemming from a number of things that happened one after another without me having an opportunity to correct for them. I only had to change the tension arm lengths by 1mm to minimise the resulting bump steer. (Granted, I also had to dial out a lot of extra toe-in in the rear, and excessive rear toe-in will make bump steer behaviour worse). Relatively tiny little adjustments having been made - the car is now completely different. Was horrifying how much it wanted to steer from the rear on any significant single wheel bump/dip. And it was even bad on expansion joints on long sweepers on freeway entry/exits, which are notionally hitting both rear wheels at the same time. My point is, the crappy Nissan multilink is quite sensitive to these things (unlike the very nice Toyota suspension!). And I think 99.75% of Skyline owners are blissfully ignorant of what they are driving around on. Sadly, it is a non-trivial exercise to set up to measure and correct bump steer. I am happy to show my rig, which involves nasty chunks of wood bolted to the hub, mirrors, lasers, graph paper targets and other horrors. Just in case anyone wants to see how it is done. I'll just have to set it up to take the photos.
    • What do you have in that bad boy ? Ill go with the 725cc since I'll be going with Nistune ( would definitely like more engine protection but Haltech is too far out of reach at the moment... plus, Ill probably have a pretty safe tune as its a daily, not gonna be chasing peak power 24/7 ahahah ). Are Xspurt a safe choice?  Pete's great. He didnt mention anything about traction arm length so I reckon it may be good. When I get some new wheels/tire later down the road I'll ask him about it and get his opinion on em. I heard from Gary that you've got the bilsteins too, are you running the sway bars too? and what other suspension goodies do you have installed or would recommend?
    • In true Gregging style...  
×
×
  • Create New...