Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 80
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

agreed with the silver 33 gtr that was one sexy beast :P

Have to say the corvette sounded nice!

Was also very pleased to see the silver 33 GTR from HPI a while ago. It's almost the perfect looking car for mine. Love the leather seats.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/95977-dyno-day/page/4/#findComment-1799174
Share on other sites

well, i was happy enough with 174.8 rwkw, let alone 272 with an exhaust leak!!! :D

however, im only running a fmic, an exhaust with a std cat and stock boost!!! me thinks there is some un-tapped potential there......

Edited by Frink
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/95977-dyno-day/page/4/#findComment-1800525
Share on other sites

Not sure.. I *think* it's the engine originally in the Trueno. The engine it's replaced with in D is from the AE111 and that's the one that revs to 11k. Either way, my bro is clueless about the whole thing, just like Takumi hahahahaha

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/95977-dyno-day/page/4/#findComment-1801914
Share on other sites

What i can remember:

96 R33 GTS-T S2 with 3" exhaust from dump = 151kW

91 Corolla Seca SX, stock = 75kW

Pro Engines work ute - 137.3rwKw!

Googies - 272kw

Frink - 174.8 rwkw

The litle datto 1600 -180sumtin kw

Corvette - 275kw

Mine - 290kw

Other grey gtr was 260somthing i think??

But thats all i can rember/pull from this thread..

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/95977-dyno-day/page/4/#findComment-1806002
Share on other sites

i want one...

Formula Atlantic Facts.

1.6-liter, four-cylinder, non-turbocharged, 16-valve, fuel-injected, dual-overhead cam, Toyota 4A-GE engines, capable of producing 240 horsepower at 9,500 rpm and speeds in excess of 165 mph

The teams run a 12 race season on a minimum of $650,000usd

http://www.toyotaatlantic.com/Atlantic101/FastFacts.asp - interesting read

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/95977-dyno-day/page/4/#findComment-1806042
Share on other sites

Thanks for remembering my power figure geordie.....

I was impressed when mine made 186.7rwkw running standard boost :D

AND, my power FC is sitting in my bedroom waiting till very early next year to go in and then ill guarantee over 200 at the wheels...

Hows that for an R31??? :)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/95977-dyno-day/page/4/#findComment-1812813
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • If you are keeping the current calipers you need to keep the current disc as the spacing of the caliper determines the disc diameter. Have you trial fitted the GTS brakes fit on a GTSt hub or is this forward planning? There could be differences in caliper mount spacing, backing plate and even hub shape that could cause an issue.
    • Hi there I have a r33 gts with 4 stud small brakes, I'm going to convert to 5 stud but keep the small brakes, what size rotor would I need?
    • First up, I wouldn't use PID straight up for boost control. There's also other control techniques that can be implemented. And as I said, and you keep missing the point. It's not the ONE thing, it's the wrapping it up together with everything else in the one system that starts to unravel the problem. It's why there are people who can work in a certain field as a generalist, IE a IT person, and then there are specialists. IE, an SQL database specialist. Sure the IT person can build and run a database, and it'll work, however theyll likely never be as good as a specialist.   So, as said, it's not as simple as you're thinking. And yes, there's a limit to the number of everything's in MCUs, and they run out far to freaking fast when you're designing a complex system, which means you have to make compromises. Add to that, you'll have a limited team working on it, so fixing / tweaking some features means some features are a higher priority than others. Add to that, someone might fix a problem around a certain unrelated feature, and that change due to other complexities in the system design, can now cause a new, unforseen bug in something else.   The whole thing is, as said, sometimes split systems can work as good, and if not better. Plus when there's no need to spend $4k on an all in one solution, to meet the needs of a $200 system, maybe don't just spout off things others have said / you've read. There's a lot of misinformation on the internet, including in translated service manuals, and data sheets. Going and doing, so that you know, is better than stating something you read. Stating something that has been read, is about as useful as an engineering graduate, as all they know is what they've read. And trust me, nearly every engineering graduate is useless in the real world. And add to that, if you don't know this stuff, and just have an opinion, maybe accept what people with experience are telling you as information, and don't keep reciting the exact same thing over and over in response.
    • How complicated is PID boost control? To me it really doesn't seem that difficult. I'm not disputing the core assertion (specialization can be better than general purpose solutions), I'm just saying we're 30+ years removed from the days when transistor budgets were in the thousands and we had to hem and haw about whether there's enough ECC DRAM or enough clock cycles or the interrupt handler can respond fast enough to handle another task. I really struggle to see how a Greddy Profec or an HKS EVC7 or whatever else is somehow a far superior solution to what you get in a Haltech Nexus/Elite ECU. I don't see OEMs spending time on dedicated boost control modules in any car I've ever touched. Is there value to separating out a motor controller or engine controller vs an infotainment module? Of course, those are two completely different tasks with highly divergent requirements. The reason why I cite data sheets, service manuals, etc is because as you have clearly suggested I don't know what I'm doing, can't learn how to do anything correctly, and have never actually done anything myself. So when I do offer advice to people I like to use sources that are not just based off of taking my word for it and can be independently verified by others so it's not just my misinterpretation of a primary source.
    • That's awesome, well done! Love all these older Datsun / Nissans so rare now
×
×
  • Create New...