Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Recently there have been a couple of threads discussing the adaptation of a VG30 exh. housing to a hi-flowed rb25 turbo. I have completed such an upgrade and would like to compare my results with others. I am more interested in the response of your setup for this type of turbo, but power comparisons (all though limited) are also appreciated.

So please copy the fields below, past them in a post and edit as required:

(NOTE: Required support mods/systems are assumed to be fitted to the car.)

ENGINE: RB25det, R33 S1

- Std. plenum

- Tomei Poncams (256 Duration, 8.5mm Lift)

- Head "race" ported

- Std. exhaust manifold, but has been ported/hi-flowed

- IN (VVT still active) and EX cam gears. IN set to 0deg, EX set to -2deg

- STANDARD BOTTOM END :P

ECU: Wolf 3D Ver4+

Exhaust: 3" with cat, long "hotdog" and hi-flow muffler.

RESULTS: 270rwkw@15psi

post-1811-1132730754.jpgpost-1811-1132732720.jpgpost-1811-1132732847.jpg

270rwkw was acheived quite easily but due to the std. bottom end, boost was reduced, to acheive about 255rwkw, and tunning then continued. Hopefully this set-up will last approx 12 months, then the bottom end will be treated to forgies and this combination's true potential will be explored. With forgies i plan to run about 20psi, experiment with both IN and EX cam gears, and have alot more runs to achieve a better tune.

  • Replies 92
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

al i know this might be a bit off topic to your thread but i just installed a wolf on my r33 s1, now looking to upgrade the turbo, wondering where you sourced this turbo from and how it compares to a standard hi-flow?

thanks mate if you dont clog up this thread PM me.

al i know this might be a bit off topic to your thread but i just installed a wolf on my r33 s1, now looking to upgrade the turbo, wondering where you sourced this turbo from and how it compares to a standard hi-flow?  

thanks mate if you dont clog up this thread PM me.

Get your std rb25 turbo hi-flowed, either by ATP (Vic) or GCG (NSW), mine still has the roller-bearing core. The hard part is finding the correct VG30 turbo. It has to come from an early model, single turbo'ed, 300ZX, as this will bolt straight on like factory, but has the larger A/R rating. Your best bet is to ask ATP or GCG to source it for you, as they have better contacts.

I bought my hi-flowed rb25 turbo second hand; Paid $900, which included a aftermarket dump/front pipe. This made about 235rwkw, without cams or porting, but due to the small std rb25 exhaust housing and roller-bearing core, it fluttered (compressor surged) at light throttle. I rang ATP and they found the correct VG30 exh housing. I was charged $500 for the housing, machining and fitting. So the whole turbo combo costed me $1400 :P.

I am absolutely stoked with the result, even my mechanic was grinning from ear-to-ear.

Best part; Turbo still looks factory! :D

post-1811-1132736359.jpgpost-1811-1132736440.jpgpost-1811-1132736472.jpg

Excellent result, but It looks a little laggy.

So its a Standard RB25 turbo, highflowed with a VG30 rear?

I've got a GT30r with a VG30 rear end. Goes for a tune monday morning.

Will definately let everyone know the results.

That's why i want to compare results with ppl that have the same turbo.

On the road it is absolutely great, but during the SAU VIC's motokahna day, the lag was felt.

Also on other threads, ppl have mentioned that after adding the VG30 exh. housing, the setup was not much laggier. But all my headwork and VG30 upgrade mods were done at the same time, so i am not sure if the setup should be this laggy.

Definitely a little laggy.

15 psi by 4810rpm.

Others have stated the GCG/VG30 setup is pretty much all in by 4000rpm. However the VG30 turbine housings used there was the later model Cima/Leopard VG30DET, this VG30 turbine housing also happens to be the same as the R34 GTT turbine housing.

What boost controller?

Edited by Cubes
That's why i want to compare results with ppl that have the same turbo.

On the road it is absolutely great, but during the SAU VIC's motokahna day, the lag was felt.

Also on other threads, ppl have mentioned that after adding the VG30 exh. housing, the setup was not much laggier.  But all my headwork and VG30 upgrade mods were done at the same time, so i am not sure if the setup should be this laggy.

the gcg/vg30 is definately laggier than the normal gcg highflow. i'm getting 18psi in 3800rpm & 20psi in 4100rpm, whereas the normal gcg highflow 18psi in 3400rpm.

The Wolf3D controls boost, using the factory soleniod and actuator. We are going to be playing with actuators and also other components, mechanic is fairly confident that he could get it spooling faster.

  • 1 year later...

Zoom - Are you stilll around?

I just got my VG30 highflow BB and it isn't too bad on lag, but quite a lot less responsive to stock. I haven't had a tune yet so all the AFR's could be out the window, since I have fitted a Z32 afm and just made some corrections.

Zoom - Did you get a bit more response from your VG30 highflow after tuning? Or was the difference still about 400-500rpm.

It builds boost a lot slower now. You have to be above 3000rpm to get some decent acceleration now. Whereas before from just over 2500rpm in 2nd would be fun.

It has an awesome top end, though Im still only running 9-10psi. Can't wait for injectors and tune..hopefully running about 17psi.

Hope I've made the right decision since I'm only aiming for about 230-240rwkw. Will the VG30 Hi-flow make that target easier (maybe with less boost) than the rb25 hi-flow?

Edited by benl1981

Thanks Dave.

250rwkw - bit of a monster hey! Is your turbo a GCG?

Just looking at old videos of my car accelerating in 2nd. Used to get 8psi by 3000rpm. In 2nd I reckon it's more like 8psi by 3800rpm now...

It has lost some of the crispness at low revs. I guess once its tuned when you want to hit it it will go hard, but for the street I reckon that little stock turbo was pretty fine.

I run this turbo.

The standard R34 GTT turbo has the "VG30" turbine housing.

I run GCG high flow and some other bits and pieces and make full boost by 3000rpm, any gear, any time.

Fat power curve.

I highly recommend it, my tuner tell me that he's never seen one like it that spools so quick.

She's a bit backed up at high rpm, but this is because of the size of the rear housing. it needs to be a little bigger to support more kw without running on detonation.

post-6399-1191982317_thumb.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I think the concept is highlighting the various scenarios where thicker oil helps, and thicker oil potentially doesn't help and only generates heat and costs power, in turn for safety which isn't actually any safer (unless you're going real hot). If anything this does highlight why throwing Castrol 10w-60 for your track days is always a solid, safe bet. 
    • Jason should have shown a real viscosity vs temp chart. All the grades have very little viscosity difference at full operating temperature.
    • Oops... I meant to include the connector  view... BR/W - power from fuse L/W - motor negative to fan control amp (and off to HVAC pin19) OR/B - PWM signal (from HVAC pin20) B --  ground  
    • Yep, if you are applying filler it sounds like there is something wrong with the body lol. Safe to assume there is going to be a lot of sanding going on if your still applying fillers.  Picture a perfect bare metal panel, smooth as glass. You lay down your primer, it's perfect. (why are you going to sand it?) You lay down the colour and clear, it's perfect. No sanding at all took place and you've got a perfectly finished panel.  You won't be chasing your tail, sounds like you were prepping to start laying filler. If your happy with the body after the sanding, there is some bare metal exposed and some areas with primer, no issues at all, start laying the filler. You are safe to lay filler on bare metal or primer (of course check your technical data sheet as usual for what your filler is happy to adhere to).  This isn't a 100% correct statement. There is primer that is happy to adhere to smooth bare metal. There are fillers that are happy to adhere to smooth bare metal. Just make sure you're using the right materials for the job.  Typically if you are using filler, you would go primer, colour and clear. I've never seen any instances before where someone has laid colour over body filler (maybe this happens, but I haven't seen it before). So your plan sounds pretty normal to me. 
    • I don't think there's any way someone is push starting this car.. I honestly can barely move it, and moving it and steering it is just flat out not possible. I'm sure it is, but needs a bigger man than me. I have a refurbished starter now. The starter man was quite clear and consise showing me how nothing inside a starter really should contribute to slow cranking, and turned out that for the most part... my starter was entirely fine. Still, some of the wear items were replaced and luckily it didn't show any signs of getting too hot, being unfit for use, etc. Which is 'good'. I also noticed the starter definitely sounded different, which is a bit odd considering nothing should have really changed there.... Removed and refit, and we'll pretend one of the manifold bolts didn't fully tighten up and is only "pretty" tight. GM only wants 18ft/lb anyway. I also found a way to properly get my analog wideband reading very slightly leaner than the serial wideband. There's Greg related reasons for this. The serial output is the absolute source of truth, but it is a total asshole to actually stay connected and needs a laptop. The analog input does not, and works with standalone datalogging. Previously the analog input read slightly richer, but if I am aiming at 12.7 I do not want one of the widebands to be saying 12.7 when the source of truth is 13.0. Now the source of truth will be 12.65 and the Analog Wideband will read 12.7. So when I tune to 12.7 it'll be ever so slightly safer. While messing with all of this and idling extensively I can confirm my car seems to restart better while hot now. I did add an old Skyline battery cable between the head and the body though, though now I really realise I should have chosen the frame. Maybe that's a future job. The internet would have you believe that this is caused by bad grounds. In finding out where my grounds actually were I found out the engine bay battery post actually goes to the engine, as well as a seperate one (from the post) to the body of the car. So now there's a third one making the Grounding Triangle which is now a thing. I also from extensive idling have this graph. Temperature (°C) Voltage (V) 85 1.59 80 1.74 75 1.94 70 2.1 65 2.33 60 2.56 55 2.78 50 2.98 45 3.23 40 3.51 35 3.75 30 4.00   Plotted it looks like this. Which is actually... pretty linear? I have not actually put the formula into HPTuners. I will have to re-engage brain and/or re-engage the people who wanted more data to magically do it for me. Tune should be good for the 30th!
×
×
  • Create New...