Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

$750 is ridiculous.

You guys should be aware that the difference between an R34 turbo and an R33 turbo is in the exhaust housing only so if you think the VG30 turbo is no good because of the size of the exhaust housing then the R34 trbo will be the same because the exhaust housings are the same.

As for the neo compressor wheel being known to fly apart when pushed... what the? It's the same as the R3 series 2 compressor wheel anyway. Is that known to fly apart?

why not just go for a garrett gt28rs disco potatoe (bolt on turbo) great unit and spools up great you won't be dissapointed, and on the upside can be had for $1500, I can't see why you would really go for a VG30 turbo when you normally have 2 of them pushing 3 litres its not much of an upgrade with of the hassles of putting it on and so on I would go the extra distance and put something worth while on there even an S15 turbo GT28R both turbo's are roller bearing steel compressor turbo's that will have heaps of headroom for some upgrades down the track.

Kinetic,

The VG30 turbo we are talking about isn't the twin turbo.. Its the single turbo VG30DET out of the latish model Cima/Leopards.. They made 190kw from factory at around 6000-6200rpm. 363NM torque at 3200rpm or there abouts.

You guys should be aware that the difference between an R34 turbo and an R33 turbo is in the exhaust housing only so if you think the VG30 turbo is no good because of the size of the exhaust housing then the R34 trbo will be the same because the exhaust housings are the same.

Abo bob,

I'll say it again but better. >_<

The VG30 turbo runs a small puny compressor wheel (rb20t), with a large turbine this makes for a lazy turbo that is suited to the larger 3ltr motor that is required to make 190kw at ~6000rpm. If it were to use the smaller turbine housing it would make this peak power much earlier in the rpm and nose over, resulting in a crap feeling diesel power band.

For example, peak power at maybe 4500rpm and peak torque at 2000rpm. Very much like what I saw with the rb20det turbo on my rb30det.

Should they have dropped a larger R33/R34 compressor wheel in to the VG30 setup it may have overshot the power level they were aiming for. To achieve the power level and boost they were after the rb20det turbo guts with slightly larger housings worked perfect.

The R34 runs a larger compressor wheel, every revolution it takes a larger bite out of the air and flows more air in to the motor, as a result there is more exhaust gas. Resulting in a less 'lazy' turbo compared to the VG30 that has been setup for higher exhaust flow.

Lets swap the turbine housing specs that one would use for a GT35R on a RB25DET and Ford 4ltr.

The RB25DET you would want the smaller .82 turbine housing, if not .64.

The Ford wants a 1.06 or greater.

Lets swap them...

Drop the 1.06 on the rb25det and it will make for a lazy peaky turbo with stuff all mid range.

Drop the .82 or .64 on the Ford 4ltr peak power made much earlier in the rpm as a result mid range and low end will be huge. Good for towing but not good for track work or acceleration.

I've now got a VG30DET turbo on my Rb30DET, it suits the motor much much better than the Rb20DET with its small quick spooling housings, I am now able to accelerate through first without boost snapping on hard and chirping the wheels, I can now have better throttle control. It now also rev's harder and makes power where I use it, it will now flick to 6k where as before it would only rev to 5k before power would nose over.

If you do engine airflow calcs you will see why the rb20det turbo only makes power to 5k. 5k airflow from the rb30det is roughly the same as the rb20det at 7000k. I don't remember exactly but its around the mark.

Its all about matching a turbo to the motor.

If that makes sense.

Edited by Cubes

The VG30DET was used around the 94-95, so say the same as an R33. >_<

If I had a VG30DET and was going to put it on my RB20DET again I would simply use the S2 RB20DET turbo and its smaller turbine housing but use the VG30's larger Compressor cover, this will help top end airflow some what but still retain the quick spool and mid range of the smaller turbine housing.

Then its basically a RB25DET turbo, bar the smaller compressor wheel.

It comes down to the fact of; for the amount of airflow the vg30 compressor generates the 2ltr doesn't need to breathe so well on the hotside, it only kills mid range and spool time. :(

Edited by Cubes

hey guys im wondering what kind of turbo to put on my rb20 too.. was thinking HKS GTRS or gt2530 (KAI???) or gt2835 pro s what not too much lag like around full boost under 4.5rpm and heaps of pull right to redline.

whats the go outta those what to keep it low mount and internal gated!

cheers simon

Sorry, but if you're looking for BIG HP, minimal LAG and essentially a torque beast... drop me a line, because all of those goals conflict each other. So, if you find something that offers all these things... shoot me an email.

In ther meantime... get big turbo, add camshaft(s) and tuning to widen torque band and you should have a good goer... also, look at bigger injectors and possibly fuel pump to keep the fuel supply up. IMO, look at your support systems before the turbo is added.

Regards,

Grant

Edited by QUIKBLADE

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, after the full circus this week (new gearbag, 14 psi actuator on, injectors and AFM upgraded, and.....turbo repair) the diagnosis on the wastegate is in. It was broken. It was broken in a really strange way. The weld that holds the lever arm onto the wastegate flapper shaft broke. Broke completely, but broke in such a way that it could go back together in the "correct" position, or it could rearrange itself somewhere else along the fracture plane and sit with the flapper not parallel to the lever. So, who knows how and when exactly what happened? No-one will ever know. Was it broken like this the first time it spat the circlip and wedged itself deep into the dump? Or was it only broken when I tried to pry it back into place? (I didn't try that hard, but who knows?). Or did it break first? Or did it break between the first and second event of wierdness? Meh. It doesn't matter now. It is welded back together. And it is now held closed by a 14 psi actuator, so...the car has been tuned with the supporting mods (and the order of operations there is that the supporting mods and dyno needed to be able to be done first before adding boost, because it was pinging on <<14 psi with the new turbo with only a 6 psi actuator). And then tuned up a bit, and with the boost controller turned off throughout that process. So it was only running WG pressure and so only hit about 15-16 psi. The turbo is still ever so slightly lazier than might be preferred - like it is still a bit on the big side for the engine. I haven't tested it on the road properly in any way - just driven it around in traffic for a half hour or so. But it is like chalk and cheese compared to what it was. Between dyno numbers and driving feedback: It makes 100 kW at 3k rpm, which is OK, could be better. That's stock 2JZ territory, or RB20 with G series 550. It actually starts building boost from 2k, which is certainly better than it did recently (with all the WG flapper bullshit). Although it's hard to remember what it was like prior to all that - it certainly seems much, much better. And that makes sense, given the WG was probably starting to blow open at anything above about 3 psi anyway (with the 6 psi actuator). It doesn't really get to "full boost" (say 16 psi) until >>4k rpm. I am hopeful that this is a feature of the lack of boost controller keeping boost pressure off the actuator, because it was turned off for the dyno and off for the drives afterward. There's more to be found here, I'm sure. It made 230 rwkW at not a lot more than 6k and held it to over 7k, so there seems to be plenty of potential to get it up to 250-260rwkW with 18 psi or so, which would be a decent effort, considering the stock sized turbo inlet pipework and AFM, and the return flow cooler. According to Tao, those things should definitely put a bit of a limit on it by that sort of number. I must stress that I have not opened the throttle 100% on the road yet - well, at least not 100% and allowed it to wind all the way up. It'll have to wait until some reasonable opportunity. I'm quite looking forward to that - it feels massively better than it has in a loooong time. It's back to its old self, plus about 20% extra powers over the best it ever did before. I'm going to get the boost controller set up to maximise spool and settle at no more than ~17 psi (for now) and then go back on the dyno to see what we can squeeze out of it. There is other interesting news too. I put together a replacement tube to fit the R35 AFM in the stock location. This is the first time the tuner has worked with one, because anyone else he has tuned for has gone from Z32 territory to aftermarket ECU. No-one has ever wanted to stay Nistuned and do what I've done. Anyway, his feedback is that the R35 AFM is super super super responsive. Tiny little changes in throttle position or load turn up immediately as a cell change on the maps. Way, way more responsive than any of the old skool AFMs. Makes it quite diffifult to tune as you have to stay right on top of that so you don't wander off the cell you wanted to tune. But it certainly seems to help with real world throttle response. That's hard to separate from all the other things that changed, but the "pedal feel" is certainly crisp.
    • I'm a bit confused by this post, so I'll address the bit I understand lol.  Use an air compressor and blow away the guide coat sanding residue. All the better if you have a moisture trap for your compressor. You'd want to do this a few times as you sand the area, you wouldn't for example sand the entire area till you think its perfect and then 'confirm' that is it by blowing away the guide coat residue.  Sand the area, blow away the guide coat residue, inspect the panel, back to sanding... rinse and repeat. 
    • The detail level is about right for the money they charge for the full kit... AU$21.00 each issue, 110 issues for a total of $2,300 (I mentioned $2.2K in the first post when the exchange rate was better). $20/week is doable... 馃槓
    • If planning on joining us for the day(s) please indicate by filling in this form. https://forms.gle/Ma8Nn4DzYVA8uDHg7
    • You put the driver's seat on the wrong side! Incredible detail on all of this. It looks like you could learn a lot about the car just from assembling the kit.
  • Create New...