Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

yeh he run a 7.92@256

and backed off from what ive heard he didnt even get into top gear

another lil whisper ive heard is that hes developing a 2.8 to slot into it

so should be interesting :D

heres the clip if youre interested

http://media.putfile.com/Reece-McGregor-R3...-256kmh-14-mile

I doubt that he didn't get into top gear. I hate it when a car does a great time and then people say, "it wasn't on full boost", "the clutch was slipping" or it missed a gear".

excuse if i seem rude but please quiet in the cheap seats and shut up.

i was there and i saw the run in person so believe me when i say he didnt get into top gear and he did back off.

and was far from a perfect run.

to be perfectly honest i was dumfounded when i saw 7.92 on the board as i thought it didnt look as fast as sum of his previous 8 second runs.

The man himself said he didn't get into top gear - they don't have a reputation of talking shit (maybe this is common in Oz???).... 256kph trap speed when they usually run 270+ is an obvious sign. Apparently they are working on what went wrong with the box with the intent of running tomorrow. I guess that will clear some stuff up??

They've already done an 8.033 @ 172mph already - so no matter what way you look at it, a solid seven second pass is inevitable... if not now, with the new motor.

The man himself said he didn't get into top gear - they don't have a reputation of talking shit (maybe this is common in Oz???).... 256kph trap speed when they usually run 270+ is an obvious sign.  Apparently they are working on what went wrong with the box with the intent of running tomorrow.  I guess that will clear some stuff up??

They've already done an 8.033 @ 172mph already - so no matter what way you look at it, a solid seven second pass is inevitable... if not now, with the new motor.

The car has already run a 7.9@162MPH (backing off).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   anyone know where I can pick one of these up for a reasonable price? I just resprayed my rear trunk due to fuel stain and my new muse spat install.    added a photo for some content 🤣👍   thanks 
    • Consider a 35 too...
    • He's right ~ there is no 'magic' with stuff like this ... it is more likely that in the process of looking for the short, the loom/wire 'incidentally' got moved in the process, thus removing the short ~ now, that maybe a wire (in a loom) rubbing against the edge of some grounded metal, that's worn through the insulation, causing the (now intermittent) short to ground. If one wire in a loom has been damaged in this fashion, it's reasonable to presume that other wires beside it may have also be damaged, and now exposed...you can bet the green crusty copper corrosion will start... ...that'd be a pisser, Murphy's Law steps right in as GTS observes...but worse, something like that is easier to find when shorted...ie; unplug bulb and fuse, and put multimeter in continuity mode so you get constant beep, and carefully poke about hoping to find if some movemet of the harness stop the beeping.... ...it's still all a bit Arnie tho' ..It'll be back... 😃
    • Yeah, but knowledge of one wire's insulation worn through to short on earth implies the possibility of other wires doing the same. I had my power steering die, because the wire that runs to the solenoid valve on the rack runs in the same loom as the power wire for the O2 sensor. And when the O2 sensor/wire did something stupid and burnt part of that loom to death, the only indication was the shit(ter) fuel economy and the heavy steering. It took deep excavation of the looms in the bay to find the problem. Not wear through in that case, but similar shit.
×
×
  • Create New...