Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Just a question for anyone who has got a winning formula for the indexing of the plugs on an Rb26dett to give their feedback.

For those who don't know what indexing plugs is, it's basically lining the plugs grounding strap in a particular direction that achieves optimum spark characteristics under load. The 'gap' where the spark occurs has a directional charateristic and in most engines there is power and more reliable spark under load to be had by getting this direction right.

You are able to adjust the postion of plugs by using wafer thin washers to achieve the right factory tension while getting the direction you want.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/96598-indexing-plugs-on-the-rb26dett/
Share on other sites

Indexing plugs, wow that's an old trick that I haven't used for ages.

I don't even think I can remember all of the theory for a turbo engine. Is it to point the earth electrode at the inlet stream so that the spark doesn't blow out as easily? Plus that woud delay combustion a poofteenth, so might be good if you have preignition problems.

On an N/A engine (Chevy) I remember we used to point the electrode away from the quench/squish. So that the spark is NOT shielded, to give a quicker more spread ignition. That would be hard to do on a RB though.

If I also remember rightly the claim by the indexing washers makers was a 5% improvement at best, that's both in power and economy.

It used to be such a pain (in the back) to do on a V8, took about an hour to do all 8 plugs. The RB would only be 75% as painful, plus the plugs are a lot easier to get to.

Let me know what sort of result you get, I am sure Moroso or Jacobs still sell the indexing washers. But the plug size might be a problem.

:( cheers :P

Hi Sydneykid,

I was chatting with RIPS a while back about nitrous and we got onto the plugs setup and at the time he wasn't ready to give his indexing secret up.

In the instances I have done this it has always been of benifit.

If there isn't any one out there with data perhaps we can start with people visiting the dyno who would like the chance of maybe upto 5% more power?

The chev example sounds right but, not knowing where/which way the squish/quench is when looking down at the bolted down head is my handicap at this stage. If I had the head off it might give me something to go by.

  • 9 years later...

I think there is little value in indexing plugs on 4 valve engines. Certainly worth it (for the last 0.25%) in 2 valve engines. Benefit would be smaller on 4 valvers. That said, at the very least it would be preferable if they all faced broadly towards the inlet side or broadly towards the exhaust side*, rather than being randomly distributed.

* or even all towards the sides of the chambers I suppose.

I did it on my ALFA. Once. Cost me an extra half dozen plugs and an hour and I benefited approximately bugger all.

Copied from NGK's website.

"This is for racers only !!

Indexing refers to a process whereby auxiliary washers of varying thickness are placed under the spark plug's shoulder so that when the spark plug is tightened, the gap will point in the desired direction.

However, without running an engine on a dyno, it is impossible to gauge which type of indexing works best in your engine. While most engines like the spark plug's gap open to the intake valve, there are still other combinations that make more power with the gap pointed toward the exhaust valve.

In any case, engines with indexed spark plugs will typically make only a few more horsepower, typically less than 1% of total engine output. For a 500hp engine, you'd be lucky to get 5hp. While there are exceptions, the bottom line is that without a dyno, gauging success will be difficult".

when your at the end of the road with everything else, there are gains to be had under particular circumstances with a highly strung rb.... more than 1%. Just costs time and money to find out what works for your combo... most people don't want to spend the time or money to find out.

J.

Usually the gap faces the intake, ground strap between the 2 exhaust valves when indexing plugs on quad valve heads.

Im surprised nobody metioned sidegapping the plugs yet. :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, after the full circus this week (new gearbag, 14 psi actuator on, injectors and AFM upgraded, and.....turbo repair) the diagnosis on the wastegate is in. It was broken. It was broken in a really strange way. The weld that holds the lever arm onto the wastegate flapper shaft broke. Broke completely, but broke in such a way that it could go back together in the "correct" position, or it could rearrange itself somewhere else along the fracture plane and sit with the flapper not parallel to the lever. So, who knows how and when exactly what happened? No-one will ever know. Was it broken like this the first time it spat the circlip and wedged itself deep into the dump? Or was it only broken when I tried to pry it back into place? (I didn't try that hard, but who knows?). Or did it break first? Or did it break between the first and second event of wierdness? Meh. It doesn't matter now. It is welded back together. And it is now held closed by a 14 psi actuator, so...the car has been tuned with the supporting mods (and the order of operations there is that the supporting mods and dyno needed to be able to be done first before adding boost, because it was pinging on <<14 psi with the new turbo with only a 6 psi actuator). And then tuned up a bit, and with the boost controller turned off throughout that process. So it was only running WG pressure and so only hit about 15-16 psi. The turbo is still ever so slightly lazier than might be preferred - like it is still a bit on the big side for the engine. I haven't tested it on the road properly in any way - just driven it around in traffic for a half hour or so. But it is like chalk and cheese compared to what it was. Between dyno numbers and driving feedback: It makes 100 kW at 3k rpm, which is OK, could be better. That's stock 2JZ territory, or RB20 with G series 550. It actually starts building boost from 2k, which is certainly better than it did recently (with all the WG flapper bullshit). Although it's hard to remember what it was like prior to all that - it certainly seems much, much better. And that makes sense, given the WG was probably starting to blow open at anything above about 3 psi anyway (with the 6 psi actuator). It doesn't really get to "full boost" (say 16 psi) until >>4k rpm. I am hopeful that this is a feature of the lack of boost controller keeping boost pressure off the actuator, because it was turned off for the dyno and off for the drives afterward. There's more to be found here, I'm sure. It made 230 rwkW at not a lot more than 6k and held it to over 7k, so there seems to be plenty of potential to get it up to 250-260rwkW with 18 psi or so, which would be a decent effort, considering the stock sized turbo inlet pipework and AFM, and the return flow cooler. According to Tao, those things should definitely put a bit of a limit on it by that sort of number. I must stress that I have not opened the throttle 100% on the road yet - well, at least not 100% and allowed it to wind all the way up. It'll have to wait until some reasonable opportunity. I'm quite looking forward to that - it feels massively better than it has in a loooong time. It's back to its old self, plus about 20% extra powers over the best it ever did before. I'm going to get the boost controller set up to maximise spool and settle at no more than ~17 psi (for now) and then go back on the dyno to see what we can squeeze out of it. There is other interesting news too. I put together a replacement tube to fit the R35 AFM in the stock location. This is the first time the tuner has worked with one, because anyone else he has tuned for has gone from Z32 territory to aftermarket ECU. No-one has ever wanted to stay Nistuned and do what I've done. Anyway, his feedback is that the R35 AFM is super super super responsive. Tiny little changes in throttle position or load turn up immediately as a cell change on the maps. Way, way more responsive than any of the old skool AFMs. Makes it quite diffifult to tune as you have to stay right on top of that so you don't wander off the cell you wanted to tune. But it certainly seems to help with real world throttle response. That's hard to separate from all the other things that changed, but the "pedal feel" is certainly crisp.
    • I'm a bit confused by this post, so I'll address the bit I understand lol.  Use an air compressor and blow away the guide coat sanding residue. All the better if you have a moisture trap for your compressor. You'd want to do this a few times as you sand the area, you wouldn't for example sand the entire area till you think its perfect and then 'confirm' that is it by blowing away the guide coat residue.  Sand the area, blow away the guide coat residue, inspect the panel, back to sanding... rinse and repeat. 
    • The detail level is about right for the money they charge for the full kit... AU$21.00 each issue, 110 issues for a total of $2,300 (I mentioned $2.2K in the first post when the exchange rate was better). $20/week is doable... 馃槓
    • If planning on joining us for the day(s) please indicate by filling in this form. https://forms.gle/Ma8Nn4DzYVA8uDHg7
    • You put the driver's seat on the wrong side! Incredible detail on all of this. It looks like you could learn a lot about the car just from assembling the kit.
  • Create New...