Jump to content
SAU Community

Dyno Result From Fist


bazr33
 Share

Recommended Posts

Hey guys

just showing the dyno results of when i got my power fc installed and tuned at fist last month.

set on 10 psi roughly

power fc Ap Engineering

FMIC

CES RAcing split dump

Hiflow 3 inch cat

3" exhaust

Tell us if anything doesn't look right

It does seem to be pretty smooth to drive

I have also noticed that, sometimes when i get in the car to start it has the clickin sound but doesnt start

wait for a bit then starts

im thinking it could be my battery, or coils or something don't know

seems alright at the moment, and voltage has been on 14.1 when driving.

THanks

post-14294-1133250385.jpg

post-14294-1133250796.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

needs to be done on the dyno unfortunately, they connect a sensor to the exhaust to take the readings. I am not 100% sure but i would imagine they would lean it out by removing fuel from the map cells. U could do this yourself with the hand controller but not recommended as u will have no idea when it becomes too lean.

Where did u get it tuned?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i got it tuned at FIST

but was thinking of checking out matty spry at the gold coast as heard good news from him .

And i dont have a hand controller with my power fc, might have to get one .

What mods have you got spooks ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

exhaust has taken a bit of getting use to, especially with the blitz jobby before being not much louder than stock

truth be told, i love how she sounds now

slightly droney, but have decent sound system in car that doesnt make it an issue

did a run down to stanthorpe with full load and passengers never complained once, so cant be too bad

yer, i was happy with mercury

initial tune was 162rwkw with the old exhaust which i was pretty disappointed with

but more than happy now

plan is to high flow the stocko turbo when it falls appart or when i save the cash

wifey has to drive the car and its our daily driver, so cant go too crazy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i got it tuned at FIST

but was thinking of checking out matty spry at the gold coast as heard  good news from him .

And i dont have a hand controller with my power fc, might have to get one .

What mods have you got spooks ?

Good idea to go see another tuner :O From memory matty actually has some real qualifications. I dont thing anyone else really does.

Also try 101 motorcafe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

sounds good spooks, i'm hiflowing the stocker aswell in the future

i'll see how the car goes for the time being

but next tune will be definately be with another mob .

see how they go

might do fuel pump next, get it out of the way.

Thanks for the help

Let yas know how the next tuner goes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

hi fella,

i get my 33 tuned by chiptorque on the gold coast (where matt spry used to work)

they are awesome. lachy the owner really knows the power fc unit well and i heard he got fc edit and datalogit which should save you some cash come dyno time. my 33 has a fmic, power fc and 3/4 exhaust and pulled 185.3rkw with solid afr of 12.1.

cant wait to get back on the dyno for a retune now with cam gears, full pump, reg and ces dump pipe fitted. hopefully should see 200rkw on stock turbo.

just giving you another option come tune time.

cheers glenn

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Baz, comparing it side by side with spooks graph it is a good result.

You got 187 and he got 192rwkw. A 5kw margin.

Both have similar mods except you have 2 psi less boost, AFR is 1.2 lower and you have a street exhaust (cat).

Oh, and the inlet temps on his are 44 as opposed to 22. Not sure what the equation is but pretty sure if yours read 44 you might have even seen higher than him.

At the end of the day, dyno charts are holding less and less credibility as time goes past so take it with a grain of salt.

Nice result.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

By those readings on my dyno chart

would it class as being a safe reading ???

cause with afr's and inlet temps, wouldnt have a clue of what a optimum level it should be at, to be the most effecient and power.

Would it be worth while gettin my car tuned again as soon as i can

cause too me my car seems to be running quite smooth

But have noticed ( not frequently) the engine warning light flicker while under load)

not sure if its just the power fc learning ( if it does or not)

or timing is just so far advanced

THanks for your comment FATGTS-R

Barret

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • this explains the possibility of several maps with different boost levels
    • ok, I understand much better how we can control the boost and increase the number of psi before opening the wastegate
    • Well.... yes and perhaps no. It depends on what you mean by "spool". For most of us, the point that we would describe as where the turbo is "spooling" is the point where the wheel speed gets high enough for it to start making some boost. This is coincidentally around about the point where it starts making noise - hence the "spooling" sound. If that is what you mean, then no - the wastegate should still be shut at this point. The boost will still be way below the point where it should start opening. If, on the other hand, you mean "spool" as "reach full boost", then yes. At the point where the boost has reached target, then boost control has already started. The wastegate is already open, and has been for some time. Some short time, definitely, but still, some time. If you have no boost controller - just the wastegate actuator connected to the boost source, then you have a mechanical system working as a pressure balance. There is pressure on one side of the wastegate actuator's diaphragm from the spring, and pressure on the other side coming from the boost measurement location (the "source"). This is not a digital thing. The wastegate does not stay shut until the boost pressure reaches the spring "pressure". The spring will start to compress as soon as you start to apply any pressure onto it. This can be controlled somewhat by adding pre-load into the spring, but you cannot add enough preload to make it into a digital switch behaviour. The wastegate will crack open and start to leak exhaust out (and therefore not though the turbine) well before you reach the target boost pressure. Electronic (and some mechanical/pneumatic) boost controllers will act to prevent the boost source applying pressure to the actuator until just before you reach target boost, thus preventing the wastegate from creeping open. And some boost controllers will apply boost pressure on the spring side to further push it shut. And this can be be necessary because the exhaust pressure in the manifold also pushes on the wastegate valve and tries to open it and you cab get it leaking even without it being connected to the boost source.
    • A stand alone boost controller will not give you the control you need, unlike a modern ECU. Your boost will always naturally target the wastegate's opening pressure first, your controller then will allow you to add more boost as required.
    • I recently discovered that I could not remove the outer bolt on one of my rear UCAs. Looked like it was seized to the crush tube. It wasn't all that long since I had last had that arm out (I dunno exactly, but certainly <2 yrs), so I was a bit surprised. I thought I had stock bushes in the rear knuckles, so I ordered some new PU bushes and resigned myself to having to do some dismantlery....and some butchery. It was clear that the seized bush was going to need to have the bolt cut out of it and then possibly some more brutality after that. Upon getting the 3x arms on each side disconnected from the knuckles (with the exception of the seized one, of course), I discovered that I had in fact put PU bushes into the knuckles when I did the subframe conversion about 12-13 years ago. So, I say "Oh, good, I might not have to swap any of these others out". We set to work butchering the bolt out of the seized arm. Stainless blade in a big-arse Milwaukee recipro made short work of it, and also damaged the arm, which added a welding and grinding and painting step to the whole exercise. During the butchery it became clear that the bolt was not just seized but bent. Head scratching ensued, as it is hard to understand how that bolt could get bent. I did suffer a broken (stock) toe control arm on that side a few months ago, and drove some miles with some significant rear wheel self steer and lack of control, which probably was the cause. But it's still hard to understand how it would bend that bolt, rather than just bend the arm. But here's the start of the real discoveries. The crush tube was rusty as all shit. I mean seriously rusty. A little on the inside, contributing to the tube seizing to the bolt (along with the bend). But the outside had at least 2-3mm of compressed flaky iron oxide jammed in between the parent metal and the PU bush. This one was brutalised and still took some effort to get the PU off the crush tube. So I thought I'd inspect the others more closely. The one on the tension rod adjacent the bent one was first. I had to use a 2-jaw puller to get the crush tube out, and it took some effort. It came out looking like the first one. All 6 of them were the same, except for one that looked not too bad. Had some corrosion on it, but was mostly OK. There was also a significant amount of corrosion on the inner surfaces of the knuckles. They took some convincing with pointy tools to let go their grip on the inside of the holes they were in. There was no sign of the original (SuperPro) lube anywhere. I and my bro-in-law have never seen any crush tube end up looking like this. It was seriously like the car has spent time putting boats into the water at the boat ramp. So, it seems like the PU might have been bonded to the steel on both sides, which would have to make them work more like stock rubber bushes (where arm deflection results in twist inside the rubber). Despite this, I have never had cause to believe that they were so tightly bound up. The suspension moved up and down much as you'd expect. The car never made any noises in those bushes that would have led me to believe there was a problem. Maybe the rusty interfaces actually were "sliding". Anyway, lesson learnt. Even quiet, non-troublesome PU bushes should be inspected every now and then!
×
×
  • Create New...