Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

newkleer - download some of the chip reprogramming tools if you haven't already, and have a bit of a look through.

There is a universal "K" constant as part of the ECU, which can be used to apply more or less fueling across the board and is used to adjust for say larger injectors. One of the programs (I forget which) can automatically do it all for you, just depending on the injectors CC's you enter.

Also refer here...

http://www.boostcruising.com/silvia/eprom.asp

  • Replies 114
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

thanks for that. looks like what you would normally change the K value by is what you can apply via consult. but this bit im not sure if you could do anything about:

Also, I used the correction of 0.849 to all the values in the 'boost' section along the bottom of the fuel maps. You will find that once you adjust all those values, and then click Setup - Engine Specification setup, and adjust the Injector Blas-off quantity to the injector size that you are now using, all the values will come back to normal compared to the original map with uncorrected values and standard injector size spec).

that "blas-off" is what i was referring to as "opening time" - i guess it depends on how different they are as to whether its significant (and what the value is used for). perhaps 370->440 wouldnt be too bad, but issues with higher (eg 550)?

The k is the main multiply as most of you may already know.

It just richens or leans out the whole a/f's across the board of the fuel maps etc. For every number increase or decrease it will richen or lean out the overall fueling by 0.1 of a fuel ratio.

So up the k by 10 ( in dec) will up it by 1 afr.

The blast off time or void as its allso know as is the extra pulse width to the injectors that is added too the start and the finnish of the base pulswidth of the injector.

It barely effects the ratios up in the revs under load but it affect the mixture at idle quite dramticly.

For every number up or down it richens or leans out the A/f at idle by 0.1 of a ratio.

Just clearing a few things up with the stock ecu.

makes sense that higher duty cycle less impact the blast off time would have.

what do you think the result would be with leaving blast off time for the 370, while using 440 injectors? (assuming you fix the K via consult). would it idle well enough?

what percentage of typical idle injector pulse width is likely to be blast off time?

Sorry, I still don't get it.......let me try one question at a time.

My PDA still has ALL of my normal PDA functions...it is not just EcuXtend. When I leave the car I throw it in my bag. Same as i did before I had this ecuXtend software on it!!

What happens if you don't plug the PDA back in?

:D cheers :D

Hi Sydney Kid,

If you dont have the PDA plugged into the car, you car will simply run off the ecu's original settings.

With the PDA plugged in, you car car will use the setting you had when you turned it off.

Caz.. )

Sorry, I still don't get it.......let me try one question at a time.

What happens if you don't plug the PDA back in?

:D cheers :D

makes sense that higher duty cycle less impact the blast off time would have.

what do you think the result would be with leaving blast off time for the 370, while using 440 injectors? (assuming you fix the K via consult). would it idle well enough?

what percentage of typical idle injector pulse width is likely to be blast off time?

Not much I'd say. All it will do is run a little rich at idle.

From past experience all I did was Once I set up the K to run the correct afr under load etc I just adjusted the void to run the afr of 14.7:1 as it should be according to the fuel map correction values.

Just think of the void as an idle mixture setting.

have made a bit more progress on software, see attachment

need to add a digital reading to the bottom of the gauges, after i do that will try to make it able to go into "full screen", then move on to active tests. gauges were made so that the same gauge can be used in pocketpc app (hence why it looks a bit basic)

post-4553-1134907472.jpg

colours that make up the gauges would be easy to change (something id add later on), but the structure of the gauge itself would be harder to change. a background image would also be hard given the gauge sizes change depending on how many gauges you have (to maximise the amount of screen used for the gauges)

added digital value to gauges and made it full-screen-able (though not sure many people have car computers, but thought itd be good anyway to use up all screen real-estate)

have a list of todo things on my website, whats there should take long enough to do, but if theres any notable omissions of features i should look at let me know

post-4553-1135601413.jpg

  • 4 weeks later...

128%! weeee!

Lookin' good, Pete!

You know what i'd really LOVE?

1) To choose which and how many guages show up. (and for them to re-align depending on window/screen size)

2) To have the program start up and connect to the ECU automatically, and start monitoring, and in full-screen.

3) To show boost from the MAP sensor or something... it doesn't come through the consult port, does it?

Anyhoo... if those things existed, then I could finally justify building my car pc with a 7" widescreen touchscreen! =-D

1) does that :D

it automatically works out the best config (eg rows x cols) for the amount of gauges you have to maximise the amount of screen area the gauges take up. if u have 1 gauge itll be full screen for that single gauge, 4 and theyll take up roughly 1/4 screen each. on a widescreen with 6 then id have 2 rows of 3 gauges to fill it out nicely. so will take care of widescreens no probs!

2) good idea, ill add that to the list - would be good for anyone thats smart enough to get a car pc going :D

3) cant do that unfortunately, youll have to stick to traditional gauge for boost

Edited by NewKleer

Hmm... some excellent work, Pete! On a 7" wide, 3 across looks to be the goods!

I can live without the boost reading I guess. =-/

When is a beta available of your software?

Additionally... has anyone ever tried to emulate the R34's digital screen? I think it would be appealing. =-]

(especially if someone could mount the 7" widescreen in one of those triple-guage clusters that are moulded to look like the stock R34 cluster)

better to look at what each individual thing does then try and compare them like that

with consult you can view all of the cars main sensors, change fuel injection time/static ignition timing across the rev range (which ecuextend does can do all)

an safc has multiple mapping points (as opposed to the global change), but works on tricking the ecu into thinking there is more/less air then there really is, so the downside is that incorrect ignition timing is used (which with slight adjustments, hardly matters, but problems arise if ur trying to go from eg 9:1 afr up to 12:1)

and an rsm (i think) uses an accelerometer in order to measure acceleration, and thus speed, distance (which can be worked out with acceleration + time).

thus anything via consult and rsm/safc only have a single overlap in they both show RPM - slight overlap in that they display/work out speed (via different methods) and can change amount of fuel that goes in (via entirely different methods again).

Edited by NewKleer

Thanks NewKleer, :)

better to look at what each individual thing does then try and compare them like that

with consult you can view all of the cars main sensors, change fuel injection time/static ignition timing across the rev range (which ecuextend does can do all)

an safc has multiple mapping points (as opposed to the global change), but works on tricking the ecu into thinking there is more/less air then there really is, so the downside is that incorrect ignition timing is used (which with slight adjustments, hardly matters, but problems arise if ur trying to go from eg 9:1 afr up to 12:1)

and an rsm (i think) uses an accelerometer in order to measure acceleration, and thus speed, distance (which can be worked out with acceleration + time).

thus anything via consult and rsm/safc only have a single overlap in they both show RPM - slight overlap in that they display/work out speed (via different methods) and can change amount of fuel that goes in (via entirely different methods again).

I've been considering developing an ECU/PC interface and consult software for quite some time now. Reading this post has encouraged me to begin writing an application for the linux platform, mainly out of curiousity.

Which may or may not interest anyone on this forum, however if successful; linux would potentially allow me to offer a freely available in-dash ECU management + multimedia + navigation package, that will be able to take advantage of existing technology (i.e. mini-PC, touchscreen LCD, consult<->RS232 cable, GPS receiver)

For now though, it's still a pipe dream!

PS. Any idea where to read the G-sensor from the ECU? That'd be neat!!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • I'm hoping I just don't have to do an engine rebuild NOW. Doesn't mean I won't do it at some point. I think a plus point is that the car presumably ran on or close to stock power nearly all it's life so far. Only the Owner I bought it from actually increased power with a standalone ECU and blew the OEM turbos. And after it got thee 2860s it wasn't driven an awful lot either.   That is what I meant. With the twins coming on so late (4500-5000rpm) I hope the rods won't want to exit the block prematurely. And it still being a 26 means the torque curve isn't gonna hike up all that much.   It didn't blow up on the dyno when they tuned it to 500ish crank. So I suppose it'll be okay for now. They did put a Tomei head gasket on first though which did not seal at all, and they redid it with a Cometic one. Which I hope won't be my water leak.   Mainly anything oil. So far all it has is the N1 pump, oil restrictor and a filter relocation kit with a cooler.
    • 15000? ish? Something like that anyway. It wasn;t so much a wear as a tear that then spread. Might have lasted a lot longer if not bothered by just one incident, whatever it was. I took a punt. They are really comfortable and do a good job of holding. My daughter HATED it when I first put them in, and probably still does now. She has sensory issues and hates the way they are all up your business. I'm 197cm and 95kg. Not fat or particularly wide, and the XL size seat is the rigth fit. If I was any fatter it would start to get too snug. Any skinnier and you'd possibly want the smaller width.
    • Mrs rs focus came factory with recaro cs  sportsters in it and they a pain in the ass to get in and out of with the really high bolsters, once you were in them they were one of the most comfortable seats I have ever sat in
    • The NA 2.5 has very little torque. You won't feel much. Those trannies are also a million years old now and it could well be f**ked. First generation electronically controlled autos will often refuse to kick down, ete, etc, depending on what's wrong with them.
    • Yes, but no but yes but no. Those "it's fine up to 500HP" rules and everything else like it were all determined back when the cars were 10 years old. As they are now 30 years old.....what do you reckon the chances of something shitting the bed are? I'd say they are much higher now than they used to be. You might be lucky. You might be unlucky. Spin the wheel and find out. Yeah, nah. It's actually exactly the opposite. Making boost early and having heaps of torque able to be generated right in the middle of the rev range will do more to damage an engine than having to rev it high to make the power. Think about the load on the conrods, bearings, etc, to make 400HP at 4000 rpm, vs 400 HP at 6500 rpm. So someone has already "let the Nissan out" which is how we describe the increased chance of a fiddled with engine to have had something done wrongly. Many more engines that have been opened die than stock ones do - even if you into consideration how they are treated wrt power levels and the like. Again, not saying that yours will definitely have been put back together by a moron. But the possibility does exist. It's still a lottery. Spin the wheel. What weakspots?
×
×
  • Create New...