Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 114
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

quite possibly that would just be from an external accelerometer than something in the ecu? what other things are on the dash? if theyre largely mechanical type things (rather than typical sensor readings from consult) then id say thats what it is

does it say anything in the service/user manual (if there is one?)

Edited by NewKleer

The R34's show the G-sensors digitally on the dash for 2000 models up, and mechanically for 98-2000 models.

The R32 GTRs and GTS4's have a couple of G-sensors around the place, but you don't get to see what they're doing. I think they would go to the ECU though.

I'm pretty sure the g-sensor would need to report to the ECU for ATTESSA functionality, unless of course there's a sperate unit/controller for it...

Also, just to confirm... HICAS is also controlled from the ECU? Or does it just manage the steering angle sensor and the like somewhere else?

Re: G-sensor ECU input for R32 GTR. The last few pages are the relevant section. It's the Autospeed article on the R32 from years back.

Thanks for the article, which for those that havn't read it, explains how to intercept the signal between the accelerometer (g-sensor) and the ECU. Which also allows for modification (i.e. piggyback system).

However, what I'd like to do, is read the sensor output voltage from the ECU (via the consult port)

Suppose we could try some reverse engineering.

trying to read g-sensor via consult port would mean reprogramming the ecu (and knowing how to do something like that). would take 5% of the time of that to just read the voltage directly from the sensor.

The documentation I have read implies that there *is* a consult port (that is, it had an id byte after a two byte initialisation)

it just doesn't seem to be wired up.

Of course, I could be wrong.

though it appears that all the computers get *all* their data as sensor voltages.... ahh, the possiblilties are endless

(when I make that attessa controller, I'll share it with confidence - as opposed to state my theory and get shot to pieces)

While I'm at it, I'll ask this question:

What are the inputs to the hicas computer, AND how does it control the pump (r32).

heck - the same with attessa. I have partial information on the input, none on how it controls the centre diff.

I suspect I'll need to get at it with a multimeter one day...

supposedly air con, hicas, and auto transmission can be queried via consult protocol, but ive never had success. i saw a table of whats supported in what vehicle, and i think the common cars only support ecu, whereas gtr and z32 (which ive never tried) support some of the others

Consult and Conzult work with AirCon, Hicas and Auto Trans in the Z32's. They each have their own seperate control unit but all read from the DDL.

quote=NewKleer,31 Jan 2006, 06:26 PM]

supposedly air con, hicas, and auto transmission can be queried via consult protocol, but ive never had success. i saw a table of whats supported in what vehicle, and i think the common cars only support ecu, whereas gtr and z32 (which ive never tried) support some of the others

  • 2 weeks later...

have released an alpha version of ecu talk while or work on the consult lcd

http://www.ecutalk.com

needs .net framework 1.1, links on the downloads page there

Edited by NewKleer
supposedly air con, hicas, and auto transmission can be queried via consult protocol, but ive never had success. i saw a table of whats supported in what vehicle, and i think the common cars only support ecu, whereas gtr and z32 (which ive never tried) support some of the others

on my r32 gtr the hicas ecu wont respond to the initialisation unless there are delays between bytes but the engine ecu responds with no delays could be to do with the extra distance to the hicas ecu in the boot or even the different processor used by hicas, my ac ecu also remains silent with no delays but i have only just discovered

the need for delays and have not tested for the aircon delays yet.

i read that plms have to send initialisation more than once sometimes they are possibly not using delays.

my hicas responds to hex ff ff e4 with 10 then i send d1 f0 hicas then streams the error codes FF020000 ff start byte, 02 number of data bytes following, 0000 error code bytes ie no errors when ignition was last turned off

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Uncle Duncan Yeap, FI Interchiller  Works well, normal IAT's cruising with the WTA only went from 50°c+ to 25-30°c with the interchiller  Before, when on it hard, the IAT would see 80-90°c, now, the highest has been was around 38°c IIRC IAT is measured under the blower hat I recommend it for the street or strip where your only on it hard for 10 or so seconds, but it wouldn't be efficient for sustained track use as it would heat soak from the AC turning off or whatever it does during WOT to protect the compressor It really needs the AC running for it to not heat soak and keep the WTA coolant chilled My WTA coolant temps when just cruising is around 2°c
    • Hey Mark...sorry to interrupt your career change to hair dressing... but...did you ever fit the interchiller to the commodore, and if so how was it? And, who made it?
    • I've been pondering this, I really enjoy the convertible thing, for me, it's like riding a motorbike, without all the issue of riding a motorbike, mainly, my old sore arthritic joints getting beaten up, and, being able to do it in shorts and a T-shirt and not needing a helmet and all the other gear required, especially like wearing jackets and pants in the summer, or needing 6 layers of cloths in the winter, or not having wet weather gear handy when your 100km away from home on the bike when it decides to start raining As for the hard top and its Coupe look, whilst I do lose all that open top feeling that I really enjoy, from my experience with the NB with a detachable hard top, the cabin is a much nicer place to be, the difference in noise for one, a hard top quietens down the interior, alot, with the soft top up or down it's pretty noisy, which, after 5 or so hours, can get tiring But, as you stated, the detachable hard top totally changes the look of the car, in a really good way, and for me, the look of a detachable hard top is so much better than the PRHT which looks more like a after thought with its weird bulbous rear roof line For me, the minimal effort of putting in on, or storing it after removing it, is well worth the time and effort for the look alone And yes, I'm sure the next owner will be grateful for it as well.......  
    • I get into huffs with people when I suggest the MX5 looks so much better as a coupe than it does as convertible. Pretty sure I don't prefer the convertible version of anything. Good job on the hardtop! The next buyer will appreciate.
    • IMO wrap does have its uses, but like you said, quality wrap, and professional installation, would probably cost want a quality paint job does, but, the paint, if maintained, is basically for life, and much easier to touch up if required  In other news: it's pissing down here, with thunder, lightning and only some small hail "at this stage", luckily all "my" cars are undercover  I've also been contacted by a guy in Newcastle about the SS, he said he will come down next weekend for a look, we'll see how that transpires I guess 🫰
×
×
  • Create New...