Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I've seen over 300rwkw from a stock bottom end R33 with GT-RS and cams.  There is a thread on it somewhere here.

can anyone link to this thread? i cant find it via search. OVER 300rwkw from a GTRS is a very big ask, i will believe it only when i see the dyno graph! Thats over 500hp at the engine from a 400ps rated turbo. even with a conservative rating thats still a big ask!

  • Replies 54
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

http://image-cache.skylinesaustralia.com/f...-1126786146.jpg

well i quess you have your dyno reasults and it was in fast fours as i said But with people on the forum only making 360-390rwkws with two on a gtr :(

Edited by blk180

So if I go to the GT-RS (more than likely) what should be considered while the turbo is being done ??

GT-RS turbo

Dump pipe (HKS Extension pipe)

Tomei Poncams (264s?)

Fuel Pump

Injectors (Blitz seem to be the only direct fits i can find)

Headgasket (Tomei 1.6/1.8mm)

Oil Cooler

Splitfire Coils

adjustable cam gears ?

Z32 afm ?

can't seem to think of anything else.

Edited by Binky1970
nope the 33 greddy plenum doesnt fit the neo......you either need an adapter plate which is almost impossible to get a hold of or drill new threads in the cylinder head to make the 33 one fit. The second option is not one I would like to take....so im still searching for that elusive adapter plate.

Correct on the Greddy plenum... I also investigated this and found the same information. The stock plenum works fine though up to about 600hp, it just doesn't look as cool as the greddy plenum :lol:

hahha your car will be right if you just run 0.6 bar of boost ie stock boost. I have been to wakie many times with my car and have never had a problem. But I have heard of reports of 34s running stock turbo and running 0.8 bar or more and blowing up their turbos.

lol then i must have some kind of freak turbo because mine sees 0.9 Bar every time i drive it, and it's been fine at that boost level for over 18months, with a few track days too B) New HKS GT series turbo coming soon though :D

O/T guys but you could rate the GT-RS (esentially badge engineered Garrett GT2871R 52T with T3 flange and Skyline specific dump pattern) as ~ 420Hp compressor and 330 Hp turbine side . That exhaust housing is only .64ARR so 300Kw of exhaust flow ?

That GCG Hi Flow would be very cost effective particularly as you already have the R34 Neo type exhaust housing , one out one in and no orphan bits needed . Will look dead stock and is rebuildable . How easy is that .

Cheers A .

Edited by discopotato03
Correct on the Greddy plenum... I also investigated this and found the same information. The stock plenum works fine though up to about 600hp, it just doesn't look as cool as the greddy plenum :lol:

lol then i must have some kind of freak turbo because mine sees 0.9 Bar every time i drive it, and it's been fine at that boost level for over 18months, with a few track days too B) New HKS GT series turbo coming soon though :D

you going for an internal gate or an external ?

I think the Plazmaman one might fit the 34s.....as it uses the standard runners.

Just need to find out of the runners are the same on 34s are they are for 33s.

You'll need to find out if its chrome coated too... after all A/M plenums are more cosmetic than performance based unless your making something over what a stock motor is going to handle

:D

480cc will be pushing it @ 300rwkw.

Get the Nismo 550. Bolt it and gives you the required head room

stock boost on a 34gtt is 0.8-0.9 bar. provided it isnt pinging :D

I was lead to beleive its 0.6 or 0.7 ?

I turn it up to 0.9 when I feel like giving it a hit...

R31Nismoid: AFAIK nismo dont have 550cc for 34s.

I think next step up will be 740cc which is a little bit overkill.

Stock boost is 0.5 bar.

I have also never heard of 550cc Nismo injectors for the R34.

Not that I've done the calculations but I think 480's might be a bit small for 300rwkw too.

Are you sure you've got the right GT-RS there discopotato? That doesn't seem right based on what we are seeing on the dynos.

O/T guys but you could rate the GT-RS (esentially badge engineered Garrett GT2871R 52T with T3 flange and Skyline specific dump pattern) as ~ 420Hp compressor and 330 Hp turbine side . That exhaust housing is only .64ARR so 300Kw of exhaust flow ?

That GCG Hi Flow would be very cost effective particularly as you already have the R34 Neo type exhaust housing , one out one in and no orphan bits needed . Will look dead stock and is rebuildable . How easy is that .

Cheers  A .

I thought the 0.64 turbine was the GTR one and the GTST was 0.8'ish.

Based on what I have seen HKS compressors seem capable of around 10% more than their rated capacity. So my feeling would be that the 420 bhp tops out around 460 bhp. That's 285 rwkw (using the usual 2wd Skylines losses of ~60 kw). It wouldn't take much of a "happy" dyno to read 300 rwkw.

:) cheers :D

I thought the 0.64 turbine was the GTR one and the GTST was 0.8'ish.

Based on what I have seen HKS compressors seem capable of around 10% more than their rated capacity.  So my feeling would be that the 420 bhp tops out around 460 bhp.  That's 285 rwkw (using the usual 2wd Skylines losses of ~60 kw).  It wouldn't take much of a "happy" dyno to read 300 rwkw.

:) cheers :D

Especially as the 300rwkw was on a dynojet dyno.

In "Ls1-land" we find the dynojet figures to be generally around 10-15% higher than dyno dynamics figures for the same mods.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yes, a plan for non-action is always my first sort of plan! I'm happy to see what falls out of invision's update. I had been having some thoughts on what to do with this the other day and they all seem to have fled my memory, after various solar panel induced traumas, squeaking suspension sphericals, etc etc, over the last little bit. I'll try and recall what I had in mind and make sure that I put it into print in some form before the Alzheimer's strikes again.
    • The ability to have both a 5500 stall for launching, and a regular lockup for every other scenario is pretty sweet. Does it actually work well like that though in the real world? Would it hold up to track use and otherwise you'd never know you had a stall converter in it? If so, that's awesome
    • The thing is, once the content has been tagged we can chop and change the end result as much as we want. Its identifying the content in the first place that needs to be done regardless of the final outcome.
    • Sorry @GTSBoy I thought I'd replied here. There's a new BIG version of invision coming out soon, it might be worth waiting until that happens as it contains a lot of improved functionality for tags. My suggestion would be to add a top level page (not thread) with some info on it and then link to sub pages for various topics. We could even just start really simple with 2 or 3 pages underneath it. Those pages could just have a view (like a pre configured search result) of the tags we choose to put on it. We could have some background or an intro on each of these pages. My only issue is that while admins and mods can update the existing content to contain the tags we want, new posts can have whatever tags the author wants. That said, the reason our tags are so messy is because of that, so maybe we restrict tagging to admins/mods in edits.
    • Tear down before more damage, might just be an incorrectly installed ring or so and hopefully everything is salvageable.
×
×
  • Create New...