Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I am thinking I might put my cooler in myself ... and a mate said that if I got some pipe and measurements his brother would bend and weld it for me.

Does anyone have a pattern or picture or measurements of the piping that I would need to fit a cooler to my R32? The end tanks are on either side so go in one side and go out the other, not entry/exit on the same side.

Cheers :)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/9766-cooler-piping-pattern/
Share on other sites

Ive been browsing Japanese catalogues in the past few days looking at kits. Most have diagrams to show you what you get with the kit. Most of them for the RB20DET have a length of pipe running along the bottom of the core back to the standard piping. This seems like not only the shortest route, but the easiest too.

If you see this years Blitz catalogue, it has a half page size diagram of it, should give you a clear idea of how to pipe it.

Red17

Only problem with teh under return is loosing some core exposure trying to keep teh pipe off teh tarmac but James's bar might be ideal..... also returning that way makes a cold air box a lil more difficult but,,,,, you do avoid bay soak alot more

Steve ..... so I would want the pipe from the turbo to go into the left hand side of the cooler (if looking at the car from the front), go through the cooler, and then out the right hand side. Then up and over the top of the engine?

edit: here's a little pic :D

piping.jpg

cheers mate :)

keep the pipe from the ic back to the plenum as short as possible , that means you have to buy an aftermarket plenum (joke). The hot pipe (turbo to ic) should be thermal wrapped and again as short as possible. Don't worry about trying to cool of intercooler pipes or anything, they don't tranfer heat efficiently, that is the intercoolers job. Keep them from getting hot in the first place or if they are hot ,like the turbo to ic one, trap the heat in the pipe for extra gas velocity and reduce any radiated heat.

remember : the shortest pipes possible, the ic to plenum ought to be the shortest if you have to make a choice.

Yeah Mayhem ive got a GTR front bar so hopefully when my time comes for the FMIC ill have enough height on the gaping hole in the front so that the pipe can run under the core without too much exposure.

I was going to try running the pipe along the top of the core inside the bumper, but unfortunately ive got N1 slots on it which would have to be hacked up in order to fit a pipe behind them.

Red17

PS: Mayhem, mate of mine tells me hes got a deposit on a VH41DE youve got? Whadda donk! :P

I had a trust fmic return under itself but cos of my bar u lost about 50mm off core exposure.... so i chopped it into a cross flow with a custom plenum

http://www.users.bigpond.com/maytech/skyli...line/close1.jpg

removeing 1.4m of useless pipe

Yes teh lil VH41 should be a excellent install

VH V8s are a untapped source of serious horse

might be a trend about to start

So after reading all this ... and then referring back to my picture ... if I routed the red pipe underneath the cooler, or even above if it would fit, could I then have the blue pipe coming out like that?

That way, I could fit it in the same positions as the stock pipes go as Meggala said, and also the return pipe would be shortest, as rev said.

Cheers heaps for the help everyone! :P

Dont bend it, construct it out of straight pieces and pre bent mandrel bends which can be bought separately at various angles. It'll cost more but the finish is much nicer and I believe someone wrote extensively another thread about why press bends should not be used on intercoolers, efficency wise.

Yes you can run the blue pipe as is, just use all of the stock pipes up to the front bumper, then add to it with some nice stainless bitz. I believe thats what meggala's pic shows.

As for cost, i have no idea. But let us know, coz im thinking of doing the same soon :P

Red17

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • If you are keeping the current calipers you need to keep the current disc as the spacing of the caliper determines the disc diameter. Have you trial fitted the GTS brakes fit on a GTSt hub or is this forward planning? There could be differences in caliper mount spacing, backing plate and even hub shape that could cause an issue.
    • Hi there I have a r33 gts with 4 stud small brakes, I'm going to convert to 5 stud but keep the small brakes, what size rotor would I need?
    • First up, I wouldn't use PID straight up for boost control. There's also other control techniques that can be implemented. And as I said, and you keep missing the point. It's not the ONE thing, it's the wrapping it up together with everything else in the one system that starts to unravel the problem. It's why there are people who can work in a certain field as a generalist, IE a IT person, and then there are specialists. IE, an SQL database specialist. Sure the IT person can build and run a database, and it'll work, however theyll likely never be as good as a specialist.   So, as said, it's not as simple as you're thinking. And yes, there's a limit to the number of everything's in MCUs, and they run out far to freaking fast when you're designing a complex system, which means you have to make compromises. Add to that, you'll have a limited team working on it, so fixing / tweaking some features means some features are a higher priority than others. Add to that, someone might fix a problem around a certain unrelated feature, and that change due to other complexities in the system design, can now cause a new, unforseen bug in something else.   The whole thing is, as said, sometimes split systems can work as good, and if not better. Plus when there's no need to spend $4k on an all in one solution, to meet the needs of a $200 system, maybe don't just spout off things others have said / you've read. There's a lot of misinformation on the internet, including in translated service manuals, and data sheets. Going and doing, so that you know, is better than stating something you read. Stating something that has been read, is about as useful as an engineering graduate, as all they know is what they've read. And trust me, nearly every engineering graduate is useless in the real world. And add to that, if you don't know this stuff, and just have an opinion, maybe accept what people with experience are telling you as information, and don't keep reciting the exact same thing over and over in response.
    • How complicated is PID boost control? To me it really doesn't seem that difficult. I'm not disputing the core assertion (specialization can be better than general purpose solutions), I'm just saying we're 30+ years removed from the days when transistor budgets were in the thousands and we had to hem and haw about whether there's enough ECC DRAM or enough clock cycles or the interrupt handler can respond fast enough to handle another task. I really struggle to see how a Greddy Profec or an HKS EVC7 or whatever else is somehow a far superior solution to what you get in a Haltech Nexus/Elite ECU. I don't see OEMs spending time on dedicated boost control modules in any car I've ever touched. Is there value to separating out a motor controller or engine controller vs an infotainment module? Of course, those are two completely different tasks with highly divergent requirements. The reason why I cite data sheets, service manuals, etc is because as you have clearly suggested I don't know what I'm doing, can't learn how to do anything correctly, and have never actually done anything myself. So when I do offer advice to people I like to use sources that are not just based off of taking my word for it and can be independently verified by others so it's not just my misinterpretation of a primary source.
    • That's awesome, well done! Love all these older Datsun / Nissans so rare now
×
×
  • Create New...