Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys,

I'm looking to buy a stock skyline R33 GTST and curious to know the average fuel consumption. I know these cars are not designed for optimal fuel consumption, but im trying to convince my other half and i need all the help i can get!! :)

I currently drive a BMW 318is and im ready for the power increase hahaha.

I realise the fuel consumption more than likely willnot be as good as the BMW, but obviously, a 6cylinder car never is compared to the 4 cylinder BMW.

Any help would be greatful.

Thanks

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/97888-fuel-consumption/
Share on other sites

Hint: post-18125-1134120881.gif

:):D :lol:

About 2 seconds of searching revealed:

fuel economy

fuel usage for a stock rb25det

I fixed my fuel economy..

Fuel Consumption ???

r33 skyline rb25det Fuel Consumption

Fuel Consumption - help

Hey just wondering about fuel

Fuel Consumption

At this point I got bored... There are many many more threads on this topic already

:):D :lol:

Edited by Big Rizza
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/97888-fuel-consumption/#findComment-1778922
Share on other sites

Mines horrid for fuel... and its stock, i think it may be tuned by a previous owner to run rich....?

Anyways, i use only 98 octane BP Ult and can get about 300 - 350kms of easy driving to a full tank....

Keep it on boost a lot and it chews it like a sumbitch...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/97888-fuel-consumption/#findComment-1778930
Share on other sites

i think it may be tuned by a previous owner to run rich....?

Pretty much all skylines run rich from the factory. My stocker R32 dipped to 11:1 AFR on the dyno. REALLY needs to be tuned. But the $$$ :)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/97888-fuel-consumption/#findComment-1778949
Share on other sites

Been keeping a fuel log for the last 6 months. Stock I was getting approx. 12.5lt per 100km. After mild mods (exhaust, boost controller, r34 cooler, safc2) I'm averaging approx 13.2lt per 100km. That's not granny driving either but certainly not going hard.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/97888-fuel-consumption/#findComment-1782764
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • So where is this message group so we can organise another meet? Keen to come along and catchup. Might eventually be in a skyline again next year, but the Mustang will have to do for now. Also need to get the WRX back on the road. Stupid f**king money pit that thing is.
    • Stock equivalent turbo replacement is a bit of a nightmare. The old Hitachi ceramic things were pretty good for their time, but they have primitive, vintage aerodynamics. The only thing they have going for them is a light turbine**, and there are plenty of other light turbine options these days, in both materials and CNC manufacturing methods. So, the old stocker makes absolutely no power at all compared to its physical size and its (not very low) boost threshold and response. ** and the ONLY thing that was good about the ceramic turbine was that it was light. In all other respects it is a nightmare. To get a turbo that is anywhere near equivalent in terms of power capacity (ie, to avoid it being "bigger" and needing tuning/fuelling/etc) you have to physically downsize. And that is not a "stockish" replacement. Doesn't just fit where the old one did. At least a frame size down, probably need a new dump, probably need new inlet and outlet piping made on the compressor side, new hose connections as D said above. I say, if you have to suffer that much work, you might as well do the same work to fit an even bigger (than stock) turbo, have more power (and hence have to do injectors, ECU, etc), and love life, instead of suffering with stock power levels. Or, you get a light highflow from someone like Hypergear. A highflow that has not been pushed too far from stock. There are still modification consequences here though. HG's cores are smaller than the massive Hitachi core, so it is shorter, moves the compressor housing backwards and requires mods to the air side piping. Plus new hoses. Looks stock, mostly fits where the stock one did (with the previous caveats mentioned), makes a bit more power but can be run at stock boost levels and not cause too many ECU problems. But, seriously. It's 2024. Like - 25 years since the R33 came out. It's time to put an ECU in it. I Nistuned my car (on RB20 ECU then later again on the Neo ECU) and it was the single best thing possible for minimal money. Dial out the R&R bullshit, fix up the fuelling and timing to make it more efficient for normal driving (cut fuel consumption by >10%). Nistune is not an option for you unless you change the ECU, so you might as well just do a standalone. it will be worth it. And then you can tune it up to the limits of the injectors and AFM, which is pushing 200rwkW and enjoy some actual squirt, instead of the lazy barge-like motion you get from a stock engine, turbo and management.
    • He can't post pics until he's at 10 post count.
    • Welcome James.....will be interesting to see how much fun there is in the project. .....where's the pics?
×
×
  • Create New...