Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys,

I'm looking to buy a stock skyline R33 GTST and curious to know the average fuel consumption. I know these cars are not designed for optimal fuel consumption, but im trying to convince my other half and i need all the help i can get!! :)

I currently drive a BMW 318is and im ready for the power increase hahaha.

I realise the fuel consumption more than likely willnot be as good as the BMW, but obviously, a 6cylinder car never is compared to the 4 cylinder BMW.

Any help would be greatful.

Thanks

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/97888-fuel-consumption/
Share on other sites

Hint: post-18125-1134120881.gif

:):D :lol:

About 2 seconds of searching revealed:

fuel economy

fuel usage for a stock rb25det

I fixed my fuel economy..

Fuel Consumption ???

r33 skyline rb25det Fuel Consumption

Fuel Consumption - help

Hey just wondering about fuel

Fuel Consumption

At this point I got bored... There are many many more threads on this topic already

:):D :lol:

Edited by Big Rizza
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/97888-fuel-consumption/#findComment-1778922
Share on other sites

Mines horrid for fuel... and its stock, i think it may be tuned by a previous owner to run rich....?

Anyways, i use only 98 octane BP Ult and can get about 300 - 350kms of easy driving to a full tank....

Keep it on boost a lot and it chews it like a sumbitch...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/97888-fuel-consumption/#findComment-1778930
Share on other sites

i think it may be tuned by a previous owner to run rich....?

Pretty much all skylines run rich from the factory. My stocker R32 dipped to 11:1 AFR on the dyno. REALLY needs to be tuned. But the $$$ :)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/97888-fuel-consumption/#findComment-1778949
Share on other sites

Been keeping a fuel log for the last 6 months. Stock I was getting approx. 12.5lt per 100km. After mild mods (exhaust, boost controller, r34 cooler, safc2) I'm averaging approx 13.2lt per 100km. That's not granny driving either but certainly not going hard.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/97888-fuel-consumption/#findComment-1782764
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • So, the other thing I've sorted is a baseline dyno run up at Unigroup's new location. The auto trans was a little unco-operative by both shifting down when the throttle was floored on the dyno (so Mark had to ramp it up more slowly than in a manual) and also by shifting up at 6,000 even in sports mode instead of the indicated redline of 7,000 Still, on a hot day it made 240rwkw at 16psi which seems about right for 300kw (400hp) through an auto at the wheels.  The shape of the curve is not quite right because it was not full throttle to about 4,500 to stop it kicking down, but until I can get a tune on the auto trans control this was the best we could do.....full boost will be well below 5,000 once that is sorted, I'll get some data logs when I can to confirm For comparison, the R32 made 255 at 12psi (at 4,500) on the same dyno with tune, n1 turbos, cam gears, big exhaust but otherwise all standard so the v37 is likely a little better out of the box. One thing that is very clear is that the standard water to air intercoolers are not up to sustained use at full throttle in warm ambient temps. After about 5 runs (so only a few minutes full throttle), it was pulling boost and timing and dropping 10-15% power. Unfortunately I didn't get that printout and the Unigroup guys are away at the moment, will try and get hold of it on their return. So, looks like a healthy engine to start modifying and the only real area of concern is the w2a heat exchangers which the aftermarket has plenty of solutions for    
    • I maintain it actually looked really nice in person. So much so that I thought "No, this is illegal" but there it was, clear as day. I think we can easily call the wing and wheels/height to be transformative. Not saying it's better than the GR Whatever, or the 86, or the WRX STI or anything of that sort (the internet says it all bolts up so you can buy best of all worlds?) but it's still at least a thing and not nearly AS bad as people say.
    • That's less offensive than the previous gen.....except for all that ugly black tupperware around the edges. Blerck!
    • I leant out the window recently and took a picture of this new WRX. It looked real damn fine in person. It's faster around a track (stock) than a (stock) GR Yaris. It's much more practical despite being heavier. It's significantly cheaper. This gen tunes really well, much better than others. .... I think they're probably a lot better than people expect.
    • WRXs are a pure pleb boring car these days. You need to get an STI to even get close to what a WRX used to be.
×
×
  • Create New...