Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I am making front lips for r32 GTR, i want your opinion, with your stock lips atttached, how much lower do u guys want ?

it's on the stage where i can still add extra dimensions before i actually set them.

this lips featured Brake vents air catcher, and it will e angry for the r32 :D:O

cheers

and tnak's in advance guys

fred

www.topstage.com

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/98599-r32-gtr-front-lip/
Share on other sites

ooh, i need a new one of those lol, mangled my one with my driveway :S being able to go a bit lower would be good but...

would be cool if they were that flexi-fiberglass stuff! thay are pretty low as it is, mine has stock suspension & ride height and took out my lip with my driveway :D

you guys do realise that none of the fibre glass or carbon-fibre or flexi glass will be more durable than the standard one right? the standard one is like a rubbery plastic.

good ol plastic takes those bangs and scrapes i have almost worn all the bottom of one side on my GTR and i've only had it 6 weeks stupid driveway but thank goodness for my job custom carbon i'm gonna make a mould for the 33 GTR lower lip we already have the mould for the 32 GTR lower lip anyone interested contact myself on here or at work Custom Carbon 07 38652014

  • 2 weeks later...

i have decided to go 20mm lower than stock lip, for the sake of max aero effect. the lip will be made from flexi FRP . it's a new design that is not screwed from underneath the bar that will get ripped on scrapes.

it will be 2 bolt and easy access to remove and attach system.

i will do stock lip soon. Carbon lips are bad news for durability, they are stiff and will brake easily. My new Flexi FRP will take good punishments as well as the newly designed attachment system.

It will be ready soon guys....... safe up now.

guys, say bye to stock lips especially fiberglass one, they are bad news since it's attached under the bar, it will get squashed on your 1st scrapes.

Topstage lips are designed with our easy remove system that actually minimise breakage.

i will post pics of the design shortly.

It’s amassing how many people actually need this bloody thing!

20mm lower sounds nice to me. Mine is already slightly lower then stock so this should look great.

Really looking forward to seeing the final product.

I'd like to see the 20mm lower lip. I have to remove the lip to get my car on the trailer going to events which is a right PITA, so a lip that's quicker and easier to R&R would be great. a bit lower is a bonus for track work. If they look good, I'll take one

  • 4 weeks later...
  • 2 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Lucky man, who owns it in the family? Any pics? 
    • The engine stuff is Greg Autism to the Max. I contacted Tony Mamo previously from AFR who went off to make his own company to further refine AFR heads. He is a wizard in US LS world. Pretty much the best person on earth who will sell you things he's done weird wizard magic to. The cam spec is not too different. I have a 232/234 .600/603 lift, 114LSA cam currently. The new one is 227/233 .638 .634. The 1.8 ratio roller rockers will effectively push this cam into the ~.670 range. These also get Mamo'ified to be drilled out and tapped to use a 10mm bolt over an 8mm for better stability. This is what lead to the cam being specced. The plan is to run it to 6800. (6600 currently). The Johnson lifters are to maintain proper lift at heavy use which is something the LS7's supposedly fail at and lose a bit of pressure, robbing you of lift at higher RPM. Hollow stem valves for better, well everything, Valve train control. I dunno. Hollow is better. The valves are also not on a standard valve angle. Compression ratio is going from 10.6 to 11.3. The cam is smaller, but also not really... The cam was specced when I generated a chart where I counted the frames of a lap video I had and noted how much of the time in % I spent at what RPM while on track at Sandown. The current cam/heads are a bit mismatched, the standard LS1 heads are the restriction to power, which is why everyone CNC's them to get a pretty solid improvement. Most of the difference between LS1->LS2->LS3 is really just better stock heads. The current cam is falling over about 600rpm earlier than it 'should' given the rest of my current setup. CNC'ing heads closes the gap with regards to heads. Aftermarket heads eliminate the gap and go further. The MMS heads go even further than that, and the heads I have in the box could quite easily be bolted to a 7.0 427ci or 454 and not be any restriction at all. Tony Mamo previously worked with AFR, designed new heads from scratch then eventually founded his own business. There he takes the AFR items and performs further wizardry, CNC'ing them and then manually porting the result. He also ports the FAST102 composite manifold: Before and after There's also an improved racing crank scraper and windage tray. Helps to keep oil in the pan. Supposedly gains 2% power. Tony also ports Melling oil pumps, so you get more oil pressure down low at idle, and the same as what you want up top thanks to a suitable relief spring. There's also the timing chain kit with a Torrington bearing to make sure the cam doesn't have any thrust. Yes I'll post a before and after when it all eventually goes together. It'll probably make 2kw more than a setup that would be $15,000 cheaper :p
    • Because the cars wheels are on blocks, you slide under the car.   Pretty much all the bolts you touched should have been put in, but not fully torque up.   Back them off a turn or two, and then tighten them up from under the car with the wheels sitting on the blocks holding car up in the air.
    • Yes. Imagine you have the car on the ground, and you mine away all the ground under and around it, except for the area directly under each individual wheel. That's exactly how it'd look, except the ground will be what ever you make the bit under each wheel from
    • Yes, if you set the "height" right so that it's basically where it would be when sitting on the wheel. It's actually exactly how I tighten bolts that need to be done that way. However....urethane bushes do NOT need to be done that way. The bush slides on both the inner and outer. It's only rubber bushes that are bonded to the outer that need to be clamped to the crush tube in the "home" position. And my car is so full of sphericals now that I have very few that I need to do properly and I sometimes forget and have to go back and fix it afterwards!
×
×
  • Create New...