Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Prob sounds a little funny, but unsure of what power its making at the moment as when i picked it up, the workshop had forgot to print out the graph for me. Have to go back once they open again....also, there's still a few little issues i have with the tuning that they have done (runs a little rough, couple of flat spots, etc).

Its already got a Bosch 040 pump in it, and have Sard 700cc injectors, Tomei 260 poncams and an adjustable fuel reg to go in next.

Im looking at getting the bottom end rebuilt also, I know that forged rods and pistons are a must...what other areas should i look at while rebuilding??

My R32 GTR (i just sold it last week) :D

was revving to 8500rpm. Tomei rods, pistons, cams. stock crank. was fine when i had it.

but with anything.

Big Revs & Big Boost = Big Bangs

hahaha

nah seriously, sustained thrashing, repeated high revs with high boost is bound to cause more wear and tear on a motor and shorten its life.

theres prople running 9000, 10000, 11000 rpms on RB26s...

depends on the exact hardware....

just how often to you want to rebuild it

Revs dont always = more power.A person of moderate intelligence would do a power run on a dyno,see where max.power is made and where it starts to fall away.Then purchase a shift light and then set it to trigger 3-400 rpm below peak power.Generally the majority are suprised to see where peak power is made.Usually well before this 8500 crap.

lol

what you are describing is not always the case either...

i might not be making more power at 8500 than 7500, the more average revs you have your car in the max powerband the faster it would be.

so for example.

4500rpm - 200kw

5500rpm - 250kw

6500rpm - 275kw

7500rpm - 310kw

8500rpm - 295kw

So in this case my average power accross this range is: 266kw

If i change my limiter to 7500rpm it is 258kw

Thats a lame example but proves the point. In my Case it was more extreme and was very helpful to have a higher average power output.

thanks

Michael

Then purchase a shift light and then set it to trigger 3-400 rpm below peak power.Generally the majority are suprised to see where peak power is made.Usually well before this 8500 crap.

Wouldnt you want to set it 400-500rpm above max power so that when you shift it doesnt dip much below max power?

lol

what you are describing is not always the case either...

i might not be making more power at 8500 than 7500, the more average revs you have your car in the max powerband the faster it would be.

so for example.

4500rpm - 200kw

5500rpm - 250kw

6500rpm - 275kw

7500rpm - 310kw

8500rpm - 295kw

So in this case my average power accross this range is: 266kw

If i change my limiter to 7500rpm it is 258kw

Thats a lame example but proves the point. In my Case it was more extreme and was very helpful to have a higher average power output.

thanks

Michael

Average power?? thats for dyno comps.In real world,once u pass max power mark,you are going slower.Revving uselessly for no gain

no because reaction time.light triggers so by the time you shift,you are at about max Power.

Im talking about on a track, surely you would want to shift slightly above max power, it makes more sense and everyone has always told me to do it as this way you will have more power in the next gear.

eg.

let use the above dyno results and assume a 2k drop in revs.

Shift at 7500rpm 310kw and it drops to 5500rpm at 250kw average power = 278kw

or shift at 8500rpm at 295kw and it drops to 6500rpm at 275kw average power = 293kw

Shifting higher = more power available across the spread.

Yes you are correct you wont be making as much power at the top of the gear but once you change gear you will be making more then if you shift lower and hence your overall average power will be higher. Say once your in a high gear like 4-5th and the revs dont drop as much you could work it out and probably shift much lower then in early gears like 1-3rd

Not sure of what exactly needs done to rev high, but probably stronger crank bearings for a start...

As for the change point, you are always going to accelerate faster by revving an engine out, due to the increase in tractive effort (torque applied to the road) in a lower gear - gears are just torque multipliers...

Revs are a very good way to more power - which is just a factor of torque x revs - my T78 spools after 5k (maybe 4.5k in higher gears) and would be a pain to drive if the engine wasn't built for 8500rpm...

Cheers :blink:

Rog

Average power?? thats for dyno comps.In real world,once u pass max power mark,you are going slower.Revving uselessly for no gain

BZZZZZZ. WRONG.

have a think about it...

heres one of my first dyno sheets. this wasnt how it currently is but its a great example...

all kw at 4 wheels

http://www.gunnamotorsport.com/wrxkilla/415.GIF

So with a 7500 limiter i change gear and it goes back to 4500rpm and accelerated again..

4500rpm -100kw

5000rpm -140kw

5500rpm - 190kw

6000rpm - 280kw

6500rpm - 330kw

7000rpm - 380kw

7500rpm - 415kw

Average 262kw

With an 8500 limiter i change gear it goes back to 5500rpm (note last 2 are guess as its not plotted obviously)

5500rpm - 190kw

6000rpm - 280kw

6500rpm - 330kw

7000rpm - 380kw

7500rpm - 415kw

8000rpm - 410kw

8500rpm - 400kw

Average 343kw

Now Peak power means nothing. Your telling me that if i have an average of 80kw more accross my rev range (thats used through the gears) it not going to be faster?

your argument makes no sense...

lol

Sure helped me at the track...

michael

shouldn't you look at torque moreso?

you want a huge torque curve from idle to redline, big and flat!

(haha well your not gunna get torque from idle on a small capacity RB) but the idea remains, huge wide torque band/curve for quick times.

Tractive effort curves are the best - i.e. torque at the road.

e.g.:

trans%20Gear%20Tractive%20Force.gif

You see how tractive effort decreases in each gear, and you should change up when the lower gear curve drops as low as the next gear's tractive effort...

Cheers :)

Rog

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • And at over $2 per litre I'm starting to consider setting up a corn mash still and converting over to alcohol and running mine on it !  Up side of that is it all doesn't have to go into the car ! Win win !
    • H2 (for cars) will never happen. It's not reasonable for any number of reasons. It's also not reasonable for almost all of the industrial uses that the fanbois say that it will be used for, again for a large number of reasons. There are some cases where it will be good. But, even those will be massively hampered by the economics. The only way that H2 can be economic is if we somehow manage to get from where we are to the other side of the economic-valley-of-death in which no-one can operate. You need there to be sufficient renewable generated electricity to be available so that it is effectively free. Once you are there, you can do whatever the hell you want and hang the efficiency. But until you get there, the ever diminishing value of electricity makes it harder and harder to encourage businesses to build the new generation capacity, and they will simply stop investing in generation projects. (I kinda think there needs to be just government money spent on building the required capacity in a non-commercial way, similar to how the first fossil fueled grids were built, as national-government owned utilities. And probably some nuclear in there to start. But this all should have started 10-15 years ago to avoid the chasm of death that we face right now). Synth fuels will be much more likely, but will only occur is there is at least some renewable H2 production, because you need H2 to do it. And you need stacks of free (or at least extraordinarily cheap) energy because assembling molecules back into fuels is exactly the opposite process to burning the fuel, and the reason we burn fuels is because there is so much energy squeezed into each molecule. So you're somewhat subject to the same economic valley of death problem as above anyway. That is unless people are willing to pay the current equivalent of $5 or $6 per litre of petrol-ish liquid fuels. Can you imagine it? The squealing at $2 now is bad enough.
    • This is so cool. Get a dashcam that records audio and hopefully you'll catch it.  Maybe there's a brand or some kind of markings on the back ? Are the pics hand drawn? I love it so much.
    • Hahaha yep, point(s) taken. I just like seeing different things and an EV in an R32 is pretty different. I'm not on the EV band wagon, I'm waiting for synthetic fuels or hydrogen personally. 
×
×
  • Create New...