Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

only because its been covered 100's of times before and the search button is your friend.

If you wanna get back onto specifically ECU, and not the AUTO part of the 300rwkw, then this thread has done its use-by :P

he r31nismoid i have looked thru many a thread, yet still havent got very far.. what would you recomend for me to get as a ecu? or can you point me to a thread that might help... cheers...

Have a chat with the guys at MV Automatics in Blackwood (Adelaide SA) they have done a lot of this stuff. You can get Valve Bodies, Torque converters, Carbon Fiber Clutch packs (I believe) etc from them. I have also heard that some of the Nissan Patrol parts are interchangable for high torque applications.

Remember its not the KW that will kill a transmission its the Torque and heat.

Once again the ECU and Auto gearbox ECU questions get totally off the plot.

Search all you like, there is no full ECU replacement for auto Skylines. The current situation, as I see it, is you have 4 choices;

1. Suffer harsh gearchanges and reduced gearbox life and use any ECU you like. They are all the same as far as the gearbox is concerned. None of them have the gearshift logic programming for cutting/retarding the ignition timing on gearchanges. Saying that Microtech or Link or Power FC or anyother ECU is better for autos is absolute crap, NONE of them have the programming.

2. Use piggy backs, SAFC, SITC, EManage (there is a claim that EManage now works with Skyline ignition, but it is early days yet) or Exede (still under development). They all retain the standard ECU and therefore its program for gearshift logic ignition retard. What's the limit as far as amx power is concerned? I don't know, I haven't seen anyone reach 300 rwkw with piggy backs yet, there are a few around 250 rwkw though.

3. Change the gearbox to manual and use whatever ECU you like.

4. Change to a stronger auto, you will still have harsh changes and the life of the gearbox will be less (than it would with ECU programing for gearshift). Or upgrade the components in the standard gearbox, so they last a bit longer. Or use a manual shift controller, so you decide when the gearchanges are going to occur (you can take your foot off the throttle on the gearchange).

This is not going to change as far as I can see (so don't search again tomorrow for a magic solution) because no one is going to spend the money developing the programming for an aftermarket ECU for Nissan autos. It would simply cost far too much and be unsaleable (no one would pay the price). This has been the case since 1989 so why would it change now?

:D cheers :P

PS; Yes, there are Power FC's for auto Toyotas but they have comletely different logic in their gearshift and ECU. This means no complex programming is required (like a Nissan).

Edited by Sydneykid

just a question...

I have been led to believe that when setting up any aftermarket ecu eg wolf, power fc, etc they will give you grief with gear changes..

But has any one tried leaving the standard computer in control of the auto and other car functions and wiring in the aftermarket ecu to control timing, fuel and boost etc.. basically running the engine from the wolf and the trans and car from the standard ecu.. i believe this can be done just by getting another ecu loom plug from the wreckers and cutting out the wires not needed... any thoughts?

doesnt work , read above .

"1. Suffer harsh gearchanges and reduced gearbox life and use any ECU you like. They are all the same as far as the gearbox is concerned. None of them have the gearshift logic programming for cutting/retarding the ignition timing on gearchanges. "

SK has completely summerised they options avaliable and there are no more .

doesnt work , read above .

"1. Suffer harsh gearchanges and reduced gearbox life and use any ECU you like. They are all the same as far as the gearbox is concerned. None of them have the gearshift logic programming for cutting/retarding the ignition timing on gearchanges. "

SK has completely summerised they options avaliable and there are no more .

hence read what i said...

The two ecus would have to be able to communicate in some way - like the stock one would have to be able to cut the timing etc when shifting... don't see how that would work tho... would be really complicated if at all possible..

Yes, a heap of people have tryed wiring over the top of the original harness. The problem is that in order for a proper change the ignition must be cut back a certain degree as a sort of torque reduction operation. Now if you could use the output of any one of the torque solenoids as input into a computer that was able to retard timing a certain amont then it would be able to be done. How well it would work is unknown and I only now of one computer that could do it.

there is no shift logic in the ecu you want to control the engine.

also you will have problems sharing sensors , for example the TPS signal which both ecus will require just to operate properly let along change gears properly

Thats what I was thinking - The ECU's would have to know when to let each one take over to control the shifting(Timing etc)... I don't think it would possible(Well not cheaply or simply) It would be too complicated...

You shouldn't share any sensors when wiring an aftermarket computer over the top of the original ecu as the internal biasing will most likely be different. Whenever we wiring in like this we always install new CLT and IAT and sometimes TPS sensors.

cheers for your imput guys... it was actually the sales rep from wolf that suggested wiring the two computers together.. he may have ment leaving the standard computer in control of timing so therfore it can control the auto, and use the wolf for everything else.. not sure.. but he was fairly sure it would and does work well...

. it was actually the sales rep from wolf that suggested wiring the two computers together.. ..

thats no surpise , there was a very prominant wolf dealer on here who insisted that it would work also until you finally pinned him down on the facts and then it was admitted it acted exactly like every other ecu

so dont worry many of us went through the same process of investigation and finally acceptance of our fate when we got a 33 auto

then i just got a manual conversion and powerfc and never worried about it ever again

just a question...

I have been led to believe that when setting up any aftermarket ecu eg wolf, power fc, etc they will give you grief with gear changes..

But has any one tried leaving the standard computer in control of the auto and other car functions and wiring in the aftermarket ecu to control timing, fuel and boost etc.. basically running the engine from the wolf and the trans and car from the standard ecu.. i believe this can be done just by getting another ecu loom plug from the wreckers and cutting out the wires not needed... any thoughts?

You could use any ECU to control the fuel and use the standard ECU to control the ignition (for cut/retard on gearchanges). The control of ignition timing must at all times remain with the ECU that has the shift logic programming (ie; the standard ECU). That solution would be hardly any better than a piggy back solution like an SAFC or a DFA. It would certainly be inferior to SAFC + SITC or EManage (if it is finally bug free) or Exede (when the development is finished).

:D cheers :P

PS, quick clarification, the (engine) ECU has absolutely nothing to do with the actual changing of gears. That is handled by the (transmission) ECU.

Edited by Sydneykid

thanks for being truthful... I hate when sale guys bullshit to you just to get a sale.

so then i change my question... emanage, emanage ultimate, or rebuilt vlturbo trans with a high stall and install power fc...

obviously the last option is big dollars but the best result...

amy thoughts :P

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I understand your sarcastic exasperation. But to be fair - the baffles do indeed fit OEM cam covers. They did omit to say that you need to do a bunch of stuff. But they do fit them.
    • Got started on the modification to make these splash plates fit over the long weekend. First the surprisingly time consuming task of swapping all the cam cap bolts to Tomei cam cap studs. I did the method of removing one bolt at a time, applying loctite to the stud, double nutting to torque as the manual described. Then carefully unlocking the nuts without disrupting the torque of the stud (and going back to re-torque a few times when it slipped). Finally applying the nut and torquing to spec. Repeat x28 Next up I went about removing the stock cam cover baffle so I could ensure it was fully clean after drilling for stud clearance.  As the blind rivets holding the baffle on were domed I used a punch to mark the center then used 4mm drill bit to carefully drill out the rivet without going too far part the baffle. As seen in other thread here is what is inside the stock baffles I decided on M4x6mm bolts to bolt the baffle plate back on with. I used a 3.3mm drill bit with some tape to mark the depth at ~8mm. Next was to tap the threads using a cheap bunnings kit M4x0.7. With the baffle removed I also drilled out the spot welds holding in the baffle plate oil returns. Unsure whether this was the best option or if I should have cut holes in the Hypertune splash plates to allow the oil drains to still function... time will tell. I then removed the the Hypertune splash plates so I could rest the cam cover on top and use a dab of grease to mark where the studs impacted the oem cam cover baffle. The most obvious spot was on the hump from the stock mesh is held. Using this hole as an anchor I bolted the oem baffle plate back into the cam cover and lined up the Hypertune splash plate. Marked the rest of the holes for the studs and drill those out too. Total 32 holes drilled and 12 threads tapped on the passenger side cam cover alone for this bolt on part that totally clears all OEM cam covers.. Drivers side next as well as some E85 safe fuel foam to fill the space behind the behind cam cover baffle plates. oh and some lock nuts for the splash plates of course.
    • I had the same previously, and it really shits me. They just run off red book averages or whatever as the maximum insured, there are never good quality cars available to buy for anywhere near those prices. I don't even understand why they do it. Sure having a customer overinsure then false claim is a risk, but how often does that really happen in the world, 1%? 0.1%? On the other hand, all 10-20% above redbook listed prices and charge 10-20% higher premium, surely that is more profitable for those cockroaches
    • My take on gg2 48mm, 54mm, 58mm, and 62mm compressor map for same size compressor vs gg1 : All gg2 only outflow gg1 above 20 psi. As all g gen 2 surge line at lower left of comp map move to the right, all gg2 sacrifice spool vs same size gg1, surge line move to the right worst for 54mm gg2. So for same size compressor if you want best response, use gg1, if you want max hp at >20psi use gg2 but you will be laggier vs same size gg1. Max compressor efficiency drops to max 75% on all gg2 vs max 76%-80% of same size gg1. Iirc lower efficiency means hotter iat less dense air so lower hp at same operating point of comp map. Also curious why gg2 is mapped to lower max rpm vs same size gg1 (only 48mm size both gg1 gg2 mapped to same rpm) : 54mm gg1 165,000 rpm  vs  gg2 160,000 rpm. 58mm gg1 150,000 rpm vs gg2 140,000rpm. 62mm gg1 145,000 rpm vs gg2 140,000 rpm. If gg2 can safely spin to gg1 rpm then they can flow a bit more than as mapped. Good thing that all gg 2 interchange compressor and turbine housings with same size gg 1. So gg1 owners can buy gg2 chra only if planning to boost >20psi.
    • My stuff is all with Shannon's, granted, I don't really have imports I'm driving on the road, however, I've had multiple cars at the same time with them. Presently we have the Landcruiser on laid up cover, Sarah's Kluger on full cover, and the house insured. About 18 months ago Sarah wrote her Subaru Liberty GTB off, insured with Shannon's, and the payout, and buy back of the wreck was super quick. In 2020 we had the VF Commodore totalled in a major hailstorm. Storm was on the Saturday, I called on the Sunday and lodged it, vehicle was towed on Tuesday night, assessment team called on Wednesday to say it was a total loss and get payout details, money was in the bank on Thursday morning. Have had a few other claims both at fault, and not at fault, over the years, and never had an issue with them.   Funnily enough, they're also the cheapest insurer I find for things like Sarah's Kluger.   I will say I'm less impressed dealing with them lately around "the experience", as a lot of their staff that you deal with aren't car enthusiasts. Shannon's has a much more main stream feel ever since they decided to become "big corporate", laid a heap of staff off, and then hired a bunch of non enthusiasts. At the same time they've been making a push to be less "call us and we'll personally have someone who cares help" to "hey, this computer can do stuff for you" and are trying to get more square pegs to fit round holes. (That's just the vibe I get from them). Again, have had no issues with claims with them, but get a bit of a "less personal" feel from them.
×
×
  • Create New...