Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

The front one does make a heap of difference to corner handling. The front feels flatter (less body roll) as you go through a corner.

The rear makes less of a difference (due to it being in a different point in the suspension geometry) or something liek that :)

Worth having on the car though...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/99285-strut-brace/#findComment-1809524
Share on other sites

I liked them i have 1 front and back

back end loser when you go side ways and front takes out the body roll

i like them my self

i payed 100 for the front and 125 for the back easy to fit front but back you will need to cut the boot pannels

james

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/99285-strut-brace/#findComment-1810751
Share on other sites

2 things that strut braces do are

1/ Help mantain wheel alignment by reducing strut tower flex

2/ Look good

And not necessarily in that order.

A good strut brace, that works as engineered, will work on a car with a soft chassis. Its there to stop the car's body from flexing under lateral loads, and let the suspension do its work.

On older cars it will make a noticable difference, since their chassis would be relatively weaker...even before several years of wear and tear have worked on them.

Both of my cars have had factory strut braces, so I have no idea what its like without them. But, as people have said, it had better be bolted on solidly.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/99285-strut-brace/#findComment-1811373
Share on other sites

The only way to know is try with and without through the same series of corners. It does make a difference on the front as it makes it a little more responsive to wheel inputs. there are also a number of other mods that can do this so consider it part of an overall system improvement.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/99285-strut-brace/#findComment-1811512
Share on other sites

i was quite sceptical when installing mine, as to if it would make any difference at all.

Front didn't make much difference (I put them on first) then a week later I put the rears on and it felt heaps better, (using for drift, tended to be alot more stable)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/99285-strut-brace/#findComment-1812426
Share on other sites

See, I've got an R32 GTS 4 door.. standard open wheel diff.. I bought the car stock as a rock..

Added a front adjustable strut brace, you could DEFINITLY feel the difference.. the body felt alot more solid..

My flatmate then made me a box section strut brace for the rear.. again, him being an engineer and not into cars he definitly noticed the difference as did I..

I've got an open wheel diff as I said.. 90% of the time at speed it now spins both wheels.. not just a single one.. Made a huge improvement..

Next thing i'm going for is sway bars..

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/99285-strut-brace/#findComment-1813797
Share on other sites

ive got front and back on my r32 and i noticed alot of different with the body roll not sure if it was from the front or the back on put the on at the same time put you cant feel it sort of pulling or leaning out in corners i was happy with mine

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/99285-strut-brace/#findComment-1815297
Share on other sites

The usual strut brace design links (RHS to LHS) the top suspension mounting points and effectively doubles the rigidity of them. By reducing the flex, this stops changes in the suspension geometry, mostly camber. The springs and stabiliser bars work exactly as they did before, so there is no reduction in roll. The improved in handling comes from helping to maintain the static wheel elignment settings when the suspension is moving and the chassis flexing.

On R32/33/34 Skylines (2 door & 4 door) and equivalent Stageas, the front strut brace actually serves to effectively link the upper control arm inner mounting points to each other (RHS to LHS). This is because the upper corntol arms are actually mounted to the inner guard (chassis). You can see this by simply looking through the front wheel arches. So a front strut brace does serve quite a usefull purpose in helping to control the suspension geometry.

On the rear (of these models) this is simply not the case, the upper control arm inner mounting mounts are mounted to the sub frame, not the chassis. Adding a rear strut brace to the chassis between the rear shock towers, doesn't help the rigidity of the sub frame. You can also confirm this for yourself by loooking through the rear wheel arch and examining the upper control arm mounting points. Then compare this to where the strut brace actually mounts. Therefore the effect of fitting a strut brace to the rear is much, much less than the front.

:D cheers :cheers:

Edited by Sydneykid
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/99285-strut-brace/#findComment-1815682
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yep, I like that. The tags are only on the first post of a thread and we don't get huge numbers of new threads. Also, I plan to add some more report types and we could have a member report type like 'review tags' then members could flag if they thought a topic wasn't tagged correctly.  No way man, I dig the input. Thanks! 
    • It's a valid thought. There's not exactly that functionality already (when creating a thread) - that's where the OP can use/create any tag they want. We'd have to come up with a way for the user to request their tags get reviewed or something. Otherwise the mods would have to review every new post's tags (for those that have them, anyway). There's kind of that functionality already exists to some extent, post facto of starting the thread, where the OP or any other user could report the post to admins, and request that tags get reviewed. We could do this already, and any user could already have made such a request. To make it a part of the forum proper, it would require an initial and an ongoing education programme, so that people know that it's a thing. OP based tagging/request for review would also require at least some (probably most) of the user base to be told that it's a thing they can do. Both of these things probably wouldn't spread too far and/or get used very much. If it was the standard approach on a lot of different sites, then it might do, because people would be used to it. Prank's approach to this differs from my original thought, by leaning into tagging. Which is fine - it's possibly better than what I originally suggested. In fact, I just went to the R32 GTR wiring diagram thread and added tags, including "Library". That's probably a good way to use tags and the idea of a library. We just have to drag together an (organised!) index of threads or posts that have that tag. I have yet to do any of my own follow up by pursuing worthy threads and posts and reporting/marking/tagging them for the library, such as the @Sydneykid stuff I was talking about, and possibly any amount of @Lithium 's and others' posts. At least if I tag them Library, we'll have a start.   Back to @Wazmond's idea as it relates to @PranK's, we might have some sort of a list of tags that are already used to scrape for this library. I'm not entirely sure how that would be presented or used, particularly if it got long. But it's yet another idea!   cheers
    • Just a thought, but instead of restricting, is it possible to do like an "up for review" kind of thing? Where say someone who's not an admin/mod tags, it would require approval for it to actually tag? User posts with a 'tag' > Admin/Mod Reviews > Approves tag > Tag now exists kinda thing? Just came across this thread so Im not too sure if Im straying off topic or not but forgive me if i am...
    • Yes, a plan for non-action is always my first sort of plan! I'm happy to see what falls out of invision's update. I had been having some thoughts on what to do with this the other day and they all seem to have fled my memory, after various solar panel induced traumas, squeaking suspension sphericals, etc etc, over the last little bit. I'll try and recall what I had in mind and make sure that I put it into print in some form before the Alzheimer's strikes again.
    • The ability to have both a 5500 stall for launching, and a regular lockup for every other scenario is pretty sweet. Does it actually work well like that though in the real world? Would it hold up to track use and otherwise you'd never know you had a stall converter in it? If so, that's awesome
×
×
  • Create New...