Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

OK!

Now, for the pro's.

I have a RB26 powerd R32 GTS4, its setup for drift with my dancer grid controller ( rwd etc) works a treat.

car is setup for some dori. I was thinking> I have a thick arc cooler the car now never overheats.... seeing never past 85C in temps even if i sit on rev limiter pretty hard with my hks metal headgasket i got here also.

since the nismo thermostat opens up about 12C earlier, will that mean my temps will be floating in the mid70's? is this bad as the stock one opens up about 72C meaning its just going to run very cool? what will the side efects be of running lower temps...

cheers

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/99343-nismo-thermostat-for-drift/
Share on other sites

it wont make bugger all difference. also a thick intercooler will often make your engine (water temp/oil temp) run hotter, not cooler. A really thick core pre-heats the air before it passes through the rad. if you want to control engine temp you need a nice big oil cooler properly mounted in a duct.

cooler? :lol: im talking radiator here, i dont have a front mount :)

also got oil cooler with no thermostat :)

i just want to know the best operating temps for my car... to make the engine live aslong as possible.

i heard, just because the thermostat opens up early, doesnt mean temps will drop uptop, will get to the same heat

You need oil and water temp gauges to know these answers.

I wouldn't be game to run an engine oil cooler in a road car with no thermostat either.

Minimum gauges for drift IMHO are: oil pressure, oil temp, water temp, boost.

Not the stock water temp gauge either, it reads in a very rough range.

Its interesting to read why a thrmostat on a road car is essential...the way i see it in a road car you are often stationary, in which case oil cooler isnt working, and at best the speeds you travel on the street combined with the fact that you cant really give your car stick on the street so that to the temp differential between your oil temp and ambient air increases, well i dont see it as being that big a no no.

Also, is 80deg C oil any better or worse for your car then 75 or 85 deg C???

I suspect all the Nismo thermostat does is reduce the rate of heating of coolant rather then influence the peak temp, i doubt it will do any damage to an engine...but im happy to hear from soemone htat knows as opposed to guessing :P

Standard Thermostat is

Commence Open 76.5degC

Full Open 90degC

What is the full specs on the Nismo item, any idea?

Yeah, my question as well re Nismo thermostat. From the way my motor behaves with the stock thermo, the specs you mention above are spot on. I have Microtech so water and air inlet temps on display.

My motor does tend to spike in water temp too fast for my liking so if Nismo thermo helps then all the better. I have Nismo water pump and that also helped alot.

Edited by Freebaggin

An interesting topic this one , I get the idea that good synthetic oils are less viscous at lower temperatures than mineral oils so oil drag is less of a problem .

There is one school of thought that says lower coolant temps can make more power because less chamber heat is conducted into the fuel/air mix before it is ignited by the spark . So if the detonation threshold is lower a little more full load advance can be used all else being equal .

It probably a case of std thermostat for road and lower for race , its hard to imagine the oil being too cool in a hard worked engine on the track .

Cheers A .

Well in one of my old RB powered cars, when i purchased it, it would never go above the cold mark, used lots of fuel and generally ran average.

When i removed the thermostat it was an aftermarket job, that due to the poor designed actually got stuck open.

Even in traffic it would never really go above cold.

I don't advise no thermostat at all it will cause major wear and tear.

The other thing is as well, no thermostat generally means that the water can pass through the radiator too quickly and it can't remove the heat as it doesn't have time and it can overheat at the other end of the scale.

Too Cold or Too Hot.

Thermostat is a critical piece of the puzzle for sure....

My GTR has 1 of these Nismo thermo thingies.... i've driven 300km in it this afternoon; ambient temp = 26-31c, Intake Air Temp = 48-52c, Water Temp = 76-80c and those temps ranged from 110km/h highway driving to start stop start stop with it copping a hiding inbetween :D

I'll see tomorrow if I have any manuals with it etc.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • So, the other thing I've sorted is a baseline dyno run up at Unigroup's new location. The auto trans was a little unco-operative by both shifting down when the throttle was floored on the dyno (so Mark had to ramp it up more slowly than in a manual) and also by shifting up at 6,000 even in sports mode instead of the indicated redline of 7,000 Still, on a hot day it made 240rwkw at 16psi which seems about right for 300kw (400hp) through an auto at the wheels.  The shape of the curve is not quite right because it was not full throttle to about 4,500 to stop it kicking down, but until I can get a tune on the auto trans control this was the best we could do.....full boost will be well below 5,000 once that is sorted, I'll get some data logs when I can to confirm For comparison, the R32 made 255 at 12psi (at 4,500) on the same dyno with tune, n1 turbos, cam gears, big exhaust but otherwise all standard so the v37 is likely a little better out of the box. One thing that is very clear is that the standard water to air intercoolers are not up to sustained use at full throttle in warm ambient temps. After about 5 runs (so only a few minutes full throttle), it was pulling boost and timing and dropping 10-15% power. Unfortunately I didn't get that printout and the Unigroup guys are away at the moment, will try and get hold of it on their return. So, looks like a healthy engine to start modifying and the only real area of concern is the w2a heat exchangers which the aftermarket has plenty of solutions for    
    • I maintain it actually looked really nice in person. So much so that I thought "No, this is illegal" but there it was, clear as day. I think we can easily call the wing and wheels/height to be transformative. Not saying it's better than the GR Whatever, or the 86, or the WRX STI or anything of that sort (the internet says it all bolts up so you can buy best of all worlds?) but it's still at least a thing and not nearly AS bad as people say.
    • That's less offensive than the previous gen.....except for all that ugly black tupperware around the edges. Blerck!
    • I leant out the window recently and took a picture of this new WRX. It looked real damn fine in person. It's faster around a track (stock) than a (stock) GR Yaris. It's much more practical despite being heavier. It's significantly cheaper. This gen tunes really well, much better than others. .... I think they're probably a lot better than people expect.
    • WRXs are a pure pleb boring car these days. You need to get an STI to even get close to what a WRX used to be.
×
×
  • Create New...