Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I have a stock R33. I plan to do the following in the next 12 months:

1. Pod filter or higher flow panel filter.

2. 3" mandrel bent exhaust in mild steel incld. dump pipe

3. FMIC

When is it safe to wind the boost up, and to what sort of PSI?

Also, is factory boost 5 psi?

I am thinking of getting a 2 stage bleed valve with a switch in the cabin (high & low). What is the benefit of an electronic boost controler apart from ease of use and a flashy box?

Thanks,

James.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/9943-how-much-boost-can-i-run-on-my-r33/
Share on other sites

EBC have been proven

to hold boost more steadier you don't get any spiking

whereas as many time we have all said before

bleed valves aren't too good as they spike and shit

which cause your boost levels to go all over the place!

go the ebc even if you have to save more money

it's worth it in the end

cheers

adrian :)

The factory setting is 7psi on the R33 i think, i wouldn't wind it past past 14psi to be safe. Put simply boost controllers work similar to a tap on a pipe, adjusting it can allow the driver to raise or lower the boost pressure. By "tricking" the actuator (this controls the wastegate) into believing a lower boost level is being generated. This allows the turbo to generate more boost as the wastegate opens later.

James,

Bring her around we'll wind her up to about 20psi. It'll be right :)

If you want, I'll take you for a drive in mine and you can see what sort of spikes you can get with a bleed. James and I tuned my bleed valve, pretty easy.

I think mine spikes to about 13 and settles on 12psi. 10-12psi is ok on the stock cooler, but I'd get the exhaust done first.

EBC's will give heaps better results over a bleed, but so they should for about 5 times the price of a good bleed valve. EBC's will give you no wastegate creep, but you can get bleed valves that reduce wastegate creep heaps - but not down to zero like a EBC will.

I'd reccomend 10psi, maybe 12. If you want the turbo to last.

people run 14psi, with FMIC's, due to the pressure drop being only a couple of psi at this level, where as the stock cooler runs out of legs at this boost.

Bleed valves suck (although I have one). An EBC will hold boost and prevent the 'spike' associated with bleeders. Boost will be brought on faster and hold (meaning faster accelleration --- something that a dyno won't pickup).

If you intend sticking with the stock turbo and are not a regular visitor to the race track, put your money back in your pocket and don't buy the FMIC, unless you get one that only just flows say 300HP or just under. A cooler of this size will retain the valuable response and if designed well will allow a few extra psi without a serious pressure drop.

When shopping for an interccoler reccomendation ask :

" So how much horsepower can this intercooler you are reccomending flow?"

They answer " Mate this one is good for over 500HP! just what you need mate!"

You respond " No thanks. Which intercooler can flow upto 300HP max with some efficiency, cause thats all I am planning on making with this engine?"

Ditto for head porting, turbo sizing, camshaft selection, throttle body size etc.....

EBC is the way to go. I got one of those GReddy profec B spec. Highly rate it hey.

Lo boost set ot 7psi and hi boost to 11psi. runs fine. good acceleration no spiking etc....

even with no boost on it comes on kwcker too.

cost = $600 ish and then fitting + $250.00

ciao...

Mr Squiggle: Do you have a front mount or do you run that boost on the stock core?

So just to clarify, I should do the exhaust, the pod and get an EBC and scrap the FMIC?

Maybe spend the money on a new ECU?

Anything over 12psi would be a waste as the stock turbo is running out of it's effiency curve, for eg. at 11psi my car makes 184rwkw and at 12psi it makes 188rwkw so you can see it wouldn't be worth risking blowing up the turbo for another couple of kw that I might get at 13-14psi. Remember it's airflow that creates power not just psi, so a larger turbo at 10psi would make more power than I'm currently making at 12psi with the stockie.

Nissan turbo seals on teh exhaust side are only rated to 14psi from the factory correct... eh? The problem associated with a manual bleed valve is that they do spike like you are all saying, however the problem does lie within a stock cooler, where the pressure loss between the turbo and what reaches the intake manifold is destroyde dby the shitty flow and efficiency of the stock coolers. Most guys who are running around 10-12 at the boost gauge are actually pumping about 15psi or more out of the turbo because the turbo needs to push that much to make the 10-12psi at the intake cos the cooler looses so much. Definately if you are gonna do the main mod's most people do i.e. intake, exhaust, boost etc. Invest in a cooler and not only get cooler air and make more power but save your turbo from doing more work than it needs to and than it can take. After all if they are rated at 14 adn you have to put the turbo through 15psi to make 10-12psi then why bother risking it?

Nissan turbo seals on teh exhaust side are only rated to 14psi from the factory correct... eh? The problem associated with a manual bleed valve is that they do spike like you are all saying, however the problem does lie within a stock cooler, where the pressure loss between the turbo and what reaches the intake manifold is destroyde dby the shitty flow and efficiency of the stock coolers. Most guys who are running around 10-12 at the boost gauge are actually pumping about 15psi or more out of the turbo because the turbo needs to push that much to make the 10-12psi at the intake cos the cooler looses so much. Definately if you are gonna do the main mod's most people do i.e. intake, exhaust, boost etc. Invest in a cooler and not only get cooler air and make more power but save your turbo from doing more work than it needs to and than it can take. After all if they are rated at 14 adn you have to put the turbo through 15psi to make 10-12psi then why bother risking it? Not to mention spiking which can be +-2psi on a manual bleed valve which then throws teh turbo way out of both its efficiency range and safety range.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The old manifold was quite under the GTR strut brace.  The new manifold is quite [unknown] the GTR strut brace. The GTR strut brace was needed to clear the bonnet vents. The Old strut brace will almost certainly clear the new manifold, but not the bonnet vents. The old strut brace will almost certainly clear the new manifold, and the new bonnet without vents. But I am hoping the GTR strut brace clears the new manifold :p
    • On the bright side, at least you knew that it happened and remedied before anything happened. A friend of mine just took his Fiat 124 to a shop for an oil change and they didn't tighten the oil filter housing properly. 4.5 quarts spewed out and even after refilling + tightening the cap the engine has a tick now.
    • So, more pain. The FAST manifold is a little larger than the stocker. This is problematic because there really wasn't much clearance to begin with, so going from 'barely enough' well into 'no' is sad based on the external dimensions of the thing, even though where it bolts to the head is the same. Result is the fuel rails sit a good 25mm higher, and this is a bit of an issue with the wiring that runs behind the motor, and the fuel lines, and everything else. When pushing the manifold on, it required a huge amount of force to crush wiring looms to fit it, sensors like the MAP sensor are about 1mm from the firewall, and the FPR just has to bend ABS lines to be forced into place. After some brainstorming and some sad drinking, the loom for some reason ran from the grommet behind the ABS sensor, then to the driver side head, then back to the passenger side head. So all of this was pulled back and stripped, a few wires cut and rejoined, so that the 'branch' was now on the passenger side's head as below: Before you basically couldn't see anything behind the driver head. This is much improved! The MAP sensor is now pointing up (instead of at the firewall) Brackets have been made up for the rail. The rails are for a LS1, the manifold is designed around a LS2 as it's base. Which of course has slightly different bracketry and water pump clearance, hence the mods people need to do. Should be hopefully mounted tonight. I spent money on a new FPR that is slightly more compact than my Turbosmart FPR1200. The gauge has also been moved to the rail. There's also apparently an ORB to AN Union instead of the adapter, because the ~25mm of the current adapter is going to make the difference. Provided this all goes together and arrives today, it'll be the totally not stressful attempt to start it.
    • This seems like a pointless exercise. There is no E30 availability. Ongoing availability of E85 should not be assumed. Flex-fuel is the only sensible approach, so you can use E85 when and where you can get it, 98 when that's al you can get, and anything in between as you fill it up and drain it down. And if that means replacing the pumps, fitting a flex capable sensor/ECU/whatever has to be done to these Renault shitboxen, then.....so be it?
×
×
  • Create New...