Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i didnt think you needed the filter on there for the plumb back just the atmo? and no that doesnt look like the plumb back to me.

more like the one sydneykid shows.

ill take a pic off mine and post it up tomorow.

Edited by gt-t_r34
omg no, that is wrong.

You DO NOT need to plumb your catch can tank to the induction of your turbo. Block that one up...

how come that is wrong? i can't tell from the pics, but is the pcv side capped?

why is it bad to pull the air through your catch can to the induction of the turbo? the catch can in theory will catch all the oil under boost, which is what you want, no?

the setup looks ok to me..

EDIT: nevermind, just looked at the 2nd pic and noticed your catch can is open to the atmosphere. thats not gonna work cuz your turbo will suck in extra unmetered air through that breather filter. take the hose going back to your turbo inlet and put it on the other valve cover. then cap the turbo side and the pcv side.

Edited by gawdzilla

It is certainly at least a 50% plumb back design. It could be a 100% plumb back design, but I can't see RHS cam cover to tell what is going on on that side.

The filter on the catch can is of course redundant in a 50% plumb back application.

:D cheers :cheers:

legally your supposed to have it plumbed back into your intake...however who abides the road laws anyway. Just go from both covers to the can and block off to your intake and the top release which you are using atm.

You probably want to remove the kink in the return to the intake before you block the filter off though.

When the pcv shuts under boost all the vapour will be pushed/sucked out by the one hose anyway, it's pointless running a hose from each rocker.

I'd maintain the current setup and be blocking the filter for a few of reasons, 1 it's an obvious defect, 2 i don't particularly like the smell of oil vapour, 3 if you maintain the line to the inlet then the filter is redundant.

Edited by BHDave

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Reading your posts Josh, sometimes I feel like I've gone in a time machine back to the 90's when everyone was doe-eyed and figuring things out for the first time.  I've lost track of how many single turbo GTR's I've seen on track that haven't burnt down lol. Everything has been figured out a long time ago. These things are at the point now where its essentially turn-key to go single turbo. 
    • Among other things yes. Making sure to either use an oil pressure regulator or the right restrictor size for your oil pump/range of oil viscosities you intend to run, making sure you plumb the lines correctly, turbo should be placed such that it siphons properly even when the water pump isn't turning so you don't boil coolant in the turbo after shutdown, oil return should be low resistance and also preferably picking the one that is most likely to return to the pickup as opposed to some other irrelevant part of the pan. It's far from impossible to figure this out but I have seen people really, really struggle and if that's the case it's easier to just take the path of least resistance. To me, bolt-on twin turbos are a fixed cost whereas single turbo is almost unbounded.
    • Latest round of updates on the car. I purchased and installed a SWS clutch slipper to help with 60ft times and got some second-hand good condition 275/40R17 Hoosier DR2 radials. Test and tune in November showed the tyres were an upgrade over my over 15 year old mickey Thompson's and I got a 1.8 second 60ft and pb et of 11.71 but even then, that run wasn't great due to rain and driver error (the event got called off 10 minutes later fast forward to the weekend just gone 25th of Jan and there was finally a break in the weather to let racing happen. The first run the track was slippery and only managed a 12.1@129 Second run the track was better and got a new pb et and mph: 11.54@131   Lith and I then worked out that I installed the previously mentioned clutch slipper incorrectly and its never been working, and I had just been dumping the clutch the entire time, we also noticed it was on street boost and not race boost. So I lined up for a third run with the car turned up in the first two gears, but the passengers side axle objected to clutch dumps and left the chat which stopped my weekend.   so there will be another attempt in the future once I replace the tyres as they rubbed and are stuffed now. but a low 11 should be on the cards.
    • Ceramic coating and heat shielding, you mean?
    • Turbos don't require pulling the motor apart so that's "easier". I would recommend the Nismo R3 turbos instead if you want to do stock twin turbo. It doesn't make as much power as the 2530s but it's only like ~50 whp off the mark and should have better response (ball bearing CHRA, slightly smaller turbo). A local that went with a Garrett G30 and 6boost manifold recently nearly burned his car to the ground after the hood insulator started melting and and burning so if you go single turbo I recommend doing a lot of research and validation work to make sure you don't do the same.
×
×
  • Create New...